Heritability and Expression of Selected Mixograph Parameters in Progeny of Parents Varying for Mixing Time
The mixograph performs certain rheological measurements during dough mixing and is a good predictor of wheat end-use quality. The aim of this study was to determine the expression and the heritability of mixing characteristics measured with Mixsmart® software and some quality characteristics in hard red spring wheat parents and their F1 progeny. Six parents varying in midline peak time and envelope peak time were crossed in a half diallel design. Parents and progeny were planted in three different environments. General combining ability (GCA) was a significant source of variation for the measured characteristics, and parents differed widely in terms of GCA effects. Midline-development time, -peak integral and -peak time showed high narrow sense heritability. Envelope peak-integral and -tail width displayed high narrow sense heritability for some, but not all locations. High GCA:SCA (specific combining ability) ratios indicated the prevalence of additive gene effects for midline-development time, -peak integral and -peak time, indicating that these characteristics are largely genetically determined, and that selection for them should lead to genetic gain.
Keywordsdiallel inheritance Mixsmart wheat quality
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This work was funded in part by the National Research Foundation of South Africa (UID72056).
- Agronomix Software, Inc. 2014. AGROBASE Generation II User’s Manual. Version II, Revised Edition. www.agronomix.com. Agronomix Software. Winnipeg, MB, Canada.Google Scholar
- Ahmed, Z., Singh, K.N., Srivastava, V.K. 1991. Grain quality characters in wheat. Indian J. of Genet. 51:84–89.Google Scholar
- American Association of Cereal Chemists (AACC) 2000. Approved methods of the AACC, 10th edition. American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc. St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.Google Scholar
- Dabholkar, A.R. 1999. Elements of Biometrical Genetics. Concept Publishing Company. New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
- Finney, K.F., Yamazaki, W.T., Youngs, V.L., Rubenthaler, G.L. 1987. Quality of hard, soft and durum wheats. In: Heyne, E.G. (ed.), Wheat and Wheat Improvement, 2nd ed. Am. Soc. of Agron., Inc., Crop Sci. Soc. of Am., Inc, Soil Sci. Soc. of Am., Inc. USA. pp. 677–748.Google Scholar
- Gras, P.W., O’Brien, L. 1992. Application of a 2-gram mixograph to early generation selection for dough strength. Cereal Chem. 69:254–257.Google Scholar
- Mao, X., Li, Y., Zhao, S., Zhang, J., Lei, Q., Meng, D., Ma, F., Hu, W., Chen, M., Chang, J., Wang, Y., Yang, G., He, G. 2013. The interactive effects of transgenetically overexpressed 1Ax1 with various HMW-GS combinations on dough quality by introgression of exogenous subunits into an elite Chinese wheat variety. PLoS ONE 8:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Morojele, M.E., Labuschagne, M.T. 2013. Estimates of genetic parameters for quality of wheat cultivars grown in Lesotho. African Crop Sci. J. 21:191–199.Google Scholar
- SAGL (South African Grain Laboratory) 2013. Analysis procedure and evaluation norms for the classification of wheat breeders’ lines for the RSA, as revised by: Sensako, Pannar, ARC-SGI, SA Chamber of Baking, National Chamber of Milling, Grain SA and SAGL.Google Scholar
- Walker, A.E., Walker, C.E. 1992. Documentation and user’s instructions for Mixsmart. National Manufacturing Division, TMCO. 507 J. Street, Lincoln, NE68508, USA.Google Scholar
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.