Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction and Yield Stability Index for Genotype by Environment Analysis and Wider Adaptability in Barley

Abstract

Genotype by environment interaction distorts genetic analysis, changes relative ranking of genotypes and a major obstruction for varietal release. AMMI model is a quick and relevant tool to judge environmental behaviour and genotypic stability in comparison to ANOVA, multiplicative model and linear regressions. We evaluated 19 barley genotypes grown at 08 diverse locations to identify discriminating environments and ideal genotypes with dynamic stability. In AMMI ANOVA, the locations and genotype by environment interaction exhibited 66% and 14.7% of the total variation. The initial first two principal components showed significant interaction with 36.0 and 28.4% variation, respectively. AMMI1 biplot showed that the environments Bawal, Ludhiana and Durgapura were high yielding with high IPCA1 scores and located far away from the biplot origin. However, in AMMI1and AMMI2 biplots the locations Hisar, Ludhiana, Karnal, Bathinda and Modipuram were found suitable with low IPCA2 scores. Yield stability index (YSI) was highly useful with ASV ranks and the genotypes DWRB150 and BH1013 and checks BH902, DWRUB52 and DWRB101 were selected for high grain yield and wider adaptability across the locations.

References

  1. Alwala, S., Kwolek, T., McPherson, M., Pellow, J., Meyer, D. 2010. A comprehensive comparison between Eberhart and Russell joint regression and GGE biplot analyses to identify stable and high yielding maize hybrids. Field Crop Res. 119:225–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Asfaw, A., Alemayehu, F., Gurum, F., Atnaf, M. 2009. AMMI and SREG GGE biplot analysis for matching varieties onto soybean production environments in Ethiopia. Scientific Res. and Essay 4:1322–1330.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baik, B.K., Ullrich, S.E. 2008. Barley for food: characteristics, improvement, and renewed interest. J. of Cereal Sci. 48:233–242.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Becker, H.C., Leon J. 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding 101:1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Crossa, J. 2012. From genotype x environment interaction to gene x environment interaction. Current Genomics 13:225–244.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eberhart, S.A., Russell, W.A. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6:36–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. FAOSTAT. 2017: FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. Available at https://doi.org/faostat3.fao.org (accessed April, 2017).

  8. Finlay, K.W., Wilkinson, G.N. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Crop and Pasture Sci. 14:742–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Flores, F., Moreno, M.T., Cubero, J.I. 1998. A comparison of univariate and multivariate methods to analyze G×E interaction. Field Crops Research 56:271–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gabriel, K.R. 1971. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika 58:453–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gauch, H.G. 1988. Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics 88:705–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gauch, H.G. 2006. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Sci. 46:1488–1500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gauch, H.G., Piepho, H.P., Annicchiarico, P. 2008. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE: Further considerations. Crop Sci. 48:866–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuchanur, P. H., Salimath, P.M., Wali, M.C., Hiremath, C. 2015. GGE biplot analysis for grain yield of single cross maize hybrids under stress and non-stress conditions. Indian J. Genet. 75:514–517.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar V., Kharub, A.S., Verma, R.P.S., Verma, A. 2016a. Applicability of joint regression and biplot models for stability analysis in multi-environment barley (Hordeum vulgare) trials. Indian Journal of Agril. Sci. 86:1443–1448.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar, V., Khippal, A., Singh, J., Selvakumar, R., Malik, R., Kumar, D., Kharub, A.S., Verma, R.P.S., Sharma, I. 2014. Barley research in India: retrospect and prospects. Journal of Wheat Res. 6:1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar, V., A. S. Kharub, R. P. S. Verma, A. Verma, 2016b: AMMI, GGE biplots and regression analysis to comprehend the G × E interaction in multi-environment barley trials. Indian Journal of Genet. 76:202–204.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar, V., Kumar, R., Verma., R.P.S., Verma, A., Sharma, I. 2013. Recent trends in breeder seed production of barley (H. vulgare L.) in India. Indian Journal of Agril. Sci. 83:576–578.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mohammadi, R., Amri, A. 2013. Genotype x environment interaction and genetic improvement for yield and yield stability of rainfed durum wheat in Iran. Euphytica 192:227–249.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mortazavian, S.M., Nikkhah, H.R., Hassani, F.A., Sharif-al-Hosseini, M., Taheri, M., Mahlooji, M. 2014. GGE biplot and AMMI analysis of yield performance of barley genotypes across different environments in Iran. J. of Agril. Sci. and Tech. 16:609–622.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nurminiemi, M., Madsen, S., Rognli, O.A., Bjornstad, A., Ortiz, R. 2002. Analysis of the genotype-by-environment interaction of spring barley tested in the Nordic Region of Europe: Relationships among stability statistics for grain yield. Euphytica 127:123–132.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Oliveira, E.J., Freitas, J.P., Jesus, O.N. 2014. AMMI analysis of the adaptability and yield stability of yellow passion fruit varieties. Scientia Agricola. 71:139–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Purchase, J.L., Hatting, H., Vandeventer, C.S. 2000. Genotype × environment interaction of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in South Africa. II. Stability analysis of yield performance. South African J. of Plant and Soil 17:101–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rad, M.R.N., Kadir, M.A., Rafi, M.Y., Jaafar, H.Z., Naghavi, M.R., Ahmadi, F. 2013. Genotype× environment interaction by AMMI and GGE biplot analysis in three consecutive generations of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under normal and drought stress conditions. Aus. J. of Crop Sci. 7:956–961.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Raggi, L., Ciancaleoni, S., Torricelli, R., Terzi, V., Ceccarelli, S., Negri, V. 2017. Evolutionary breeding for sustainable agriculture: Selection and multi-environmental evaluation of barley populations and lines. Field Crops Res. 204:76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rakshit, S., Ganapathy, K., Gomashe, S., Dhandapani, A., Swapna, M., Mehtre, S., Gadakh, S., Ghorade, R., Kamatar, M., Jadhav, B., Das, I. 2017. Analysis of Indian post-rainy sorghum multi-location trial data reveals complexity of genotype× environment interaction. The J. of Agril. Sci. 155:44–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rakshit, S., Ganapathy, K.N., Gomashe, S.S., Rathore, A., Ghorade, R.B., Kumar, M.V.N., Ganesmurthy, K., Jain, S.K., Kamtar, M.Y., Sachan, J.S., Ambekar, S.S., Ranwa, B.R., Kanawade, D.G., Balusamy, M., Kadam, D., Sarkar, A., Tonapi, V.A., Patil, J. V. 2012. GGE biplot analysis to evaluate genotype, environment and their interactions in sorghum multi-location data. Euphytica 185:465–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sousa, L.B., Hamawaki, O.T., Nogueira, A.P., Batista, R.O., Oliveira, V.M., Hamawaki, R.L. 2015. Evaluation of soybean lines and environmental stratification using the AMMI, GGE biplot, and factor analysis methods. Genetics and Mol. Res. 14:12660–12674.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yan, W., Kang, M.S., Ma, B., Woods, S., Cornelius, P.L. 2007. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci. 47:643–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Kumar.

Additional information

Communicated by V. Korzun

Rights and permissions

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, V., Kharub, A.S. & Singh, G.P. Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction and Yield Stability Index for Genotype by Environment Analysis and Wider Adaptability in Barley. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 46, 365–375 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1556/0806.46.2018.17

Download citation

Keywords

  • AMMI
  • ASV
  • YSI
  • G×E
  • barley