The contribution of local (e.g., competition) and regional (e.g., dispersal) processes in the structure of communities remains an unresolved issue. In general, a tendency to assume local processes to be deterministic and regional to be stochastic dominates, although it is challenged. Fortunately, it can be cast as a testable proposition: if correct, the degree of determinism in the final community structure might indicate which process is more prominent in the control of community structure. However, recent findings have also suggested that stochastic patterns can arise from local processes and that dispersal can homogenize communities, which would make them appear deterministic irrespective of the mechanism involved. To evaluate these competing expectations we conducted an experiment where the initial communities had the same composition and species abundances. We hypothesized that if local processes dominate, then arrays of communities will show divergence of community structures whether connected by dispersal or not (i.e., being fully isolated). Alternatively, if regional processes dominate, the dispersal connected communities should converge while isolated ones should not. We found, however, that both groups of experimental communities showed similar patterns of change - a decline in similarity and a tendency to diverge. This suggests that biological interactions, demographic stochasticity, or both, exert noticeable control over community structure such that they reduce similarity among replicate communities and diversify their final states. We speculate that these mechanisms enhance potential for species additions, particularly in conjunction with factors such as dispersal and the size of the regional species pool.
Altermatt, F., S. Schreiber and M. Holyoak. 2011. Interactive effects of disturbance and dispersal directionality on species richness and composition in meta-communities. Ecology 92:859–70.
Beisner, B. and T. Romanuk. 2005. Diversity, productivity and invasibility relationships in rock pool food webs. In: P. De Ruiter, W. Wolters and J. Moore (eds.), Dynamic Food Webs: Multispecies Assemblages, Ecosystem Development, and Environmental Change. Elsevier, Amsterdam. pp. 321–333.
Belyea, L.R. and J. Lancaster. 1999. Assembly rules within a contingent ecology. Oikos 86:402.
Borrvall, C. and B. Ebenman. 2006. Early onset of secondary extinctions in ecological communities following the loss of top predators. Ecol. Lett. 9:435–42.
Brown, J.H., D.A. Kelt and B.J. Fox. 2002. Assembly rules and competition in desert rodents. Amer. Nat. 160:815–8.
Cadotte, M.W. 2006. Dispersal and species diversity: a meta-analysis. Amer. Nat. 168:913–924.
Chase, J.M. 2003. Community assembly: when should history matter? Oecologia 136:489–98.
Chase, J.M. 2005. Towards a really unified theory for metacommunities. Funct. Ecol. 19:182–186.
Cottenie, K. and L. De Meester. 2003. Connectivity and cladoceran species richness in a metacommunity of shallow lakes. Freshwater Biol. 48:823–832.
Cottenie, K. and L. De Meester. 2004. Metacommunity structure: synergy of biotic interactions as selective agents and dispersal as fuel. Ecology 85:114–119.
Cottenie, K., E. Michels and N. Nuytten. 2003. Zooplankton meta-community structure: regional vs. local processes in highly interconnected ponds. Ecology 84:991–1000.
Drake, J. 1990. Communities as assembled structures: do rules govern pattern? Trends Ecol. Evol. 5:159–164.
Drake, J.A., T. Flum, and G.R. Huxel. 1994. On defining assembly space: a reply to Grover and Lawton. J. Animal Ecol. 63:488–489.
Fox, B.J. 1987. Species assembly and the evolution of community structure. Evol. Ecol. 1:201–213.
Gilpin, M.E. and J.M. Diamond. 1982. Factors contributing to non-randomness in species co-occurrences on islands. Oecologia 52:75–84.
Havel, J.E., and J.B. Shurin. 2004. Mechanisms, effects, and scales of dispersal in freshwater zooplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr. 49:1229–1238.
Houlahan, J., D. Currie, K. Cottenie, G. Cumming, S.K.M. Ernest, C. Findlay, S. Fuhlendorf, U. Gaedke, P. Legendre, J. Magnuson, et al.. 2007. Compensatory dynamics are rare in natural ecological communities. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 104:3273.
