Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 700–709 | Cite as

Interactive Genotypic Influence of Triticale and Wheat on Their Crossability and Haploid Induction under Varied Agroclimatic Regimes

  • A. BadiyalEmail author
  • H. K. Chaudhary
  • N. S. Jamwal
  • W. Hussain
  • A. Mahato
  • A. K. Bhatt
Breeding

Abstract

The investigation was undertaken at two different climatic regimens of NW Himalayas, to determine the response of diverse genotypes of triticale and wheat and environment on their crossability as well as to evaluate the efficiency of Imperata cylindrica-mediated chromosome elimination approach for haploid induction in triticale × wheat (Triticum aestivum) hybrids. The experimental material included three elite hexaploid triticale genotypes (DT123, DT126 and TL9335) and five bread wheat genotypes (DH40, HPW155, HS295, VL829 and C306). Significant genotypic and environmental variations were observed for seed setting at two agroclimatic zones. Among parental genotypes, DT126 (triticale) and C306, HPW155 and HS295 (wheat) responded significantly better for seed setting due to significant positive GCA effects at both locations. Maximum seed set of 39.53% and 45.37% was recorded at short day and long day climates, respectively, proving later as the better location for seed setting in most of the crosses. For all the three parameters of haploid induction, viz. pseudoseed formation, embryo formation and regeneration, significant differences were recorded in all the triticale × wheat hybrids depicting the potential of I. cylindrica-mediated approach for haploid induction. Triticale × wheat cross DT126 × HS295 followed by DT126 × HPW155 were found to be significantly more responsive towards embryo formation and regeneration.

