Acta Biologica Hungarica

, Volume 59, Supplement 2, pp 163–172 | Cite as

Bilateral Symmetry in Crayfish Behavioral Reactions

  • Zhanna ShuranovaEmail author


The crayfish, Procambarus cubensis, placed in the central area of a plus-maze preferred to go forward in about 50% of trials; they chose the right or left arm in 20.7 and 18.9% of the trials, respectively. In a T-maze, the difference between right and left directions was also insignificant. When exploring a plusmaze, the crayfish turned to 180° at the end of the arms, then turned to 90° going to the next arm. The mean difference between the right and left U-turns, and the right and left turns was insignificant though some animals demonstrated a left or right preference. There was a strong correlation between the direction of U-turns and following turns ensuring the clockwise or anti-clockwise movements of the crayfish. Also we examined a possible preference of the right or left claw in the feeding behavior of the crayfish. The crayfish caught a small bloodworm given from above equally with the right or left claw. The crayfish conditioned to take a bloodworm with a claw did not demonstrate any stable preference of left or right claw in the course of the experiments. The question of bilateral asymmetries within the decapod crustaceans is discussed.


Crayfish plus-maze T-maze directional preference claw preference 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Baranyuk, G. V., Shishlov, S. B., Yakovlev, K. A. (1983) Study of visual and tactile sensory systems in various behaviors of the crayfish. In: Sologub, M. I. (ed.) The Mechanisms of Crustacean Motor Activity. LGPI im. Gertsena, Leningrad, pp. 11–21. (In Russian).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bisazza, A., Rogers, J., Vallortigara, G. (1998) The origins of cerebral asymmetry: A review of evidence of behavioural and brain lateralization in fishes, reptiles and amphibians. Neurosci. and Biobehav. Rev. 22, 411–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burmistrov, Yu. M., Shuranova, Zh. P. (1996) Individual features in invertebrate behavior: Crustacea. In: Abramson, C. I., Shuranova, Zh. P., Burmistrov, Yu. M. (eds) Russian Contributions to Invertebrate Behavior. Praeger, Westport, Connecticut, pp. 111–143.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burmistrov, Yu. M., Shuranova, Zh. P. (2003) Bilaterally symmetrical ventilatory activity in free moving crayfish. In: Elsner, N., Zimmermann, H. (eds) Proc. of the 29th Göttingen Neurobiology Conference and the 5th Meeting of the German Neurosci. Soc. Thieme, Stuttgart, p. 393.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crandall, K. A., Harris, D. J., Fetzner, J. W. (2000) The monophyletic origin of freshwater crayfish estimated from nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B267, 1679–1686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Govind, C. K. (1992) Claw asymmetry in lobsters: Case study in developmental neuroethology. J. Neurobiol. 23, 1423–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Govind, C. K., Pearce, J. (1992) Mechanoreceptors and minimal reflex activity determining claw laterality in developing lobsters. J. exp. Biol. 171, 149–162.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ioffe, M. E., Pletneva, E. V., Stashkevich, I. S. (2004) Functional motor asymmetries in animals. In: Fokin, V. F. (ed.) Hemispheric Functional Asymmetry. Nauchni Mir, Moskva, pp. 124–141. (In Russian).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kelly, T. M., Chapple, W. D. (1990) Kinematic analysis of the defense response in crayfish. J. Neurophysiol. 64, 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lnenicka, G. A., Atwood, H. L., Marin, L. (1986) Morphological transformation of synaptic terminals of a phasic motoneuron by long-term tonic stimulation. J. Neurosci. 6, 2252–2258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mariappan, P., Balansudaram, Ch., Schmitz, B. (2000) Decapod crustacean chelipeds: an overview. J. Biosci. 25, 301–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mearow, K. M., Govind, C. K. (1989) Stimulation-induced changes at crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) neuromuscular terminals. Cell Tissue Res. 256, 119–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Palmer, A. R. (1996) From symmetry to asymmetry. Phylogenetic patterns of asymmetry variation in animals and their evolutionary significance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 93, 14279–14286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rode, A. L., Babcock, L. E. (2003) Phylogeny of fossil and extant freshwater crayfish and some closely related nephropid lobsters. J. Crust. Biol. 23, 418–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosenberg, M. S. (2002) Fiddler crab claw shape variation: a geometric morphometric analysis across the genus Uca (Crustacea: Brachyura: Ocypodidae). Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 75, 147–162.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schram, F. R., Dixon, Ch. J. (2004) Decapod phylogeny: addition of fossil evidence to a robust morphological cladistic data set. Bull. Mizunami Fossil Museum no. 31, 1–19.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schwarting, K. W., Borta A. (2005) Analysis of behavioral asymmetries in the elevated plus-maze and in the T-maze. J. Neurosci. Methods 141, 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shuranova, Zh. P., Burmistrov, Yu. M. (1988) The Neurophysiology of the Crayfish. Nauka, Moskva. (In Russian).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shuranova, Zh., Burmistrov, Yu. (2006) Beatings of maxilliped flagellar exopodites in the crayfish as an overt expression of its excitation. In: Volkov, E. M., Gainutdinov, Kh. L. (eds) Simpler Nervous Systems. FizTechPress, Kazan, p. 78.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shuranova, Zh., Burmistrov, Yu., Abramson, Ch. I. (2005) Habituation to a novel environment in the crayfish Procambarus cubensis. J. Crust. Biol. 25, 488–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Udalova, G. P., Karas’, A. Ya. (2004) Asymmetry in direction of the movements in invertebrates. In: Fokin, V. F. (ed.) Hemispheric Functional Asymmetry. Nauchni Mir, Moskva, pp. 163–178. (In Russian).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Uziel, D., Lopes-Conceiçăo, M. C., Simpson, D., Lent, R. (1998) Ontogenesis of lateralized rotational behavior in hamsters: a time series study. Behav. Brain Res. 92, 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Várkonyi, P. L., Meszéna, G., Domokos, G. (2006) Emergence of asymmetry in evolution. Theoretical Population Biology 70, 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yerkes, R. M., Huggins, G. E. (1903) Habit formation in the crawfish Cambarus affinis. Harvard Psychol. Studies 1, 565–577.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2008

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow and Yu. Burmistrov Institute for Information Transmission ProblemsRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations