Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 43, Issue 4, pp 579–590 | Cite as

Application of Impedance Spectroscopy and Conductometry for Assessment of Varietal Differences in Wheat

  • K. V. KochevaEmail author
  • G. I. Georgiev
  • V. K. Kochev
  • K. Olšovská
  • M. Brestič
Physiology

Abstract

The potentials of an electrochemical and a physical technique for detection of physiological differences in three wheat cultivars under optimal growth conditions were outlined in the study. Electrolyte leakage kinetics was established by continuous measurements of conductivity of solutions in which leaf pieces were incubated for 24 hours. Impedance spectra were obtained from intact leaves at frequency range from 7 to 2010 Hz and 250 mV measuring voltage applied between two gold plated silicon substrates serving as electrodes. The obtained spectra were approximated by a model employing two ARC elements connected in series. Parameters of the previously described diffusion model based on time course conductivity measurements were inversely correlated with electrical impedance spectroscopy data, thus the genotype with highest ion leakage (cultivar Prelom) exhibited lowest impedance magnitude. It was concluded that the two methods were able not merely to distinguish the three studied cultivars but also to rank them in the same order based on their electrical properties.

Keywords

diffusion model electrolyte leakage kinetics impedance Triticum aestivum 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was partially supported by a bilateral project between Bulgaria and Slovakia under Contract SLK-01-13-2011 at the Bulgarian NSF.

