Studies of perennial plants generally search for a seed size vs. seed number trade-off. Surprisingly, the fact that perennials may replace an investment in large seeds by the allocation to vegetative propagation has not yet been investigated as an additional pathway enabling species coexistence. We focused on the mechanisms of coexistence in Carex elata and C. elongata, two co-occurring clonal sedges dominant in European swamp alder forests. We asked the following questions: i) Is the number of germinated seeds a better predictor of species coexistence than the total number of seeds? ii) What recruitment conditions and competition rules determine vegetative sprouting to be an alternative to large, competitively superior seeds? We measured several species functional traits related to the colonisation and fitness of perennials. To examine the competitive hierarchy between species and microsite species preferences, we analysed the effects of environmental factors and plant densities on fitness-related traits using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). Then, using a series of spatially explicit simulations partly parameterised based on the field measurement, we evaluated the importance of seed and ramet propagation and recruitment conditions for long-term species coexistence. SEM indicated a competitive hierarchy and a large overlap in microsite preferences between species. As a response to our initial questions we found that: i) Only differences in the numbers of germinated seeds, allowed the two species to coexist. If we consider only differences in the total number of seeds, the superior competitor (Carex elata) outcompeted the inferior competitor (C. elongata) in all scenarios. This is because the former produced about three-times as many seeds as the latter. ii) We show that vegetative sprouting represents an additional pathway for the seed size-number trade-off when the competitive superiority of species is attributed to vegetative propagation. This is another way that a species deals with the omnipresent seeds of other species. Taken together, our study demonstrates that differences in seed performance, coupled with differences in vegetative propagation related to competitive ability, are an additional mechanism allowing the coexistence of perennial plants.
Comparative Fit Index
Generalised Linear Mixed Model
Maximum Likelihood Method
Root Mean Square Error of Approximation Index
Structural Equation Modelling
Spatial Eigenvalue Vector Mapping
Abrahamson, W.A. 1980. Demography and vegetative reproduction. In: O.T. Solbrig (ed.), Demography and Evolution in Plant Populations. University of California Press, Los Angeles. pp. 89–106.
Baskin, C.C. and Baskin, J.M. 2014. Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. 2nd ed. Elsevier/ Academic Press, San Diego.
Beatty, S.W. 1984. Influence of microtopography and canopy species on spatial patterns of forest understory plants. Ecology 65:1406–1419.
Ben-Hur, E., Fragman-Sapir, O., Hadas, R., Singer, A. and Kadmon, R. 2012. Functional trade-offs increase species diversity in experimental plant communities. Ecol. Lett. 15:1276–1282.
Benot, M.-L., Bittebiere, A.-K., Ernoult, A., Clément, B. and Mony, C. 2013. Fine-scale spatial patterns in grassland communities depend on species clonal dispersal ability and interactions with neighbours. J. Ecol. 101:626–636.
Bierzychudek, P. 1982. Life histories and demography of shade-tolerant temperate forest herbs: a review. New Phytol. 90:757–776.
Bollen, K.A. and Long, J.S. 1993. Testing Structural Equation Models. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
Bruelheide, H. and Udelhoven, P. 2005. Correspondence of the fine-scale spatial variation in soil chemistry and the herb layer vegetation in beech forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 210:205–223.
Bullock, J.M., Hill, B.C., Silvertown, J. and Sutton, M. 1995. Gap colonization as a source of grassland community change: effects of gap size and grazing on the rate and mode of colonization by different species. Oikos 72:273–282.
Cadotte, M.W. 2007. Concurrent niche and neutral processes in the competition-colonization model of species coexistence. Proc. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 274:2739–2744.
Canham, C.D. 1988. An index for understory light levels in and around canopy gaps. Ecology 69:1634–1638.
Charpentier, A., Grillas, P. and Thompson, J.D. 2000. The effects of population size limitation on fecundity in mosaic populations of the clonal macrophyte Scirpus maritimus (Cyperaceae). Am. J. Bot. 87:502–507.
Cheplick, G.P. 1995. Life history trade-offs in Amphibromus scabrivalvis (Poaceae): allocation to clonal growth, storage, and cleis-togamous reproduction. Am. J. Bot. 82:621–629.
Cheplick, G.P. 1997. Responses to severe competitive stress in a clonal plant: differences between genotypes. Oikos 79:581–591.
Chesson, P. and Huntly, N. 1997. The roles of harsh and fluctuating conditions in the dynamics of ecological communities. Am. Nat. 150:519–553.
Douda, J. 2010. The role of landscape configuration in plant composition of floodplain forests across different physiographic areas. J. Veg. Sci. 21:1110–1124.
Douda, J., Boublík, K., Slezák, M., Biurrun, I., Nociar, J., Havrdová, A., Doudová, J., Aćić, S., Brisse, H., Brunet, J., Chytrý, M., Claessens, H., Csiky, J., Didukh, Y., Dimopoulos, P., Dullinger, S., FitzPatrick, Ú., Guisan, A., Horchler, P.J., Hrivnák, R., Jandt, U., Kącki, Z., Kevey, B., Landucci, F., Lecomte, H., Lenoir, J., Paal, J., Paternoster, D., Pauli, H., Pielech, R., Rodwell, J.S., Roelandt, B., Svenning, J.-C., Šibík, J., Šilc, U., Škvorc, Ž., Tsiripidis, I., Tzonev, R.T., Wohlgemuth, T. and Zimmermann, N.E. 2016. Vegetation classification and biogeography of European floodplain forests and alder carrs. Appl. Veg. Sci. 19:147–163.
Douda, J., Doudová-Kochánková, J., Boublík, K. and Drašnarová, A. 2012. Plant species coexistence at local scale in temperate swamp forest: test of habitat heterogeneity hypothesis. Oecologia 169:523–534.
Dormann, C.F., McPherson, J.M., Araújo, M.B., Bivand, R., Bolliger, J., Carl, G., Davies, R.G., Hirzel, A., Jetz, W., Kissling, W.D., Kühn, I., Ohlemüller, R., Peres-Neto, P.R., Reineking, B., Schröder, B., Schurr, F.M. and Wilson, R. 2007. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 30:609–628.
Eckert, C.G. 2002. The loss of sex in clonal plants. Evol. Ecol. 15:501–520.
Egler, F.E. 1954. Vegetation science concepts I. Initial floristic composition, a factor in old-field vegetation development. Vegetatio 4:412–417.
Elias, R.B. and Dias, E. 2009. The effects of landslides on the mountain vegetation of Flores Island, Azores. J. Veg. Sci. 20: 706–717.
Eriksson, O. 2005. Game theory provides no explanation for seed size variation in grasslands. Oecologia 144:98–105.
Eriksson, O. 2011. Niche shifts and seed limitation as mechanisms behind seedling recruitment patterns in clonal plants. Preslia 83:301–314.
Eriksson, O. and Jakobsson, A. 1998. Abundance, distribution and life histories of grassland plants: a comparative study of 81 species. J. Ecol. 86:922–933.
Fang, X., Yuan, J., Wang, G. and Zhao, Z. 2006. Fruit production of shrub, Caragana korshinskii, following above-ground partial shoot removal: mechanisms underlying compensation. Plant Ecol. 187:213–225.
Fischer, M. and van Kleunen, M. 2002. On the evolution of clonal plant life histories. Evol. Ecol. 15:565–582.
Fukami, T. 2004. Assembly history interacts with ecosystem size to influence species diversity. Ecology 85:3234–3242.
Fox, J.W. 2013. The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28:86–92.
Frazer, G.W., Canham, C.D. and Lertzman, K.P. 1999. Gap Light Analyzer (GLA), Version 2.0: Imaging software to extract canopy structure and gap light transmission indices from true-colour fisheye photographs, users manual and program documentation. Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada: Simon Fraser University and Millbrook, New York, NY: the Institute of Ecosystem Studies.
Geritz, S.A., van der Meijden, E. and Metz, J.A. 1999. Evolutionary dynamics of seed size and seedling competitive ability. Theor. Popul. Biol. 55:324–343.
Gilbert, B. and Lechowicz, M.J. 2004. Neutrality, niches, and dispersal in a temperate forest understory. PNAS 101:7651–7656.
Grace, J.B. 2006. Structural Equation Modeling and Natural Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Grime, J.P. 1998. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. J. Ecol. 86:902–910.
Grman, E. and Suding, K.N. 2010. Within-year soil legacies contribute to strong priority effects of exotics on native California grassland communities. Rest. Ecol. 18:664–670.
Guo, Q., Brown, J.H., Valone, T.J. and Kachman, S.D. 2000. Constraints of seed size on plant distribution and abundance. Ecology 81:2149–2155.
Handel, S.N. 1985. The intrusion of clonal growth patterns on plant breeding systems. Am. Nat. 125:367–384.
Harper, J.L. 1967. A Darwinian approach to plant ecology. J. Ecol. 55:247–270.
