Testing the full impact of neighbourhood crowding within natural vegetation requires more than just effects incurred by established plants. It must also include measurements that take into account suppressive effects on the earliest plant life stages of resident individuals — seeds, their germination (emergence of radicles and cotyledons), and very young rooted seedlings. In this study, we explored the potential for these effects in a field experiment spanning three years, using a novel design for controlling granivory and small mammal herbivory. This allowed us to assess the limitations of natural crowding on seed recruitment success for non-resident species introduced into both natural and denuded neighbourhood plots within a temperate mesic old field meadow in eastern Ontario, Canada. Our results show that crowding by standing vegetation of resident species caused an overall reduction of seed recruitment success by more than 90%. These data provide strong inference that suppression resulting directly from near neighbour effects are likely to impose routinely intense natural selection within temperate mesic old field habitats like our study site. The consequences of this selection, in terms of traits promoting plant fitness under competition, are traditionally interpreted in terms of superior resource depletion/uptake, typically associated with greater growth accumulation and larger potential body size. We suggest, however, that these consequences are rare. Individuals of any species approach maximum potential body size only when near neighbour effects are relatively weak — not within crowded neighbourhoods. Recent studies suggest that severe neighbourhood crowding (where virtually all resident plants are forced to remain relatively small) selects instead for ‘reproductive economy’ — i.e., capacity to produce at least a few (or even at least one) offspring despite severe body size suppression, involving a relatively small minimum reproductive threshold size. Potential for additional component traits of reproductive economy are also suggested for investigation in future research.
Aarssen, L.W. 1989. Competitive ability and species coexistence: a ‘plant’s eye’ view. Oikos 56:386–401.
Aarssen, L.W. 1992. Causes and consequences of variation in competitive ability in plant communities. J. Veg. Sci. 3:165–174.
Aarssen, L.W. 2005. Why don’t bigger plants have proportionately bigger seeds? Oikos 111:199–207.
Aarssen, L.W. 2008. Death without sex – the ‘problem of the small’ and selection for reproductive economy in flowering plants. Evol. Ecol. 22:279–298.
Aarssen, L.W. 2015. Body size and fitness in plants: revisiting the selection consequences of competition. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 17:236–242.
Aarssen, L.W. and G.A. Epp. 1990. Neighbour manipulations in natural vegetation: a review. J. Veg. Sci. 1:13–30.
Aarssen, L.W. and T. Keogh. 2002. Conundrums of competitive ability in plants: what to measure? Oikos 96:531–542.
Aschehoug, E.T., R. Brooker, D.Z. Atwater, J.L. Maron and R.M. Callaway. 2016. The mechanisms and consequences of interspecific competition among plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol, Evol. Syst. 47:263–281.
Brooker, R., Z. Kikvidze, G. Kustler, P. Liancourt and M. Seifan,. 2013. The concept and measurement of importance: a comment on Rees et al. 2012. J. Ecol. 101:1369–1378.
Bullock, J. 2000. Gaps and seedling colonization. In: Fenner M (ed) Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities, 2nd ed. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK. pp. 375–396.
Burke M.J.W. and J.P Grime. 1996. An experimental study of plant community invasibility. Ecology 77:776–790.
Damgaard, C. and A. Fayolle.. 2010. Measuring the importance of competition: a new formulation of the problem. J. Ecol. 98:1–6.
Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species. Murray, London.
Dombroskie, S.L., A.J. Tracey and L.W. Aarssen. 2016. Leafing intensity and the fruit size/number trade-off in woody angiosperms. J. Ecol. 104:1759–1767.
ECCC – Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2017. Canadian Climate Normals 1981–2010 Station Data. Retrieved September 13, 2017, from https://doi.org/climate.weather.gc.ca/climate_normals/results_1981_2010_e.html?searchType=stnName&txtStationName=Kingston&searchMethod=contains&txtCentralLatMin=0&txtCentralLatSec=0&txtCentralLongMin=0&txtCentralLongSec=0&stnID=4300&dispBack=1
Fayolle, A., C. Violle and M.L. Navas. 2009. Differential impacts of plant interactions on herbaceous species recruitment: disentangling factors controlling emergence, survival and growth of seedlings. Oecologia 159:817–825.
