Advertisement

Acta Biologica Hungarica

, Volume 68, Issue 4, pp 358–367 | Cite as

Electro-Antennographic Response of Helopeltis theivora to Synthetic Pesticides Used in Tea Plantations

  • Kokkadan K. SrikumarEmail author
  • Sukumaran Smitha
  • Bastian S. Kumar
  • Balakrishnan Radhakrishnan
Article

Abstract

Helopeltis theivora is considered as one of the major pest in tea plantations causing considerable economic damage. Recent control strategies against this notorious polyphagous pest mainly depend on the application of insecticides. The study is focused on the antennal response of H. theivora on exposure to different insecticides using electroantenogram (EAG). The result showed that the insects perceive quinalphos as they are frequently exposed to it. The hierarchy of the EAG response of exposed and unexposed insects was quinalphos > bifenthrin > deltamethrin > thiamethoxam.

Keywords

Electroantenogram Helopeltis theivora insecticide polyphagous 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alcock, J. (1984) Animal Behaviour: an evolutionary approach, 3rd edition, Sinauer Associates Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chong, K. K. (1987) The cocoa mirid in Peninsular Malaysia and its management. Planter 63, 16–520.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cork, A. (1994) Identification of electrophysiologically-active compounds for New World screw worm, Cochliomyia hominivorax, in larval wound fluid. Med. Vet. Entomol. 8, 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dickens, J. C., Gutman, A., Payne, T., Ryker, L. C., Rudinsky, J. A. (1983) Antennal olfactory responsiveness of Douglas fir beetle, Dendroctonus psuedosugae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to pheromones and host odors. J. Chem. Ecol. 9, 1383–1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gurusubramanian, G., Bora, S. (2007) Relative toxicity of some commonly used insecticides against adults of Helopeltis theivora Waterhouse (Miridae: Hemiptera) collected from Jorhat area tea plantations, South Assam, India. Resistant Pest Manag. Newsl. 17, 8–12.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Han, B. Y., Chen, Z. M., Fang, Y. L. (2001) Electrophysiology and behavior feedback of diamond back moth, Plutella xylostella, to volatile secondary metabolites emitted by Chinese cabbage. Chinese Sci. Bull. 46, 2086–2088.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Han, B. Y., Chen, Z. M. (2002) Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of natural enemies to synomones from tea shoots and kairomones from tea aphids, Toxoptera aurantii. J. Chem. Ecol. 28, 2203–2219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hazarika, L. K., Bhuyan, M., Hazarika, B. N. (2009) Insect pests of tea and their management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 54, 267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Honda, K., Omura, H., Hayashi, N. (1999) Identification of floral volatiles from Ligustrum japonicum that stimulate flower-visiting by cabbage butterfly, Pierisrapae. J. Chem. Ecol. 24, 2167–2180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    IBM Corp. (2013) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. IBM Corp Armonk, NY.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miller S. L., Haber, W. A., Setzer, W. N. (2009) Chemical composition of the leaf essential oil of Casimiroa edulis La Llave&Lex. (Rutaceae) from Monteverde, Costa Rica. Nat Prod Commun. 4, 425–426.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Muraleedharan N. (1987) Entomological research in tea in Southern India. J. Coffee Res. 17, 80–83.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Muraleedharan N. (1992) Bioecology and management of tea pests in southern India. J. Plant. Crops. 20, 1–21.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Park, K. C., Elias, D., Donato, B., Hardie, D. J. (2000) Electroantennogram and behavioural responses of different forms of the bird cherry-oat aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi, to sex pheromone and plant volatiles. J. Insect Physiol. 46, 597–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peal, S. E. (1873) The tea-bug of Assam. J. Agri. Hort. Soc. Indi. 4, 126–132.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Radhakrishnan B. (2014) Recent Advance in tea pest management. Planter Chron 10, 5–13.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Radhakrishnan, B., Srikumar, K. K. (2015) Pheromone trap for the management of tea mosquito bug in tea. Planter Chron. 111, 5–10.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shaw, W. S. (1928) Observations on Helopeltis (Tea Mosquito Blight) for South India Tea Planters. 56 p. The Diocesan Press, Madras.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Srikumar, K. K., Bhat, P. S. (2013) Biology of the tea mosquito bug (Helopeltis theivora Waterhouse) on Chromolaena odorata (L.) R. M. King & H. RobU Chil. J. Agr. Res. 73, 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stonedahl, G. M. (1991) The Oriental species of Helopeltis (Heteroptera: Miridae): a review of economic literature and guide to identification. Bull. Entomol. Res. 81, 465–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Subaharan, K., Kumar, A. V. R., Prabhu, G. (2013) Electrophysiological responses of chafer beetle, Holotrichia serrata (F.) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). J. Saudi Soc. Agri. Sci. 12, 155–159.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sudhakaran R. (2000) Studies on the tea mosquito bug, Helopeltis theivora Waterhouse (Hemiptera: Miridae) infesting tea in south India. PhD dissertation, Bharathiyar University, Coimbatore, India.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sundararaju, D., Sundarababu, P. C. (1999) Helopeltis spp. (Heteroptera: Miridae) and their management in plantation and horticultural crops of India. J. Plant. Crop. 27, 155–174.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Visser, J. H., Straaten, S. V., Maarse, H. (1979) Isolation and identification of volatiles in the foliage of potato, Solanum tuberosum, a host plant of Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata. J. Chem. Ecol. 5, 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wei Ming, F., JianWei, S., Rui, W., Cheng Fa, S. (2000) Electro-antennagraphic response of cotton bollworm to chemical insecticides. Plant Prot. 26, 4–6.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wood-Mason, J. (1884) Report on the tea-mite and tea-bug of Assam. Taylor and Francis, London.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yu, S. J. (1983) Induction of detoxifying enzymes by allelochemicals and host plants in the fall armyworm. Pest. Biochem. Physiol. 19, 330–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yu, S. J. (1986) Host plant induction of microsomal monooxygenases in relation to organophosphate activation in fall armyworm larvae. Fla. Entomol. 69, 579–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zeng, R. S., Zhimou, W., Goudong, N., Schular, M. A., Berenbaum, M. R. (2007) Allelochemical induction of cytochrome P450 mono oxygenases and amelioration of xenobiotic toxicity in Helicoverpazea. J. Chem. Ecol. 33, 449–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2017

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kokkadan K. Srikumar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sukumaran Smitha
    • 1
  • Bastian S. Kumar
    • 1
  • Balakrishnan Radhakrishnan
    • 1
  1. 1.UPASI Tea Research InstituteValparai, Coimbatore642 127India

Personalised recommendations