Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 647–660 | Cite as

Effects of Novel Solid-stemmed Wheat Genotype on Cephus cinctus Norton and its Parasitoid Bracon cephi

  • X. H. Wu
  • H. A. CárcamoEmail author
  • B. L. Beres
  • F. Clarke
  • R. DePauw
  • B. P. Pang


Host plant resistance in the form of wheat with the stem lumen filled with pith has been the main strategy to manage the wheat stem sawfly, Cephus cinctus Norton (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) — a major pest of wheat in the northern Great Plains of North America. Recently a new source of resistance has been made available combining a single dominant solid pith gene from durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) with spring bread wheat cultivars. Our study had two objectives: (i) assess levels of C. cinctus damage and larval C. cinctus mortality in wheat with the novel solid germplasm, conventional solid-stems and susceptible cultivars; and (ii) determine plant genotype effects on populations of C. cinctus parasitoid Bracon cephi (Gahan) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). The study was conducted in plots near Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada from 2003–2005. The novel solid-stemmed hexaploid G9608B1-L12J11BF02, solid-stemmed AC Eatonia and hollow-stemmed durum AC Navigator reduced the infestation level and girdling damage by C. cinctus. Another synthetic hexaploid B9973B03&AC4AW, hollow-stemmed AC Cadillac, McKenzie and AC Barrie were more susceptible to C. cinctus damage. Larval parasitism by B. cephi increased along with C. cinctus infestation levels. Stem solidness itself, regardless of source, had no direct negative effect on B. cephi but due to lower infestation and survival of C. cinctus in solid stem genotypes, the overall population of parasitoids was reduced. When planting monocultures of effective solid stem wheat, strategies to conserve populations of parasitoids should be considered for long term sustainable management of C. cinctus.


