Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 33, Issue 2–3, pp 455–459 | Cite as

In vitro morphogenesis in wheat/Thinopyrum elongatum chromosome addition lines

  • N. D. TyankovaEmail author
  • N. A. Zagorska


The influence of individual Thinopyrum elongatum chromosomes on callus induction and morphogenic ability of in vitro cultivated immature embryos of wheat/Thinopyrum elongatum addition lines was studied. An euploid form of cultivar Chinese Spring of Triticum aestivum (2n=42), AABBDD, seven disomic addition lines of Chinese Spring with chromosomes of Thinopyrum elongatum (2n=14) EE, and the amphidiploid Chinese Spring/Thinopyrum elongatum (2n=56), AABBDDEE, were used as donor plants. Immature 14 days old embryos were in vitro cultivated. A relatively high number of calli were issued in embryocultures of all studied lines without significant variations among them. Relatively lower callus induction rate occurred only in the addition line containing 5E chromosome. Substantial differences were observed between the lines in respect to the number of both initiated morphogenic calli and regenerants obtained. The highest number of morphogenic calli and regenerants was obtained in cultures of lines containing the Thinopyrum elongatum chromosomes 1E and 6E and the lowest one - in the 4E addition line. The data suggest that the effect of Thinopyrum elongatum chromosomes could be due to existence of homeoalleles in those chromosomes, but the presence in Thinopyrum elongatum genome of genes and alleles affecting specifically in vitro response can not be excluded either.

Key words

addition lines immature embryos tissue culture plant regeneration 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ben Amer, I. M., Worland, A. J., Börner, A., 1995. Chromosomal location of genes affecting tissue culture response in wheat. Plant Breeding 114: 84–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben Amer, I. M., Korzum, V., Worland, A. J., Bömer, A., 1997. Genetic mapping of QTL controlling tissue culture response on chromosome 2B of wheat (T. aestivum) in relation to major genes and RFLP markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94: 1047–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bosh, A., Vega, G., Benito, C., 1987. The peroxidase isozymes of wheat kernel: Tissue and substrate specificity and their chromosomal location. Theor. Appl. Genet. 73: 701–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Felsenburg, T., Feldman, M., Galun, E., 1987. An euploid and alloplasmic lines as tools for the study of nuclear and cytoplasmic control of culture ability common wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 74: 802–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gale, M. D., Miller, T. E., 1987. The introduction of alien genetic variation in wheat. In: Wheat Breeding, Cambridge University Press, London-New York: 113–207Google Scholar
  6. Galiba, G., Kovacs, G., Sutka, J., 1986. Substitution analysis of plant regeneration from callus culture in wheat. Plant Breeding 97: 261–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hay, J. M., De Pienaar, R. V., 1990. Tissue culture response of addition and substitution lines in wheat. 7th Int. Congr. Plant Tissue Cell Cult., Amsterdam: 17Google Scholar
  8. Henry, Y., Marcote, J.L., De Buyser, J., Guenegon, T., Ory, C., 1994. Chromosomal location of genes controlling short-term and long-term somatic embryogenesis in wheat revealed by immature embryo culture of aneuploid lines. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89: 334–350Google Scholar
  9. Higgins, P., Mathias, R. J., 1987. The effect of the 4B chromosome of hexaploid wheat on the growth and regeneration of callus cultures. Theor. Appl. Genet. 74, 439–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Islam, A.K.M.R., Shepherd, K. W., Sparrow, D.H.B., 1981. Isolation and characterization of euplasmic wheat-barley chromosome addition lines. Heredity 46: 161–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaleikau, E. K., Sears, R.G., Gill, B. S., 1989. Monosomic analysis of tissue culture response in wheat (T. aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 78: 625–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lazar, M. D., Chen, T. H. H., Scoles, G. J., Kartha, K. K., 1987. Immature embryo and anther culture of chromosome addition lines of rye in Chinese Spring wheat. Plant Science 51: 77–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mathias, R.I., Fukui, K. 1986. The effect of specific chromosome and cytoplasmic substitution on the tissue culture response of wheat (T. aestivum) callus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 71:797–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Molnar-Lang, M., Kőszegi, B., Linc, G., Galiba, G., Sutka, J. 1996. Chromosome instability of wheat-barley ditelosomic addition lines in tissue culture. Cereal Res. Comm. 24: 275–281Google Scholar
  15. Murashige, T., Skoog, F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Riley, R., Chapman, V., 1958. Production and phenotypes of wheat-rye chromosome addition lines. Heredity 12: 301–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sears, E. R., 1954. The aneuploids of common wheat. Mo Agric Exp Stn Res Bull 572:1–57Google Scholar
  18. Tyankova, N.D., Zagorska, N. A., 2001. Genetic control of In vitro response in wheat (T. aestivum L.). In Vitro Cell Dev. Plant 37, 524–530.Google Scholar
  19. Tyankova, N.D., Zagorska, N., Dimitrov, B., 2003. Callus induction and organogenezis in wheat / Aegilops longissima chromosome addition lines. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 72 (2), 193–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2005

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Genetics “Acad. D. Kostoff”Bulgarian Academy of SciencesSofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations