Abandonment of crop lands leads to different recovery patterns for ant and plant communities in Eastern Europe

Abstract

Significant proportion of crop lands have been abandoned as management strategies have changed in Central and Eastern Europe in the past decades. The study of insect versus plant communities in such areas could help us understand how these processes take place, and whether these communities return to a semi-natural state maintained by human activities. Amongst insects ants, as ecosystem engineers, are a perfect target group in this respect. We studied epigaeic ant and plant communities of abandoned old-fields in Romania. Contrary to our expectations, the total number of ant species did not increase with time during succession on old-fields contrary to plants, where an increase was registered in the total number. Disturbancetolerant ant species dominated the ant communities throughout the successional gradient, while in the case of plants a transition was found from weed-dominated to semi-natural communities. The diversity of both ant and plant communities increased after the 1-year stage, but the patterns were different. While a return to semi-natural state could be observed in plants during old-field succession, such a definite change did not occur in ants. This might be caused by the landscape context: the lack of connectivity of old-fields to larger natural areas. While plant propagules of semi-natural and natural habitat species can still successfully colonize the old fields even under such conditions, ant colonizers are mainly disturbance-tolerant species typical for agricultural areas, which can be hardly replaced by typical grassland species. Our findings underline the existence of important discrepancies between plant and ant community succession, mostly treated as paralleling each other. This is the first study to handle the effect of abandonment on ant and plant communities simultaneously in Eastern Europe.

References

  1. Agosti, D., J.D. Majer, L.E. Alonso and T.R. Schultz. 2000. Ants: Standard Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andersen, N.A. 1997. Functional groups and patterns of organization in North American ant communities: a comparison with Australia. J. Biogeogr. 24: 433–460.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Batáry, P., A. Báldi, M. Sárospataki, F. Kohler, J. Verhulst, E. Knop, F. Herzog and D. Kleijn. 2010. Effect of conservation management on bees and insect-pollinated grassland plant communities in three European countries. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 136: 35–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baur, B., C. Cremene, G. Groza, L. Rákosy, A.A. Schileyko, A. Baur and A. Erhardt. 2006. Effects of abandonment of subalpine hay meadows on plant and invertebrate diversity in Transylvania, Romania. Biol. Conserv. 132: 261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernadou, A., R. Céréghino, H. Barcet, M. Combe, X. Espadaler and V. Fourcassié. 2013. Physical and land-cover variables influence ant functional groups and species diversity along elevational gradients. Landscape Ecol. 28: 1387–1400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ciaian, P. and J. Pokrivcak. 2007. Agriculture reforms and development in East-Central Europe, 117–132. In: Sergi, B.S., Bagatelas, W.T. and Kubicova, J. (eds): Industries and Markets in Central and Eastern Europe. Ashgate Publ., Aldershot, Burlington, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Csergő, A.M., L. Demeter and R. Turkington. 2013. Declining diversity in abandoned grasslands of the Carpathian Mountains: Do dominant species matter? PLoS ONE 8(8): e73533.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Czechowski, W., A. Radchenko, W. Czechowska and K. Vepsäläinen. 2012. The Ants of Poland with Reference to the Myrmecofauna of Europe. Fauna Poloniae, Vol. 4. Natura Optima Dux Foundation, Warsaw.

