We tested the application of the concept of hemeroby and generalism at community level, on a set of birds occurring in various habitats of central Italy characterized by different level of disturbance. In each habitat-related bird community, we applied the recently published species-specific score in hemeroby (a proxy of habitat-related disturbance; HSi) and hemerobiotic diversity (a proxy of generalism; H’Hi) to local species frequency, obtaining weighted values at community level (HStot and H’Htot). The relationship between HStot vs. H’Htot showed an increasing trend moving from reed beds through forests and mosaics to urban communities. Quadratic model (best fit) evidenced a significant correlation between these variables and a tendency toward a hump-shaped curve, corroborating results already observed at species level (intermediate generalism hypothesis). The co-inertia analysis discriminated four groups of habitat-related communities, characterized by species with different levels of disturbance-sensitivity (expressed by HSi) and generalism (expressed by hemerobiotic diversity; H’Hi): (i) forest type-related, where mature wood communities were separated from a coppiced wood one; (ii) communities of moderately disturbed agricultural habitats; (iii) communities embedded in highly disturbed mosaics, and (iv) a group including either a highly disturbed urban habitat or a low disturbed wetland reed bed, with highly specialized species (respectively, synanthropic species and water-related species). Total scores in hemeroby and hemerobiotic diversity, expressing the composition in species with different disturbance preference and generalism, might act as good community-based indicators of degree of naturalness, especially for forest habitat types.
Principal Components Analysis
Anderson, J.E. 1991. A conceptual framework for evaluating and quantifying naturalness. Conserv. Biol. 5:347–352.
Báldi, A. and Kisbenedek, T. 1999. Species-specific distribution of reed-nesting passerine birds across reed bed edges: effects of spatial scale and edge type. Acta Zool. Hung. 45:97–114.
Battisti, C, Capecchi, P. 2015. L’avifauna della Riserva naturale provinciale “Villa Borghese di Nettuno” (Italia centrale), con particolare riferimento alla composizione e struttura della comunità nidificante. Boll. Mus. Civ. St. Nat. Verona, Bot. Zool. 39:1–8.
Battisti, C. and Fanelli, G. 2011. Does human-induced heterogeneity differently affect diversity in vascular plants and breeding birds? Evidences from three Mediterranean forest patches. Rendiconti Lincei 22:25–30.
Battisti C. and Fanelli G. 2015a. Applying indicators of disturbance from plant ecology to vertebrates: The hemeroby of bird species. Ecol. Indic. 61:799–805.
Battisti, C. and Fanelli, G. 2015b. Don’t think local! Scale in conservation, parochialism, dogmatic bureaucracy and the implementing of the European Directives. J. Nat. Conserv. 24:24–30.
Battisti, C, Poeta, G. and Fanelli, G. 2016. An Introduction to Disturbance Ecology. A Road Map for Wildlife Management and Conservation. Springer, Cham, Switzerland.
Belmaker, J., Sekercioglu, C.H. and Jetz, W. 2012. Global patterns of specialization and coexistence in bird assemblages. J. Biogeogr. 39:193–203.
Benassi, G., Battisti, C., Luiselli, L. and Boitani, L. 2009. Area-sensitivity of three reed bed bird species breeding in Mediterranean marshland fragments. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 17:555–564.
Benton, T.G., Vickery, J.A. and Wilson, J.D. 2003. Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:182–188.
Bianconi R., Battisti C, Zapparoli M. 2004. Pattern of richness, abundance and diversity of four interior bird species in a hilly landscape in Central Italy: a contribution to assess their sensitivity to habitat fragmentation. J. Medit. Ecol. 4:37–44.
Bibby, C.J., Burgess, N.D., Hill, D.A. and Mustoe, S.H. 2000. Bird Census Techniques, 2nd ed. Academic Press, London.
Blair, R. 2004. The effects of urban sprawl on birds at multiple levels of biological organization. Ecology and Society 9(5):2. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss5/art2.
Bossel, H. 1999. Indicators for Sustainable Development: Theory Method, Applications. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg.
Bossuyt, B., Hermy, M. and Deckers, J. 1999. Migration of herbaceous plant species across ancient recent forest ecotones in central Belgium. J. Ecol. 87:517–527
Brawn, J. D., Robinson, S. K. and Thompson III, F. R. 2001. The role of disturbance in the ecology and conservation of birds. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32:251–276.