Herben, T., Nováková, Z., Klimešová, J. and Hrouda, L. 2012. Species traits and plant performance: functional trade-offs in a large set of species in a botanical garden. J. Ecol. 100:1522–1533.
Huston, M.A. 1979. A general hypothesis of species diversity. Am. Nat. 113:81–101.
Lande, R.1993. Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes. Am. Nat. 142:911–927
Lee, T.D. 1988. Patterns of fruit and seed production. In: J. Lovett Doust and L. Lovett Doust (eds.), Plant Reproductive Ecology: Patterns and Strategies. Oxford University Press, New York. pp. 179–202.
Leishman, M.R. 2001. Does the seed size/number trade-off model determine plant community structure? An assessment of the model mechanisms and their generality. Oikos 93:294–302.
Meekins, J.F. and McCarthy, B.C. 2000. Responses of the biennial forest herb Alliaria petiolata to variation in population density, nutrient addition and light availability. J. Ecol. 88:447–463.
Muller-Landau, H.C. 2010. The tolerance-fecundity trade-off and the maintenance of diversity in seed size. PNAS 107:4242–4247.
Platt, W.J. 1975. The colonization and formation of equilibrium plant species associations on badger disturbances in a tall-grass prairie. Ecol. Monog. 45:285–305.
Rangel, T.F., Diniz-Filho, J.A.F. and Bini, L.M. 2010. SAM: a comprehensive application for Spatial Analysis in Macroecology. Ecography 33:46–50.
R Core Team 2015. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Rees, M. 1995. Community structure in sand dune annuals: is seed weight a key quantity? J. Ecol. 83:857–863.
Reynolds, H.L., Mittelbach, G.G., Darcy-Hall, T.L., Houseman, G.R. and Gross, K.L. 2007. No effect of varying soil resource heterogeneity on plant species richness in a low fertility grassland. J. Ecol. 95:723–733.
Rosseel, Y. 2012. lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. J. Stat. Softw. 48:1–36.
Scheller, R.M. and Mladenoff, D.J. 2002. Understory species patterns and diversity in old-growth and managed northern hardwood forests. Ecol. Appl. 12:1329–1343.
Schütz, W. 2000. Ecology of seed dormancy and germination in sedges (Carex). Perspect. Plant. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 3:67–89.
Schütz, W. and Rave, G. 2003. Variation in seed dormancy of the wetland sedge, Carex elongata, between populations and individuals in two consecutive years. Seed. Sci. Res. 13:315–322.
Shaffer, M. 1981. Minimum population sizes for species conservation. BioScience 31:131–134.
Shipley, B. 2004. Analysing the allometry of multiple interacting traits. Perspect. Plant. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 6:235–241.
Soetaert, K. and Herman, P.M.J. 2009. A Practical Guide to Ecological Modelling. Using R as a Simulation Platform. Springer, Dordrecht.
Thompson, F.L. and Eckert, C.G. 2004. Trade-offs between sexual and clonal reproduction in an aquatic plant: experimental manipulations vs. phenotypic correlations. J. Evol. Biol. 17:581–592.
Tilman, D. 1994. Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75:2–16.
van de Koppel, J. and Crain, C.M. 2006. Scale-dependent inhibition drives regular tussock spacing in a freshwater marsh. Am. Nat. 168:136–147.
van Drunen, W.E. and Dorken, M.E. 2012. Trade-offs between clonal and sexual reproduction in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae) scale up to affect the fitness of entire clones. New Phytol. 196:606–616.
Weiner, J., Campbell, L.G., Pino, J. and Echarte, L. 2009. The allometry of reproduction within plant populations. J. Ecol. 97:1220– 1233.
Weppler, T., Stoll, P. and Stöcklin, J. 2006. The relative importance of sexual and clonal reproduction for population growth in the long-lived alpine plant Geum reptans. J. Ecol. 94:869–879.
Wijesinghe, D.K., John, E.A. and Hutchings, M.J. 2005. Does pattern of soil resource heterogeneity determine plant community structure? An experimental investigation. J. Ecol. 93:99–112.
Williams, R.D., Quimby, Jr. P.C. and Frick, K.E. 1977. Intraspecific competition of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) under greenhouse conditions. Weed Sci. 25:477–481.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Douda, J., Hulík, J. & Doudová, J. Vegetative sprouting as an additional pathway for a seed size-number trade-off: a field-parameterised simulation approach. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 17, 205–215 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2016.17.2.9
- Carex elata
- Carex elongata
- Competition-colonisation trade-off
- Functional traits
- Spatially explicit models
- Structural equation models
- Wetland forests