  9. Czekes, Zs., B. Markó, D.R. Nash, M. Ferencz, B. Lázár and L. Rákosy. 2014. Differences in oviposition strategies between two ecotypes of the endangered myrmecophilous butterfly Maculinea alcon (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) under unique syntopic conditions. Insect Conserv. Divers. 7: 122–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Czekes, Zs., A.G. Radchenko, S. Csősz, A.M. Szász-Len, I. Tăuşan, K. Kiss and B. Markó. 2012. The genus Myrmica Latreille, 1804 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Romania: distribution of species and key for their identification. Entomologica Romanica 17: 29–50.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dauber, J. and V. Wolters. 2005. Colonization temperate grassland by ants. Basic Appl. Ecol. 6: 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dorresteijn, I., J. Hanspach, A. Kecskés, H. Latková, Zs. Mezey, Sz. Sugár, H. von Wehrden and J. Fischer. 2014. Human-carnivore coexistence in a traditional rural landscape. Landscape Ecol. 29: 1145–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Englisch, T., F.M. Steiner and B.C. Schlick-Steiner. 2005. Fine-scale grassland assamblage analysis in Central Europe: ants tell another story than plants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae; Spermatophyta). Myrmecol. Nachr. 7: 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fischer, J., T. Hartel and T. Kuemmerle. 2012. Conservation policy in traditional farming landscapes. Conserv. Lett. 5: 167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Folgarait, P.J. 1998. And biodiversity and its relationship to ecosystem functioning: a review. Biodivers. Conserv. 7: 1221–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gallé, L., L. Körmöczi, E. Hornung and J. Kerekes. 1998. Structure of ant assamblages in a Middle-European sucessional sand-dune area. Tiscia 31: 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gallé, R. and A. Torma. 2009. Epigeic spider (Araneae) assemblages of natural forest edges in the Kiskunság (Hungary). Community Ecol. 10: 146–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Goslee, S.C. and D.L. Urban. 2007. The ecodist package for dissimilarity-based analysis of ecological data. J. Stat. Softw. 22: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hartel, T., I. Dorresteijn, C. Klein, O. Máthé, C.I. Moga, K. Öllerer, and J. Fischer. 2013. Wood-pastures in a traditional rural region of Eastern Europe: Characteristics, management and status. Biol. Conserv. 166: 267–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hartel, T., T. Sos, V.D. Popescu, R.I. Băncilă, D. Cogălniceanu and L. Rozylowicz. 2014. Amphibian conservation in traditional cultural landscapes : the case of Central Romania. North-West. J. Zool. 10: 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Holec, M. and J. Frouz. 2005. Ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) communities is reclaimed and unreclaimed brown coal mining spoil dumps in Czech Republic. Pedobiologia 49: 345–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hölldobler, B. and E.O. Wilson. 1990. The Ants. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. pp.1–732.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Jongepierová, J., J.W. Jongepier and L. Klimeš. 2004. Restoring grassland on arable land: an example of a fast spontaneous succession without weed-dominated stages. Preslia 76: 361–369.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kun, A., E. Ruprecht, S. Bartha, A. Szabó and K. Virágh. 2007. Az Erdélyi Mezőség kincse: a gyepvegetáció egyedülálló gazdagsága (Unique diversity of grassland in the Transylvanian Lowland). Kitaibelia 12: 88–96.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Magura, T., D. Bogyó, S. Mizser, D.D. Nagy and B. Tóthmérész. 2015. Recovery of ground-dwelling assemblages during reforestation with native oak depends on the mobility and feeding habits of the species. Forest Ecol. Manag. 339: 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Majer, J.D. 1996. Ant recolonization of rehabilitated bauxite mines at Trombates, Para Brazil. J. Trop. Ecol. 12: 257–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Markó, B., B. Sipos, S. Csősz, K. Kiss, I. Boros and L. Gallé. 2006. A comprehensive list of the ants of Romania (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol. Nachr. 9: 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Matus, G., R. Verhagen, R.M. Bekker and A.P. Grootjans. 2003. Restoration of the Cirsio dissecti-Molinietum in The Netherlands: can we rely on soil seed banks? Appl. Veg. Sci. 6: 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mills, L.S., M.E. Soulé and D.F. Doak. 1993. The keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation. BioSci. 43: 219–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Moga, C.I., T. Hartel and K. Öllerer. 2010. Status, microhabitat use and distribution of the corncrake Crex crex in a Southern Transylvanian rural landscape, Romania. North-West. J. Zool. 6: 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Molnár, Zs. and Z. Botta-Dukát. 1998. Improved space-for-time substitution for hypothesis generation: secondary grasslands with documented site history in SE-Hungary. Phytocoenologia 28: 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Oksanen, J., F. Guillaume Blanchet, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, P.R. Minchin, R.B. O’Hara, G.L. Simpson, P. Solymos, M. Henry, M.H. Stevens, H. Wagner and M.J. Oksanen. 2013. Package ‘vegan’. R. Package ver. 254: 20–8.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ottonetti, L., L. Tucci and G. Santini. 2006. Recolonization patterns of ant in a rehabilitated lignite mine in Central Italy: Potential for use of Mediterranean ants as indicators of restoration processes. Restor. Ecol. 14: 60–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Plieninger, T., T. Hartel, B. Martín-López, G. Beaufoy, E. Bergmeier, K. Kirby, M.J. Montero, G. Moreno, E. Oteros-Rozas and J. Van Uytvanck. 2015. Wood-pastures of Europe: Geographic coverage, social-ecological values, conservation management, and policy implications. Biol. Conserv. 190: 70–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pohlert, T. (2014). The Pairwise Multiple Comparison of Mean Ranks Package (PMCMR). R package. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PMCMR.

