Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 314–323 | Cite as

Structure of Polish Isolates of Bipolaris sorokiniana and Effect of Different Pathotypes on Spot Blotch Severity of Selected Spring Barley Cultivars

  • M. CegiełkoEmail author
  • M. Wit
  • I. Kiecana
  • W. Wakuliński
  • E. Mielniczuk


Spot blotch of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), caused by Bipolaris sorokiniana, is worldwide and economically one of the most important diseases. The structure of the B. sorokiniana population is not uniform. Within isolates of this species, there are strains that differ in virulence and aggressiveness. The aim of the study was to determine the variability of virulence within Polish isolates of B. sorokiniana and to test selected strains of this fungus terms of their pathogenicity in relation to different spring barley cultivars. The diversity of 70 Polish isolates of B. sorokiniana was determined based on the reaction of three spring barley test lines — Bowman, ND5883 and NDB12 with a certain susceptibility to infection by this pathogen and compared to three isolates of B. sorokiniana: ND93-1 classified to pathotype 0, ND85F — pathotype 1 and ND90Pr — pathotype 2. In the population of 70 isolates of B. sorokiniana, two pathotypes — 0 (14 isolates) and 1 (56 isolates) were identified. The mean values of leaf infection index evaluated for lines — Bowman, ND5883 and NDB12 in the case of B. sorokiniana isolates of pathotype 0 ranged: 17.08, 25.42 and 18.13, respectively, and in the case of B. sorokiniana isolates of pathotype 1: 15.57, 59.81 and 17.98, respectively. In the second experiment, the susceptibility of 8 spring barley cultivars to leaf infection by 10 selected isolates of B. sorokiniana (5 of pathotype 0 and 5 of pathotype 1) was tested. The mean value of leaf infection index calculated for analyzed cultivars in experimental combination with pathotype 0 isolates of B. sorokiniana was 1.56, and in the case of isolates of pathotype 1 was 16.58.


Bipolaris sorokiniana pathogenicity infection pathotypes disease index 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahmed, F., Hossain, I., Aminuzzaman, F.M. 2003. Effect of different pathotypes of Bipolaris sorokiniana on spot blotch severity and yield contributing characters of wheat cv. Kanchan inoculated at maximum tillering stage. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 6(7):693–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almgren, I., Gustaffson, M., Fält, A.S., Lindgren, H., Lilieroth, E. 1999. Interaction between root and leaf disease development in barley cultivars after inoculation with different isolates of Bipolaris sorokiniana. J. Phytopathol. 147:331–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apoga, D., Åkesson, H., Jansson, H.B., Odham, G. 2002. Relationship between production of the phytotoxin prehelminthosporol and virulence in isolates of the plant pathogenic fungus Bipolaris sorokiniana. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 108:519–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arabi, M.I., Jahwar, M. 2004. Repeatibility of barley seedling reaction to spot blotch and common root rot. Cer. Res. Comm. 32(2):249–253.Google Scholar
  5. Cegiełko, M. 2006. Investigations on Bipolaris sorokiniana (Sacc.) Shoem. and Drechslera avenae (Eidam) Scharif strains and susceptibility of oat (Avena sativa L.) lines to these pathogenic agents. Doctor dissertation.Google Scholar
  6. Fetch, T.G., Steffenson, B.J. 1999. Rating scales for assessing infection responses of barley infected with Cochliobolus sativus. Plant Dis. 83(3):213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ghazvini, H., Tekauz, A. 2007. Virulence diversity in the population of Bipolaris sorokiniana. Plant Dis. 91(7):814–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghazvini, H., Tekauz, A. 2008. Host × pathogen interactions among barley genotypes and Bipolaris sorokiniana isolates. Plant Dis. 92:225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gyawali, S. 2010. Association mapping of resistance to common root rot and spot blotch in barley, and population genetics of Cochliobolus sativus. Fargo, ND, USA, North Dakota State University, PhD thesis.Google Scholar
  10. Gyawali, S., Neate, S.M., Adhikari, T.B., Puri, K.D., Burlakoti, R.R., Zhong, S. 2012. Genetic structure of Cochliobolus sativus populations sampled from roots and leaves of barley and wheat in North Dakota. J. Phytopathol. 160:637–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jahani, M., Aggarwal, R., Gupta, S., Sharma, S., Dureja, P. 2014. Purification and characterization of a novel toxin from Bipolaris sorokiniana, causing spot blotch of wheat and analysis of variability in the pathogen. Cer. Res. Comm. 42(2):252–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kiecana, I., Cegiełko, M. 2007. Pathogenicity of Bipolaris sorokiniana (Sacc.) Shoem. to selected oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes. Plant Breed. Seed Sci. 56:31–45.Google Scholar
  13. Kiecana, I., Cegiełko, M., Mielniczuk, E. 2012. Fungi colonizing the sowing material of turfgrasses considering susceptibility of cultivars to selected pathogens. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 11(5):153–168.Google Scholar
  14. Knight, N.L., Platz, G.J., Lehmensiek, A., Sutherland, M.W. 2010. An investigation of genetic variation among Australian isolates of Bipolaris sorokiniana from different cereal tissues and comparison of their abilities to cause spot blotch on barley. Aust. Plant Pathol. 39(3):207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kumar, J., Schäfer, P., Hückelhoven, R., Langen, G., Baltruschat, H., Stein, E., Nagarajan, S., Kogel, K.H. 2002. Bipolaris sorokiniana, a cereal pathogen of global concern: cytological and molecular approaches towards better control. Mol. Plant Pathol. 3(4):185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mann, M.B., Minotto, E., Feltrin, T., Milagre, L.P., Spadari, C., Van Der Sand, S.T. 2014. Genetic diversity among monoconidial and polyconidial isolates of Bipolaris sorokiniana. Curr. Microbiol. 69:874–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mańka, M. 1989. Pathogenicity of selected Fusarium species for cereal seedlings. Roczniki AR Poznań, Scientific Dissertations 201:1–64.Google Scholar
  18. Pandley, S.P., Sharma, S., Chand, R., Shahi, P., Joshi, A.K. 2008. Clonal variability and its relevance in generation of new pathotypes in the spot blotch pathogen, Bipolaris sorokiniana. Curr. Microbiol. 56:33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Poloni, A., Pessi, I.S., Frazzon, A.P.G., Van Der Sand, S.T. 2009. Morphology, physiology, and virulence of Bipolaris sorokiniana isolates. Current Microbiology. 59:267–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Steffenson, B.J., Hayes, P.M., Kleinhofs, A. 1996. Genetics of seedling and adult plant resistance to net blotch (Pyrenophora teres f. teres) and spot blotch (Cochliobolus sativus) in barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92:552–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Valjavec-Gratian, M., Steffenson, B.J. 1997. Pathotypes of Cochliobolus sativus on barley in North Dakota. Plant Dis. 81:1275–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhong, S., Steffenson, B.J. 2001. Virulence and molecular diversity in Cochliobolus sativus. Phytopathology 91(5):469–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Cegiełko
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Wit
    • 2
  • I. Kiecana
    • 1
  • W. Wakuliński
    • 2
  • E. Mielniczuk
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant ProtectionLublin University of Life SciencesLublinPoland
  2. 2.Department of Plant PathologyWarsaw University of Life SciencesWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations