Comparing the accuracy of three non-destructive methods in estimating aboveground plant biomass
Aboveground plant biomass is one of the most important features of ecosystems, and it is widely used in ecosystem research. Non-destructive biomass estimation methods provide an important toolkit, because the destructive harvesting method is in many cases not feasible. However, only few studies have compared the accuracy of these methods in grassland communities to date. We studied the accuracy of three widely used methods for estimation of aboveground biomass: the visual cover estimation method, the point intercept method, and field spectroscopy. We applied them in three independent series of field samplings in semi-arid sand grasslands in Central Hungary. For each sampling method, we applied linear regression to assess the strength of the relationship between biomass proxies and actual aboveground biomass, and used coefficient of determination to evaluate accuracy. We found no evidence that the visual cover estimation, which is generally considered as a subjective method, was less accurate than point intercept method or field spectroscopy in estimating biomass. Based on our three datasets, we found that accuracy was lower for the point intercept method compared to the other two methods, while field spectroscopy and visual cover estimation were similar to each other in the semi-arid sand grassland community. We conclude that visual cover estimation can be as accurate for estimating aboveground biomass as other approaches, thus the choice amongst the methods should be based on additional pros and cons associated with each of the method and related to the specific research objective.
KeywordsBiomass proxies Coefficient of determination Field experiment Field spectroscopy Point intercept method Semi-arid grassland Visual cover estimation
Aboveground Net Primary Productivity
Normalized Differential Vegetation Index
NomenclatureThe Plant List (2010)
- Braun-Blanquet, J. 1932. Plant Sociology. The Study of Plant Communities. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
- Canfield, R.H. 1941. Application of the line interception method in sampling range vegetation. J. For. 39: 388–394.Google Scholar
- Faraway, J.J. 2005. Linear Models with R. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
- Greig-Smith, P. 1983. Quantitative Plant Ecology. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
- Hahn, I. and Scheuring, I. 2003. The effect of measurement scales on estimating vegetation cover: a computer-assisted experiment. Community Ecol. 4: 29–33.Google Scholar
- Jobbágy, E.G., Sala, O.E. and Paruelo, J.M. 2002. Patterns and controls of primary production in the Patagonian steppe: a remote sensing approach. Ecology 83: 307–319.Google Scholar
- Kovács-Láng, E., Kröel-Dulay, G., Kertész, M., Fekete, G., Mika, J., Dobi-Wantuch, I., Rédei, T., Rajkai, K., Hahn, I. and Bartha, S. 2000. Changes in the composition of sand grasslands along a climatic gradient in Hungary and implications for climate change. Phytocoenologia 30: 385–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kovács-Láng, E., Molnár, E., Kröel-Dulay, G. and Barabás, S. 2008. The KISKUN LTER: Long-term ecological research in the Kiskunság, Hungary. Institute of Ecology and Botany, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Vácrátót.Google Scholar
- Kröel-Dulay, G., Ransijn, J., Schmidt, I.K., Beier, C., De Angelis, P., de Dato, G., Dukes, J.S., Emmett, B., Estiarte, M., Garadnai, J., Kongstad, J., Kovács-Láng, E., Larsen, K.S., Liberati, D., Ogaya, R., Riis-Nielsen, T., Smith, A.R., Sowerby, A., Tietema, A. and Penuelas, J. 2015. Increased sensitivity to climate change in disturbed ecosystems. Nat. Commun. 6: 6682 doi:10.1038/ ncomms7682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Molnár, Z. 2003. Sanddunes in Hungary (Kiskunság). TermészetBÚVÁR Alapítvány Kiadó, Budapest.Google Scholar
- Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.R. and White, P.S. 1998. A flexible, multipurpose method for recording vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63: 262–274.Google Scholar
- Peñuelas, J., Prieto, P., Beier, C., Cesaraccio, C., De ANGELIS, P., De DATO, G., Emmett, B.A., Estiarte, M., Garadnai, J., Gorissen, A., Láng, E.K., Kröel-Dulay, G., Llorens, L., Pellizzaro, G., Riis-Nielsen, T., Schmidt, I.K., Sirca, C., Sowerby, A., Spano, D. and Tietema, A. 2007. Response of plant species richness and primary productivity in shrublands along a north–south gradient in Europe to seven years of experimental warming and drought: reductions in primary productivity in the heat and drought year of 2003. Glob. Change Biol. 13: 2563–2581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- R Core Team, 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/.
- Rouse, J.W., Haas, R.H., Deering, D.W., Schell, J.A. and Harlan, J.C. 1974. Monitoring the vernal advancement and retrogradation (green wave effect) of natural vegetation. NASA/GSFCT Type III Final Report, Greenbelt, MD, USA.Google Scholar
- The Plant List, 2010. Version 1. Published on the Internet; http://www.theplantlist.org/ (accessed 1st January).
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.