Canterbury, G.E., Martin, T.E., Petit, D.R., Petit, L.J. and Bradford, D.F. 2000. Bird communities and habitat as ecological indicators of forest condition in regional monitoring. Conserv. Biol. 14:544–558.
Clements, J.F. 2000. Birds of the World, a Checklist. Fifth edition, Ibis, Vista, Ca.
Crooks, K.R., Suarez, A.V. and Bolger, D.T. 2004. Avian assemblages along a gradient of urbanization in a highly fragmented landscape. Biol. Conserv. 115:451–462.
Devictor, V, Julliard, R., Clavel, J., Jiguet, F, Lee, A. and Couvet, D. 2008a. Functional biotic homogenization of bird communities in disturbed landscapes. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 17:252–261.
Devictor, V, Julliard, R. and Jiguet, F. 2008b. Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation. Oikos 117:507–514.
Devictor, V and Robert, A. 2009. Measuring community responses to large-scale disturbance in conservation biogeography Divers. Distrib. 15:122–130.
Dornelas, M. 2010. Disturbance and change in biodiversity. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365:3719–3727.
Ewers, R.M. and Didham, R.K. 2006. Confounding factors in detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol. Rev. 81:117–142.
Fanelli, G. and Battisti, C. 2014. Comparing disturbance-sensitivity between plants and birds: a fine-grained analysis in a suburban remnant wetland. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 60:11–17.
Fanelli, G. and Battisti C. 2015. Range of species occupancy, disturbance and generalism: applying hemeroby metrics to common breeding birds from a regional Atlas. Vie et Milieu – Life and Environment 65 (4):243–250.
Fanelli, G., Tescarollo, P. and Testi, A. 2005. Ecological indicators applied to urban and suburban floras. Ecol. Indic. 6:444–457.
Grabherr, G., Koch, G., Kirchmeir, H. and Reiter, K. 1998. Hemerobie österreichischer Waldökosysteme. Veröff. Des Österreichischen MAB-Programms 17:493 S.
Gregory, R.D., Noble, D., Field, R., Marchant, J., Raven, M. and Gibbons, D.W. 2003. Using birds as indicators of biodiversity. Ornis Hungarica 12:11–24.
Gregory, R. D., Noble D.G., and Custance, J. 2004. The state of play of farmland birds: population trends and conservation status of lowland farmland birds in the United Kingdom. Ibis 146 (s2):1–13.
Henle, K, Davies, K.F., Kleyer, M., Margules, C. and Settele, J. 2004. Predictors of species sensitivity to fragmentation. Biodiv Conserv. 13:207–251.
Hill, M.O., Roy, D.B. and Thompson, K. 2002. Hemeroby, urbanity and ruderality: bioindicators of disturbance and human impact. J. Appl. Ecol. 39:708–720.
Katayama, N, Amano, T, Naoe, S., Komatsu, I., Takagawa, S., Sato, N, Ueta, M. and Miyashita, T. 2014. Landscape heterogeneity-biodiversity relationship: effect of range size. PLOS One 9:e93359.
Koch, A.J., Drever, M.C and Martin, K. 2011. The effcacy of common species as indicators: avian responses to disturbance in British Columbia. Biodiv. Conserv. 20:3555–3575.
Kowarik, I. 1988. Zummenschlichen Einfluss auf Flora und Vegetation: Theoretische Konzepte und ein Quanti fizierungsansatz am Beispiel von Berlin (West). Landschafltsentwicklung und Umweltforschung, Schriftenreihe des Fachbereichs Landschaftsentwicklung der TU Berlin Vol. 56:241.
Julliard, R., Clavel, J., Devictor, V, Jiguet, F. and Couvet, D. 2006. Spatial segregation of specialists and generalists in bird communities. Ecol. Lett. 9:1237–1244.
Lack, PC. 1986. The Atlas of Wintering Birds in Britain and Ireland. TAD Poyser, London.
Malavasi, R., Battisti, C. and Carpaneto, G.M. 2009. Seasonal bird assemblages in a Mediterranean patchy wetland: corroborating the intermediate disturbance hypothesis. Pol. J. Ecol. 57:171–179.
Marzluff, J.M., Bowman, R. and Donnelly, R. (eds.) 2001. Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York.
Matthysen, E., Lens, L., Van Dongen, S., Verheyen, G.R., Wauters, L.A., Adriaensen, F. and Dhondt, A.A. 1995. Diverse effects of forest fragmentation on a number of animal species. Belg. J. Zool. 125:175–183.