Cephus cinctu Bracon cephi tritrophic interactions biological control 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beres, B.L., Carcamo, H.A., Byers, J.R. 2007. Effect of wheat stem sawfly damage on yield and quality of selected Canadian spring wheat. J. Econ. Entomol. 100:79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beres, B.L., Dosdall, L.M., Weaver, D.K., Spaner, D.M., Cárcamo, H.A. 2011. The biology and integrated management of wheat stem sawfly, Cephus cinctus (Hymenoptera: Cephidae), and the need for continuing research. Can. Entomol. 143:105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buteler, M., Weaver, D.K., Miller, P.R. 2008. Wheat stem sawfly-infested plants benefit from parasitism of the herbivorous larvae. Agric. For. Entomol. 10:347–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buteler, M., Weaver, D.K. 2012. Host selection by the wheat stem sawfly in winter wheat and the role of semiochemicals mediating oviposition preference. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 143:138–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cárcamo, H.A., Beres, B.L., Clarke, F., Byers, R.J., Mundel, H.H., May, K., DePauw, R. 2005. Influence of plant host quality on fitness and sex ratio of the wheat stem sawfly (Hymenoptera: Cephidae). Environ. Entomol. 34:1579–1592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarke, F.R., Aung, T., DePauw, R.M. 1998. Simplifying the inheritance of resistance to wheat stem sawfly (Cephus cinctus Nort.). Biotic Stresses 3:240–242.Google Scholar
  7. Clarke, F.R., Clarke, J.M., Knox, R.E. 2002. Inheritance of stem solidness in eight durum wheat crosses. Can. J. Plant Sci. 82:661–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke, F.R., DePauw, R.M., Aung, T. 2005. Registration of sawfly resistant hexaploid spring wheat germplasm lines derived from durum. Crop Sci. 45:1665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarke, J.M., DePauw, R.M., McCaig, T.N., Fernandez, M.R., Knox, R.E., McLeod, J.G. 1997. AC Elsa hard red spring wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 77:661–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarke, J.M., McLeod, J.G., DePauw, R.M., Marchylo, B.A., McCaig, T.N., Knox, R.E., Fernandez, M.R., Ames, N. 2000. AC Navigator durum wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 80:343–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DePauw, R.M., McLeod, J.G., Clarke, J.M., McCaig, T.N., Fernandez, M.R., Knox, R.E. 1994. AC Eatonia hard red spring wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 74:821–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DePauw, R.M., Clarke, J.M., Knox, R.E., Fernandez, M.R., McCaig, T.N., McLeod, J.G. 2000. AC Abbey hard red spring wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 80:123–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DePauw, R.M., Thomas, J.B., Knox, R.E., Clarke, J.M., Fernandez, M.R., McCaig, T.N., McLeod, J.G. 1998. AC Cadillac hard red spring wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 78:459–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ecological Stratification Working Group 1995. A national ecological framework for Canada. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa/Hull, Canada.Google Scholar
  15. Fletcher, J. 1896. The western wheat stem sawfly (Cephus pygmaeus L.). Dominion of Canada, Department of Agriculture, Report of the Dominion Entomologist, pp. 147–149.Google Scholar
  16. Graf, R.J., Hucl, P., Orshinsky, B.R., Kartha, K.K. 2003. McKenzie hard red spring wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 83:565–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holmes, N.D. 1977. The effect of the wheat stem sawfly, Cephus cinctus (Hymenoptera: Cephidae), on the yield and quality of wheat. Can. Entomol. 109:1591–1598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holmes, N.D. 1979. The wheat stem sawfly. Proceedings of the 26th Entomological Society of Alberta Meeting 26:2–13.Google Scholar
  19. Holmes, N.D. 1982. Population dynamics of the wheat stem sawfly, Cephus cinctus (Hymenoptera: Cephidae), in wheat. Can. Entomol. 114:775–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holmes, N.D. 1984. The effect of light on the resistance of hard red spring wheats to the wheat stem sawfly, Cephus cinctus (Hymenoptera: Cephidae). Can. Entomol. 116:677–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holmes, N.D., Peterson, L.K. 1961. Resistance of spring wheats to the wheat stem sawfly, Cephus cinctus Nort. (Hymenoptera: Cephidae). I. Resistance to the egg. Can. Entomol. 93:250–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holmes, N.D., Peterson, L.K. 1962. Resistance of spring wheats to the wheat stem sawfly, Cephus cinctus Nort. (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) II. Resistance to the larva. Can. Entomol. 94:348–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holmes, N.D., Nelson, W.A., Peterson, L.K., Farstad, C.W. 1963. Causes of variations in effectiveness of Bracon cephi (Gahan) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) as a parasite of the wheat stem sawfly. Can. Entomol. 95:113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kemp, H.J. 1934. Studies of solid stem wheat varieties in relation to wheat stem sawfly control. Sci. Agric. 15:30–38.Google Scholar
  25. Larson, R.I. 1959. Inheritance of the type of solid stem in Golden Ball (Triticum durum) II. Cytogenetics of the relation between solid stem and other morphological characters in hexaploid F5 lines of a hybrid with Rescue (T. aestivum). Can. J. Bot. 37:1207–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Matsumura, S. 1947. Chromosomanalyze des Dinkelsgenomes auf Grund cytologischer Untersuchungen an pentaploiden Weiszenbastarden (Chromosome analysis of the spelt genome on basis of cytological examination of pentaploid wheat progeny). La Kromosoma 3–4:113–132. (in German)Google Scholar
  27. McCaig, T.N., DePauw, R.M., Clarke, J.M., McLeod, J.G., Fernandez, M.R., Knox, R.E. 1996. AC Barrie hard red spring wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 76:337–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McNeal, F.H. 1956. Inheritance of Stem Solidness and Spikelet Number in a Thatcher × Rescue Wheat Cross. US Dept. of Agriculture, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
  29. Morrill, W.L., Kushnak, G.D., Bruckner, P.L., Gabor, J.W. 1994. Wheat stem sawfly (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) damage, rates of parasitism, and overwinter survival in resistant wheat lines. J. Econ. Entomol. 87:1373–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nelson, W.A., Farstad, C.W. 1953. Biology of Bracon cephi (Gahan) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), an important native parasite of the wheat stem sawfly, Cephus cinctus Nort. (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) in western Canada. Can. Entomol. 85:103–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peterson, L.K., McKenzie, H., Holmes, N.D. 1968. Establishment of a nursery for evaluation of resistance of strains of wheat to the wheat stem sawfly. J. Econ. Entomol. 61:836–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Platt, A.W., Farstad, C.W. 1949. Breeding spring wheats for resistance to wheat stem sawfly attack. Proceedings of Seventh Pacific Science Congress 4:215–220.Google Scholar
  33. Platt, A.W., Farstad, C.W., Callenbach, J.A. 1948. The reaction of rescue wheat to sawfly damage. Sci. Agric. 28:154–161.Google Scholar
  34. Rand, T.A., Waters, D.K., Shanower, T.G., Berzonsky, W.A. 2012. Effects of genotypic variation in stem solidity on parasitism of a grass-mining insect. Basic Appl. Ecol. 13:250–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Runyon, J.B., Morrill, W.L., Weaver, D.K., Miller, P.R. 2002. Parasitism of the wheat stem sawfly (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) by Bracon cephi and B. lissogaster (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in wheat fields bordering tilled and untilled fallow in Montana. J. Econ. Entomol. 95:1130–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Salt, R.W. 1959. Role of glycerol in the cold-hardening of Bracon cephi (Gahan). Can. J. Zool. 37:59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. SAS Institute Inc. 2008. SAS OnlineDoc® 9.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  38. Townley-Smith, T.F., DePauw, R.M., Lendrum, C.W.B., McCrystal, G.E., Patterson, L.A. 1987. Kyle durum wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 67:225–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yamashita, K. 1937. Genetische Untersuchungen über den Markgehalt der Weizen-Halme (Genetic examination of the core content of wheat straw). Mem. Col. Agr., Kyoto Imp. Univ. 39:9–38.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2013

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • X. H. Wu
    • 1
    • 2
  • H. A. Cárcamo
    • 2
    Email author
  • B. L. Beres
    • 2
  • F. Clarke
    • 3
  • R. DePauw
    • 3
  • B. P. Pang
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Entomology, College of AgricultureInner Mongolia Agricultural UniversityInner MongoliaChina
  2. 2.Lethbridge Research CentreAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaLethbridge, AlbertaCanada
  3. 3.Semiarid Prairie Agricultural Research CentreAAFCSwift Current, SaskatchewanCanada

Personalised recommendations