References

  1. Ackmann, J.J., Seitz, M.A. 1984. Methods of complex impedance measurement in biological tissue. CRC Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 11:281–311.Google Scholar
  2. Bajji, M., Kinet, J.M., Lutts S. 2002. The use of the electrolyte leakage method for assessing cell membrane stability as a water stress tolerance test in durum wheat. Plant Growth Regul. 36:61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bard, A.J., Faulkner, L.R. 1980. Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications. 1st ed. John Wiley & Sons. New York, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Barsoukov, E., Macdonald, J.R. (eds) 2005. Impedance Spectroscopy. Theory, Experiment, and Applications. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blinks, L.R., Skow, R.K. 1938. The time course of photosynthesis as shown by a rapid electrode method for oxygen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 24:420–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, Jr. L.C. 1956. Monitor and control of blood and tissue oxygen tension. Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs 2:41–48.Google Scholar
  7. Cole, K.S., Cole, R.H. 1941. Dispersion and absorption in dielectrics. I. Alternating current characteristics. J. Chem. Phys. 9:341–351.Google Scholar
  8. Cole, K.S. 1968. Membranes, Ions and Impulses, University of California Press. Berkley, Los Angeles, USA.Google Scholar
  9. de Faria AP, Lemos-Filho J, Modolo LV, França MGC. 2013. Electrolyte leakage and chlorophyll a fluorescence among castor bean cultivars under induced water deficit. Acta Physiol. Plant. 35:119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delieu, T.J., Walker, D.A. 1981. Measurement of O2 evolution by leaf discs. New Phytol. 9:165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evett, S. 2008. Gravimetric and volumetric direct measurements of soil water content. In: Field estimation of soil water content. A practical guide to methods, instrumentation and sensor technologies. IAEA-TCS 30. Vienna, Austria. pp. 23–38.Google Scholar
  12. Farooq, S., Azam, F. 2006. The use of cell membrane stability (CMS) technique to screen for salt tolerant wheat varieties. J. Plant Physiol. 163:629–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jócsák, I., Droppa, M., Horváth, G., Bóka, K., Vozáry, E. 2009. Cadmium- and flooding-induced anoxia stress in pea roots measured by electrical impedance. Z. Naturforsch. 65c:95–102.Google Scholar
  14. Kell, D.B. 1987. The principles and potential of electrical admittance spectroscopy, In: Turner, A.P.F., Karube, I., Wilson, G.S. (eds), Biosensors: fundamentals and applications. Oxford University Press. New York, USA. pp. 427–469.Google Scholar
  15. Klaper, M., Mathis, H. 2008. 2-Pound RLC Meter – impedance measurement using a sound card. Elektor. 6:64–68.Google Scholar
  16. Kocheva, K.V., Georgiev, G.I., Kochev, V.K. 2005. A diffusion approach to the electrolyte leakage from plant tissues. Physiol. Plant. 125:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kocheva, K.V., Georgiev, G.I., Kochev, V.K. 2014. An improvement of the diffusion model for assessment of drought stress response in plants. Physiol. Plant. 150:88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mancuso, S., Nicese, F.P., Masi, E., Azzarello, E. 2004. Comparing fractal analysis, electrical impedance and electrolyte leakage for the assessment of cold tolerance in Callistemon and Grevillea spp. J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 79:627–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mizukami, Y., Sawai, Y., Yamaguchi, Y. 2006. Moisture content measurement of tea leaves by electrical impedance and capacitance. Biosyst. Engin. 93:293–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mizukami, Y., Yamada, K., Sawai, Y., Yamaguchi, Y. 2007. Measurement of fresh tea leaf growth using electrical impedance spectroscopy. Agricultural J. 2:134–139.Google Scholar
  21. Murray, M.B., Cape, J.N., Flower, D. 1989. Quantification of frost damage in plant tissues by rates of electrolyte leakage. New Phytol. 113:307–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Palto, S.P. 1998. D. Sci. Thesis, Inst. Crystallogr. Ros. Acad. Nauk. Moscow, Russia.Google Scholar
  23. Prášil, I., Zámečník, J. 1998. The use of a conductivity measurement method for assessing freezing injury. I. Influence of leakage time, segment number, size and shape in a sample on evaluation of the degree of injury. Environ. Exp. Bot. 40:1–10.Google Scholar
  24. Radoglou, K., Cabral, R., Repo, T., Hasanagas, N., Sutinen, M.-L., Waisel, Y. 2007. Appraisal of root leakage as a method for estimation of root viability. Plant Biosyst. 141:443–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Repo, T., Zhang, M.I.N. 1993. Modeling woody plant tissues using a distributed electrical circuit. J. Exp. Bot. 44:977–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Repo, T., Pulli, S. 1996. Application of impedance spectroscopy for selecting frost hardy varieties of english ryegrass. Ann. Bot. 78:605–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Repo, T., Zhang, G., Ryypö, A., Rikala, R. 2000. The electrical impedance spectroscopy of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) shoots in relation to cold acclimation. J. Exp. Bot. 51:2095–2107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Roy, R., Agarwal, V., Gupta, S.C. 2009. Comparison of drought-induced polypeptides and ion leakage in three tomato cultivars. Biol. Plant. 53:685–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Saneoka, H., Moghaieb, R.E.A., Premachandra, G.S., Fujita, K. 2004. Nitrogen nutrition and water stress effects on cell membrane stability and leaf water relations in Agrostis palustris Huds. Environ. Exp. Bot. 52:131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Simeonov, F., Kocheva, K., Georgiev, G.I., Kochev, V.K. 2013. A simple impedimetric device for in situ analysis of plant tissues. Compt. Rend. Acad. Bulg. Sci. 66:969–974.Google Scholar
  31. StatSoft. 2005. STATISTICA v. 7. StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA. Available at www.statsoft.com/textbook.Google Scholar
  32. Whitlow, T.H., Bassuk, N.L., Ranney, T.G., Reichert, D.L. 1992. An improved method for using electrolyte leakage to assess membrane competence in plant tissues. Plant Physiol 98:198–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wilner J, Brach E.J. 1979. Utilization of bioelectric tests in biological research. Engineering and Statistical Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
  34. Zhang, G., Ryyppö, A., Repo, T. 2002. The electrical impedance spectroscopy of Scots pine needles during cold acclimation. Physiol. Plant. 115:385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang, M.I.N., Willison, J.H.M. 1991. Electrical impedance analysis in plant tissues: a double shell model. J. Exp. Bot. 42:1465–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang, M.I.N., Willison, J.H.M. 1992. Electrical impedance analysis in plant tissues: The effect of freeze-thaw injury on the electrical properties of potato tuber and carrot root tissue. Can. J. Plant Sci. 72:545–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. V. Kocheva
    • 1
    Email author
  • G. I. Georgiev
    • 1
  • V. K. Kochev
    • 2
  • K. Olšovská
    • 3
  • M. Brestič
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Plant Physiology and GeneticsBulgarian Academy of SciencesSofiaBulgaria
  2. 2.Faculty of PhysicsSofia University ‘St. Kl. Ochridski’SofiaBulgaria
  3. 3.Department of Plant PhysiologySlovak Agricultural UniversityNitraSlovakia

Personalised recommendations