Morelli, F., Benedetti, Y., Ibáñez Álamo, J. D., Jokimäki, J., Mänd, R., Tryjanowski, P. and Møller, A.P. 2016. Evidence of evolutionary homogenization of bird communities in urban environments across Europe. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25 :1284–1293.
Mouillot, D., Graham, N.A.J., Villéger, S. and Mason, N.W.H. 2013. A functional approach reveals community responses to disturbances. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28:167–177.
Paracuellos, M. 2006. Relationship of song bird occupation with habitat configuration and bird abundance in patchy reed beds. Ardea 94:87–98
Peterken, G.F. 1974. A method for assessing woodland flora for conservation using indicator species. Biol. Conserv. 6:239– 247.
R Core Team . 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Redolfi De Zan, L., Rossi de Gasperis S., Fiore L., Battisti, C. and Carpaneto, G.M. 2016. The importance of dead wood for holenesting birds: a two years study in three beech forests of central Italy. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. DOI: 10.1080/15659801.2016.1191168.
Reif, A. and Walentowski, H. 2008 The assessment of naturalness and its role for nature conservation and forestry in Europe. Waldökologie, Landschaftsforschung und Naturschutz 6:63–76.
Reif, J., Marhoul, P. and Koptík, J. 2013. Bird communities in habitats along a successional gradient: Divergent patterns of species richness, specialization and threat. Basic Appl. Ecol. 14:423–431.
Rossi de Gasperis, S., Redolfi De Zan, L., Battisti, C., Reichegger, I. and Carpaneto, G.M. 2016. Distribution and abundance of holenesting birds in Mediterranean forests: impact of past management patterns on habitat preference. Ornis Fenn. 93:100–110.
Schleupner, C. and Schenider, U.A. 2013. Allocation of European wetland restoration options for systematic conservation planning. Land Use Policy 30:604–614.
Sharrock, J.T.R. 1976. The Atlas of Breeding Birds in Britain and Ireland. T. and A.D. Poyser, London.
Steinhardt, U., Herzog, F., Lausch, A., Miller, E. and Lehmann, S. 1999. Hemeroby index for landscape monitoring and evaluation. In: Pykh, Y.A. et al. (eds.), Environmental Indices – System Analysis Approach. EOLSS Publishing, Oxford, pp. 237–254.
Sousa, W.P. 1984. The role of disturbance in natural communities. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15:353–391.
Suárez-Soane, S., Osborne, P.E., Alonso, J.C. 2002. Large-scale habitat selection by agricultural steppe birds in Spain: identifying species-habitat responses using generalized additive models. J. Appl. Ecol. 39:755–771.
Taffon, D. and Battisti, C. 2005. Breeding bird communities and ecotope niche breadth of the species in a heterogeneous landscape of Central Italy. Riv. ital. Ornitol., Research in Ornitology 75:129–139.
ter Braak, C.J.F. and Barendregt, L.G. 1986. Weighted averaging of species indicator values: its effciency in environmental calibration. Math. Biosci. 78:57–72.
ter Braak, C. J. F. and Schaffers, A.P. 2004. Co-correspondence analysis: a new ordination method to relate two community compositions. Ecology 85:834–846.
Testi, A., Guidotti, S., Bisceglie, S. and Fanelli, G. 2009. Detecting river environmental quality through plant and macroinvertebrate indicators in the Aniene River (Central Italy). Aquat. Ecol. 43:477–486.
Villard, M.-A. 1998. On forest-interior species, edge avoidance, area sensitivity, and dogma in avian conservation. Auk 115:801–805.
Villard, M.-A. and Jonsson, B.G. 2009. Setting Conservation Targets for Managed Forest Landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Vuerich, V., Bologna, M.A. and Battisti, C. 2006. Comunità ornitiche nidificanti in tre tipologie vegetazionali lungo un gradiente altitudinale nei monti Simbruini (Lazio, Appennini centrali) (Aves). Aldrovandia 2:49–53.
Wiens, J.A. 1989. The Ecology of Bird Communities. Vols. 1–2. Cambridge studies in ecology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Winter, S. 2012. Forest naturalness assessment as a component of biodiversity monitoring and conservation management. Forestry 85:293–304.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Battisti, C., Fanelli, G., Pavel, D. et al. Assessing habitat-related disturbance in bird communities: Applying hemeroby and generalism as indicators. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 18, 215–223 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2017.18.2.11
- Habitat-related communities
- Hemeroby score
- Hemerobiotic diversity score
- Hump-shaped pattern
- Intermediate generalism hypothesis