Advertisement

Acta Biologica Hungarica

, Volume 56, Issue 1–2, pp 53–65 | Cite as

Investigation of Chromosome Abnormalities and Early Embryonic Mortality in Goose Lines

  • Krisztina LiptóiEmail author
  • A. Hidas
  • R. Rouvier
Article

Abstract

Early embryonic mortality and chromosome abnormalities were studied in three goose lines: Grey Landes (line 7), White Polish (line 4) and their synthetic line (line 9). Eggs laid at the beginning, in the middle and at the end of the laying season were set. At candling at 5th day after egg set, all eggs (2847) were examined and those showing no normal embryonic development were opened 2847. Dead embryos were classified phenotypically and karyotyped. The mean ratio of embryonic mortality (EM) among fertile eggs was 9.4%, 5.2%, 7.3% in the lines 4, 7 and 9, respectively. The mean ratio of embryos with chromosomal abnormalities (CA) among the dead embryos was 8.0%, 14.8% and 13.1% in the lines 4, 7 and 9, respectively. Gander effect and layer within gander effect on embryo mortality were significant, indicating genetic factors. Father and mother of the layer effects were also significant, showing family effects. Animals producing dead embryos and embryos with chromosome abnormalities in high proportion were selected. In the selected groups the mean EM was 17.7–22.9%, and the mean CA was 11.7–34.7% among the three lines. The repetition of CA was not observed in the reproductive season of following year, while animals repeated the high EM (repeatability coefficient of 0.54). This shows that some part of EM may be resulted from other genetic factors. Ganders and layers progeny of these selected animals showed also high EM. It was concluded that culling pairs giving high EM value in their embryos could increase the average level of embryo viability and that the study of genetic determinism of that trait should be continued in geese.

Keywords

goose chromosome abnormalities early embryonic mortality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abbot, U. K., Yee, G. W. (1975) Avian genetics. In: King, R. C. (ed.) Handbook of Genetics. V.4. Plenum Publ. Corp. NY, pp. 151–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Batut, M. C. (1997) Logiciel de Gestion des Palmipèdes, Station d’Amélioration Génétique des Animaux. INRA, France (notice, 22 pages).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bitgood, J. J., Shoffner, R. N. (1990) Cytology and cytogenetics. In: Crawford, R. D. (ed.) Poultry Breeding and Genetics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 401–427.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Birkhead, T. R., Moller, A. P. (1992) Sperm competition in birds-Evolutionary Causes and Consequences. Academic Press, New York, 1992.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bloom, S. E. (1969) Chromosome abnormalities in early chicken (Gallus domesticus) embryos. Chromosoma (Berl.) 28, 357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bloom, S. E. (1970) Haploid chicken embryos: Evidence for diploid and triploid cell populations. J. Hered. 61, 147–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bloom, S. E., Buss, E. G. (1966) Triploid-diploid mosaic chicken embryo. Science 153, 759–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dupuy, V. (1996) Etude du dévéloppement embryonnaire entre le premier clivage et la 72éme heure d’incubation dans 2 souches de canard Pekin: classification et mesures quantitatives sur une série d’embryons normaux. Mémoire D.E.A. ENSA de Rennes.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eyal-Giladi, H., Kochav, S. (1976) From cleavage to primitive streak formation: a complementary normal table and a new look at the first stages of the development of the chick. Developmental Biology 19, 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fechheimer, N. S. (1977) Frequency and source of chromosome abnormalities in chicken embryos. Ann. Genet. Sel. Anim. 9, 541 (Abstract).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fechheimer, N. S. (1980) Origins of heteroploidy in chicken embryos. Poultry Sci. 60, 1365–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fechheimer, N. S. (1990) Chromosomes of chickens. In: McFeely, R. A. (ed.) Advances in Vetenary Science and Comparative Medicine: Domestic Animal Cytogenetics. Academic Press, Inc. New York, pp. 169–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hu, Y. H., Rouvier, R., Poivey, J. P., Brun, J. M., Sellier, N. (1997) Fertility and early embryonic viability in the intergeneric cross-breeding between muscovy drake and common duck females. Proceedings of 11th European Symp. on Waterfowl, Nantes, pp. 382–391.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Klein, S., Saar, W. (1992) Differences in egg phenotype in short term incubated goose eggs and their relationship to chromosome aberrations. 10th European Colloq. Cytogen. Domest. Anim. Utrecht Univ. Netherlands, Proc., pp. 116–121.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Larzul, C., Rouvier, R., Rousselot-Pailley, D., Guy, G. (2000) Estimation of genetic parameters for growth, carcass and overfeeding traits in a white geese strain. Genetics Selection Evolution 32, 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liptói, K., Hidas, A. (1997) Investigation of chromosomal abnormalities in goose breeding stocks. Int. Symp. Current Problems in Avian Reproduction. Wroclaw (Poland) Proceedings, pp. 205–206.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mong, S. J., Snyder, M. D., Fechheimer, N. S., Jaap, R. G. (1974) The origin of triploidy in chick (Gallus domesticus) embryos. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 16, 317–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Robertson, A., Lerner, I. M. (1949) The heritability of all or none traits: viability of poultry. Genetics 34, 395–411.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosiński, A., Bednarczyk, M. (1997) Influence of genotype on goose egg hatchability. Arch. Geflügelk. 61 (1), 33–39.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rouvier, R., Poujardieu, B., Chrysostome, C., Rousselot-Pailley, D. (1990) Expérimentation en selection de deux souches d’oies landaises (Anser anser): performances de reproduction. In: Les colloques de l’INRA, no 54, Control of fertility in domestic birds, Tours (France), July 2-4 1990. INRA Ed., Paris.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Savage, T. F., DeFrank, M. P., Brean, S. E. (1988) Blood ring: An early embryonic lethal condition in chicken. J. Hered. 79, 124–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Savage, T. F., Mirosh, L. W., Jones, J. L., Schneiderman, E. T. (1992) Blastoderm degeneration, an early embryonic failure in dwarf single comb white leghorn chikens. J. Hered. 83, 249–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Snedecor, G. W., Cochran, W. G. (1980) Statistical Methods, Seventh Edition. The Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Somes, R. G., Smyth, J. R. (1967) Prenatal, a sex-linked lethal mutation of the fowl. J. Hered. 58, 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Szalay, I. (1989) Cytogenetic aspects of early embryonic development in meat type poultry. PhD Thesis, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Telloni, R. V., Jaap, R. G., Fechheimer, N. S. (1976) Cytogenetic and phenotypic effects of chromosome rearrangement involving the Z-chromosome and microchromosome. Poultry Sci. 56, 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Thorne, M. H., Collins, R. K., Sheldon, B. L. (1985) A cytogenetic survey of early embryonic mortality in Australian layer and meat chickens. Proc. 6th Australian Poultry and Stockfeed Conv. Melbourne, pp. 287–292.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zartman, D. L., Smith, A. L. (1975) The effect of five different chromosome mutations on embryonic survival studied in chicken. Genetics 80, 87–88.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2005

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Small Animal ResearchGödöllőHungary
  2. 2.INRA - Station d’Amélioration Génétique des AnimauxCastanet-Tolosan CédexFrance

Personalised recommendations