Foster, B. 1999. Establishment, competition and the distribution of native grasses among Michigan old-fields. J. Ecol. 87:476–489
Gleason, H.A. and A. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of the Vascular Plants of North-eastern United States and Adjacent Canada. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, N Y, USA
Goldberg, D.E. 1996. Competitive ability: definition, contingency and correlated traits. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351:1377–1385.
Goldberg, D.E. and A.M. Barton. 1992. Patterns and consequences of interspecific competition in natural communities: a review of field experiments with plants. Am. Nat. 139:771–801.
Gurevitch, J., L.L. Morrow, A. Wallace and J.S. Walsh. 1992. A meta-analysis of competition in field experiments. Am. Nat. 140:539–572.
Grace, J. B. 1990. On the relationship between plant traits and competitive ability. In: Grace, J. B. and Tilman, D. (eds), Perspectives on Plant Competition. Academic Press, New York. pp. 51–65.
Grime, J.P. 1979. Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. Wiley, New York.
Harper, J.L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, London.
Hart, S.P., R.P. Freckleton and J.M. Levine. 2018. How to quantify competitive ability. J. Ecol. 106:1902–1909.
Jutila, H.M. and J.B. Grace. 2002. Effects of disturbance on germination and seedling establishment in a coastal prairie grassland: a test of the competitive release hypothesis. J. Ecol. 90:291–302.
Keddy, P.A. 1989. Competition. Chapman and Hall, London.
Kikvidze, Z. and R. Brooker. 2010. Towards a more exact definition of the importance of competition — a reply to Freckleton et al. (2009). J. Ecol. 98:719–724.
Kleijn, D. 2003. Can establishment characteristics explain the poor colonization success of late successional grassland species on ex-arable land? Restor. Ecol. 11:131–138.
Knappova, J., M. Knapp and Z. Munzbergova. 2013. Spatiotemporal variation in contrasting effects of resident vegetation on establishment, growth and reproduction of dry grassland plants: Implications for seed addition experiments. PLoS ONE 8(6):e65879.
Miller, T. E. 1996. On quantifying the intensity of competition across gradients. Ecology 77:978–981.
Moles, A.T. and M. Westoby. 2004. What do seedlings die from and what are the implications for evolution of seed size? Oikos 106: 193–199.
Taylor, D.R. and L.W. Aarssen. 1990. Complex competitive relationships among genotypes of three perennial grasses: implications for species coexistence. Am. Nat. 136:305–327.
Thorpe, A.S., E.T. Aschehoug, D.Z. Atwater and R.M. Callaway. 2011. Interactions among plants and evolution. J. Ecol. 99:729–740.
Tracey, A.J. and L.W. Aarssen. 2014. Revising traditional theory on the link between plant body size and fitness under competition: evidence from old-field vegetation. Ecol. Evol. 4:959–967.
Tracey, A.J., and L.W. Aarssen. 2018. Resident species with larger size metrics do not recruit more offspring from the soil seed bank in old-field meadow vegetation. J. Ecol. (in press).
Tracey, A.J., K.A. Stephens, B.S. Schamp and L.W. Aarssen. 2016. What does body size mean, from the “plant’s eye view”? Ecol. Evol. 6:7344–7351.
Trinder, C.J., R.W. Brooker and D. Robinson. 2013. Plant ecology’s guilty little secret: understanding the dynamics of plant competition. Funct. Ecol. 27, Special Issue SI:918–929.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Tracey, A., Aarssen, L. Neighbourhood crowding severely limits seed offspring recruitment in a temperate mesic old-field meadow. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 19, 281–288 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2018.19.3.9
- Neighbour effects
- Reproductive economy
- Seed addition
- Vegetation clearing