Hu, X.-S., F. He and S.P Hubbell. 2007. Species diversity in local neutral communities. Amer. Nat. 170:844–53.
Hubbell, S.P. 2005. Neutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesis of functional equivalence. Funct. Ecol. 19:166–172.
Hubbell, S.P. 2006. Neutral theory and the evolution of ecological equivalence. Ecology 87:1387–98.
Law, R. and R.D. Morton. 1993. Alternative permanent states of ecological communities. Ecology 74:1347–1361.
Marquez, J. C. 2011. Assembly rules determinism vs. randomness in the formation of communities. McMaster University, Canada.
Marquez, J.C. and J. Kolasa. 2013. Local and regional processes in community assembly. PloS one 8:e54580.
Michels, E., K. Cottenie, L. Neys and L. De Meester. 2001. Zooplankton on the move: first results on the quantification of dispersal of zooplankton in a set of interconnected ponds. Hydrobiologia 442:117–126.
Morton, R.D., R. Law, S.L. Pimm and J.A. Drake. 1996. On models for assembling ecological communities. Oikos 75:493–499.
Mouquet, N. and M. Loreau. 2002. Coexistence in metacommunities: the regional similarity hypothesis. Amer. Nat. 159:420–426.
Mouquet, N, P. Munguia, J. Kneitel and T.E. Miller. 2003. Community assembly time and the relationship between local and regional species richness. Oikos 103:618–626.
Mutshinda, CM., R.B. O’Hara, and I.P Woiwod. 2009. What drives community dynamics? Proc. Royal Soc. B. 276:2923–9.
Powell, C.R. and R.P Boland. 2009. The effects of stochastic population dynamics on food web structure. J. Theoret. Biol. 257:170–180.
Ricciardi, A. 2001. Facilitative interactions among aquatic invaders: is an “invasional meltdown” occurring in the Great Lakes? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58:2513–2525.
Ricklefs, R.E. 2008. Disintegration of the ecological community. Amer. Nat. 172:741–750.
Romanuk, T.N. and J. Kolasa. 2005. Resource limitation, biodiversity, and competitive effects interact to determine the invasibility of rock pool microcosms. Biol. Invasions 7:711–722.
Schröder, A., L. Persson, and A.M. De Roos. 2005. Direct experimental evidence for alternative stable states: a review. Oikos 110:3–19.
Scotti, M., F.Ciocchetta and F. Jordan. 2013. Social and landscape effects on food webs: a multi-level network simulation model. J. Complex Networks 1:160–182.
Shurin, J.B. 2000. Dispersal limitation, invasion resistance, and the structure of pond zooplankton communities. Ecology 81:3074–3086.
Shurin, J.B., P. Amarasekare, J.M. Chase, R.D. Holt, M. Hoopes and M.A. Leibold. 2004. Alternative stable states and regional community structure. J. Theoret. Biol. 227:359–368.
Shurin, J.B., J.E. Havel, M.A. Leibold and B. Pinel-Alloul. 2000. Local and regional zooplankton species richness: a scale-independent test for saturation. Ecology 81:3062–3073.
Therriault, T. and J. Kolasa. 2000. Patterns of community variability depend on habitat variability and habitat generalists in natural aquatic microcosms. Community Ecol. 1:196–203.
Therriault, T. and J. Kolasa. 2001. Desiccation frequency reduces species diversity and predictability of community structure in coastal rock pools. Israel J. Zool. 47:477–489.
Verdy, A. and P. Amarasekare. 2010. Alternative stable states in communities with intraguild predation. J. Theoret. Biol. 262:116–128.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Márquez, J., Kolasa, J. & Sciullo, L. Local versus regional processes and the control of community structure. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 17, 1–7 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2016.17.1.1
- Local processes
- Regional processes