  36. Prach, K. and P. Pyšek. 2001. Using spontaneous succession for restoration of human-disturbed habitats: Experience from Central Europe. Ecol. Eng. 17: 55–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. R Core Team. 2013. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.

  38. Rosenthal, G. 2010. Secondary succession in a fallow central European wet grassland. Flora 205: 153–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ruprecht, E. 2005. Secondary succession in old-fields in the Transylvanian Lowlands (Romania). Preslia 77: 145–157.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ruprecht, E. 2006. Successfully recovered grassland: a promising example from Romanian old-fields. Restor. Ecol. 14: 473–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ruprecht, E., K. Lukács, P. Domokos, A. Fenesi. 2015. Hydration status influences seed fire tolerance in temperate European herbaceous species. Plant Biol. doi:10.1111/plb. 12394.

  42. Sanda, V., A. Popescu, M.I. Doltu and N. Doniţă. 1983. Caracterizarea ecologică şi fitocenologică a speciilor spontane din flora României. Studii şi Comunicări 25: 5–126.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Santos, S.A., J.E. Cabanas and J.A. Pereira. 2007. Abundance and diversity of soil arthropods in olive grove ecosystem (Portugal): Effect of pitfall trap type. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 43: 77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Seifert, B. 2007. Die Ameisen Mittel- und Nordeuropas. Lutra Verlags- und Vertriebsgesellschaft, Tauer.

  45. Sutcliffe, L.M.E., P. Batáry, T. Becker, K.M. Orci and C. Leuschner 2014. Both local and landscape factors determine plant and Orthoptera diversity in the semi-natural grasslands of Transylvania, Romania. Biodivers. Cons. 24: 229–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Stampfli, A., and M. Zeiter. 1999. Plant species decline due to abandonment of meadows cannot easily be reversed by mowing. A case study from the southern Alps. J. Veg. Sci. 10: 151–164.

  47. Tryjanowski, P., T. Hartel, A. Báldi, P. Szymański, M. Tobolka, I. Herzon, A. Goławski, M. Konvička, M. Hromada, L. Jerzak K. Kujawa, M. Lenda, G. Orłowski, M. Panek, P. Skórka, T.H. Sparks, S. Tworek, A Wuczyński and M. Żmihorski. 2011. Conservation of farmland birds faces different challenges in Western and Central-Eastern Europe. Acta Ornithol. 46: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tutin, T.G., V.H. Heywood, N.A. Burges, D.M. Moore, D.H. Valentine, S.M. Walters and D.A. Webb. 1964-1980. Flora Europaea, vols. 1–5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Underwood, E.C and B.L. Fisher. 2006. The role of ants in conservation monitoring: If, when, and how. Biol. Conserv. 132: 166–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wiezik, M., A. Wieziková and M. Svitok. 2010. Effects of secondary succession in abandoned grassland on the activity of ground-foraging ant assemblages (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Acta Soc. Zol. Bohem. 74: 153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wilson, J.B., R.K. Peet, J. Dengler and M. Pärtel. 2012. Plant species richness: the world records. J. Veg. Sci. 23: 796–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Német.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Német, E., Ruprecht, E., Gallé, R. et al. Abandonment of crop lands leads to different recovery patterns for ant and plant communities in Eastern Europe. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 17, 79–87 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2016.17.1.10

Download citation

Keywords

  • Conservation policies
  • Disturbance
  • Diversity
  • Insects
  • Land use strategies
  • Restoration
  • Succession
  • Traditional management
  • Vegetation structure

Nomenclature

  • Seifert (2007) for ants
  • Tutin et al. (1964–1980) for vascular plants