Keywords

crossability triticale × wheat haploid induction NW Himalayas 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amrani M., Sarrafi A., Alibert G. 1993. Genetic variability for haploid production in crosses between tetraploid and hexaploid wheat with maize. Plant Breed. 110:123–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Behl R.K., Sareen P.K., Chowdhury J.B. 1981. Morpho-histological studies in triticale × wheat hybrids. In: Manna G.K., Sinha U. (eds), Perspectives in cytology and genetics. Hindasia Pub. New Delhi India, pp. 449–452.Google Scholar
  3. Bijral J.S., Kamwal K.S., Sharma T.R. 1996. Effect of parental genotypes on crossability in Triticale × wheat crosses. Indian J. Genet. 56:219–222.Google Scholar
  4. Brazauskas G., Pasakinskiene I. 2001. Genotype effect on wheat haploid production in wheat × maize crosses. Biologia 1:50–52.Google Scholar
  5. Cameron R.G., Reger B.J. 1991. Hybridization barriers between wheat and rye: in vitro pollen assays and electrophoretic survey. Euphytica 52:147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaubey N.K., Khanna V.K. 1986. A study of crossability between wheat, triticale and rye. Current Sci. 55:744–745.Google Scholar
  7. Chaudhary H.K., Singh S., Sethi G.S. 2002. Interactive influence of wheat and maize genotypes on the induction of haploids in winter × spring hexaploid wheat hybrids. J. Genet. Breed. 56:259–266.Google Scholar
  8. Chaudhary H.K. 2008. Dynamics of wheat Imperata cylindrica — Anew chromosome elimination mediated system for efficient haploid induction in wheat. In: Appels R., Eastwood R., Lagudah E., Langridge P., Mackay M., McIntyre L., Sharp P. (eds), Proc. 11th International Wheat Genetics Symposium. University of Sydney Press Sydney, Australia 2:647–650.Google Scholar
  9. Chaudhary H.K. 2013. New frontiers in chromosome elimination mediated doubled haploidy breeding for accelerated and high precision genetic upgradation in wheat. Proc. Int. Triticeae Mapping Initiative and Plant & Animal Genome. XXI Conference San Diego USA, p. 26.Google Scholar
  10. Chaudhary H.K., Tayeng T., Kaila V., Rather S.A. 2013a. Enhancing the efficiency of wide hybridization mediated chromosome engineering for high precision crop improvement with special reference to wheat × Imperata cylindrica system. The Nucleus 56:7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chaudhary H.K., Tayeng T., Kaila V., Rather S.A. 2013b. Use of asynchrony in flowering for easy and economical polyhaploid induction in wheat following Imperata cylindrica-mediated chromosome elimination approach. Plant Breed. 132:155–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chaudhary H.K., Sethi G.S., Singh S., Pratap A., Sharma S. 2005. Efficient haploid induction in wheat by using pollen of Imperata cylindrica. Plant Breed. 124:96–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dhiman R., Rana V., Chaudhary H.K. 2012. Himalayan maize — potential pollen source for maize mediated system of chromosome elimination approach in DH breeding of bread wheat. Cereal Res. Commun. 40:246–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Friebe B., Jiang J., Raupp W.J., McIntosh R.A., Gill B.S. 1996. Characterization of wheat-alien translocations conferring resistance to diseases and pests: current status. Euphytica 91:59–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hills M.J., Hall L.M., Messenger D.F., Graf R.J., Beres B.L., Eudes F. 2007. Evaluation of crossability between triticale (× Triticosecale Wittmack) and common wheat, durum wheat and rye. Environ. Biosafety Res. 6:249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Inagaki M., Tahir M. 1990. Comparison of haploid production frequencies in wheat varieties crossed with Hordeum bulbosum L. and maize. Japanese J. Breed. 40:209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kebede A.Z., Dhillon B.S., Schipprack W., Araus J.L., Banziger M., Semagn K., Alvarado G., Melchinger A.E. 2011. Effect of source germplasm and season on the in vivo haploid induction rate in tropical maize. Euphytica 180:219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kempthorne O. 1957. An Introduction to Genetic Statistics. The Iowa State University Press, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York USA, 545 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Khanna V.K. 1990. Germination, pollen fertility and crossability between triticale and wheat and reversion patterns in early segregating generations. Cereal Res. Commun. 18:359–562.Google Scholar
  20. Kim W., Johnson J.W., Graybosch R.A., Gaines C.S. 2003. The effect of T1DL.1RS wheat-rye chromosomal translocation on agronomic performance and end-use quality of soft wheat. Cereal Res. Commun. 31:301–308.Google Scholar
  21. Kishore N., Chaudhary H.K., Chahota R.K., Kumar V., Sood S.P., Jeberson S. 2011. Relative efficiency of the maize and Imperata cylindrica mediated chromosome elimination approaches for induction of haploids of wheat-rye derivatives. Plant Breed. 130:192–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krolow K.D. 1970. Investigations on compatibility between wheat and rye. Z. Pflanzenzüchtg. 64:44–72.Google Scholar
  23. Lein A. 1943. The genetical basis of the crossability between wheat and rye. Z. Indukt. Abstamm. Vererbungsl. 81:28–59.Google Scholar
  24. Pratap A., Sethi G.S., Chaudhary H.K. 2005. Relative efficiency of different Gramineae genera for haploid induction in triticale and triticale wheat hybrids through the chromosome elimination technique. Plant Breed. 124:147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pratap A., Chaudhary H.K. 2007. Comparative studies on crossability among triticale and wheat gene pools under different climatic regimes. J. Genet. Breed. 2:141–143.Google Scholar
  26. Riley R., Chapman V. 1967. The inheritance in wheat of crossability with rye. Genet. Res. 9:259–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sebesta E.E., Wood E.A. jr., Porter D.R., Webster J.A., Smith E.L. 1995. Registration of Amigo wheat germplasm resistant to greenbug. Crop Sci. 35:293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sharma S., Sethi G.S., Chaudhary H.K. 2005. Influence of winter and spring wheat genetic backgrounds on haploid induction parameters and trait correlations in the wheat × maize system. Euphytica 144:199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sitch L.A., Snape J.W., Firman S.J. 1985. Intrachromosomal mapping of crossability genes in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Theor. Appl. Genet. 70:309–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Starovoitova E.E. 1987. Studying the crossability of triticale with wheat and the characteristics of the hybrids. Selektsiya i semenovodstvo zernovykh i bobovykh kultur, pp. 53–57. (In Russian)Google Scholar
  31. Suenaga K. 1994. Doubled haploid system using the intergeneric crosses between wheat (Triticum aestivum) and maize (Zea mays). Bulletin of the Natl Inst. of Agrobiol. Resour. 9:83–139.Google Scholar
  32. Vishwakarma S.R., Mani S.C. 1986. Crossability between triticale × wheat and reversion patterns in early segregating generations. Current Sci. 54:42–43.Google Scholar
  33. Zheng Y.L., Luo M.C., Yen C., Yang J.L. 1992. Chromosome location of a new crossability gene in common wheat. Wheat Inf. Serv. 75:36–40.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2014

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Badiyal
    • 1
    Email author
  • H. K. Chaudhary
    • 1
  • N. S. Jamwal
    • 1
  • W. Hussain
    • 1
  • A. Mahato
    • 1
  • A. K. Bhatt
    • 2
  1. 1.Molecular Cytogenetics and Tissue Culture Lab., Department of Crop ImprovementCSK HPKVPalampurIndia
  2. 2.Department of BiotechnologyHimachal Pradesh UniversityShimlaIndia

Personalised recommendations