Skip to main content
Log in

The prophylactic effect of itraconazole capsules and fluconazole capsules for systemic fungal infections in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes: a japanese multicenter randomized, controlled study

  • Published:
International Journal of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We performed a randomized, controlled study comparing the prophylactic effects of capsule forms of fluconazole (n = 110) and itraconazole (n = 108) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) during and after chemotherapy.There were 4 cases with possible systemic fungal infection in the itraconazole group, and there were 8 possible and 3 probable cases in the fluconazole group. Adverse events did not significantly differ in the 2 groups. In patients with MDS or in the remission-induction phase of chemotherapy, the numbers of cases with probable or possible infections were lower in the itraconazole group than in the fluconazole group, whereas no difference was seen in patients with AML or in the consolidation phase of therapy. In patients with neutrophil counts of <0.1 * 109/L lasting for more than 4 weeks, the frequency of infection in the fluconazole group (5 of 9 patients) was significantly higher than in the itraconazole group (0 of 7 patients; P = .03). Our results suggest that both drugs were well tolerated in patients with AML or MDS who received chemotherapy and that the efficacy of itraconazole for prophylaxis against systemic fungal disease is not inferior to that of fluconazole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bow EJ, Laverdière M, Lussier N, Rotstein C, Cheang MS, Ioannou S. Antifungal prophylaxis for severely neutropenic chemotherapy recipients. Cancer. 2002; 94: 3230–3246.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kanda Y, Yamamoto R, Chizuka A, et al. Prophylactic action of oral fluconazole against fungal infection in neutropenic patients. British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Working Party. Cancer. 2000; 89: 1611–1625.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shivji A, Noble MA, Bernstein M. Laboratory monitoring of antifungal chemotherapy. British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Working Party. Lancet. 1991; 337: 1577–1580.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson EM, Szekely A, Warnock DW. In-vitro activity of voriconazole, itraconazole and amphotericin B against filamentous fungi. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1998; 42: 741–745.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Glasmacher A, Prentice A, Gorschlüter M, et al. Itraconazole prevents invasive fungal infections in neutropenic patients treated for hematologic malignancies: evidence from a meta-analysis of 3,597 patients. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21: 4615–4626.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vardakas KZ, Michalopoulos A, Falagas ME. Fluconazole versus itraconazole for antifungal prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies: a meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials. Br J Haematol. 2005; 131: 22–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Boogaerts MA, Verhoef GE, Zachee P, Demuynck H, Verbist L, de Beule K. Antifungal prophylaxis with itraconazole in prolonged neutropenia: correlation with plasma levels. Mycoses. 1989; 32: 103–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Toubai T, Tanaka J, Fujisawa F, Kondo Y, Imamura M. Effect of prophylaxis against mycosis in patients with hematological malignancy disease: efficacy of dosage of itraconazole [in Japanese]. Jpn J Antibiot. 2003; 56: 61–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tamura K, Imajo K, Akiyama N, et al. Randomized trial of cefepime monotherapy or cefepime in combination with amikacin as empirical therapy for febrile neutropenia. Clin Infect Dis. 2004; 39: S15-S24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yoshida M,Akiyama N, Takahashi M, et al. Management of infectious complications in patients with acute leukemia during chemotherapy: a questionnaire analysis by the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group [in Japanese]. Jpn J Chemother. 2003; 51: 703–710.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goodman JL, Winston DJ, Greenfield RA, et al. A controlled trial of fluconazole to prevent fungal infection in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1992; 326: 845–851.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Slavin MA, Osborne B, Adams R, et al. Efficacy and safety of flu-conazole prophylaxis for fungal infections after marrow transplantation: a prospective randomized doubleblind study. J Infect Dis. 1995; 171: 1545–1552.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ascioglu S, Rex JH, de Pauw B, et al. Defining opportunistic invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplants: an international consensus. Clin Infect Dis. 2002; 34: 7–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Deep-seated Mycosis Guidelines Editorial Committee. Guidelines for the Diagnosis and the Treatment of Deep-Seated Mycosis [in Japanese]. Tokyo, Japan: Ishiyaku Publishers; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Klastersky J. Febrile neutropenia. Curr Opin Oncol. 1993; 5: 625–632.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Klastersky J. Anti-fungal therapy in patients with fever and neutropenia: more rational and less empirical? N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 1445–1447.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Annaloro C, Oriana A, Tagliaferri E, et al. Efficacy of different prophylactic antifungal regimens in bone marrow transplantation. Haematologica. 1995; 80: 512–517.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Morgenstern GR, Prentice AG, Prentice HG, Ropner JE, Schey SA, Warnock DW, on behalf of the U.K. Multicentre Antifungal Prophylaxis Study Group. A randomized controlled trial of itraconazole versus fluconazole for the prevention of fungal infections in patients with haematological malignancies. Br J Haematol. 1999; 105: 901–911.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hüijgens PG, Simoons-Smit AM, van Loenen AC, et al. Flucona-zole versus itraconazole for the prevention of fungal infections in haemato-oncology. J Clin Pathol. 1999; 52: 376–380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Winston DJ, Maziarz RT, Chandrasekar PH, et al. Intravenous and oral itraconazole versus intravenous and oral fluconazole for long-term anti-fungal prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant recipients. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138: 705–713.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Marr KA, Crippa F, Leisenring W, et al. Itraconazole versus flu-conazole for prevention of fungal infections in patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplants. Blood. 2004; 103: 1527–1533.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Falagas ME, Vardakas KZ, Michalopoulos A. In meta-analysis itraconazole is superior to fluconazole for prophylaxis of systemic fungal infection in the treatment of haematological malignancies: response to Prentice et al. Br J Haematol. 2006; 132: 658–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Prentice AG, Glasmacher A, Djulbegvic B. In meta-analysis itraconazole is superior to fluconazole for prophylaxis of systemic fungal infection in the treatment of haematological malignancies. Br J Haematol. 2006; 132: 656–658.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yamaguchi N, Ito Y, Ohyashiki K. Increased intracellular activity of matrix metalloproteinases in neutrophils may be associated with delayed healing of infection without neutropenia in myelodysplastic syndromes. Ann Hematol. 2005; 84: 383–388.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mühlemann K, Wenger C, Zenhäesern R, Täuber MG. Risk factors for invasive aspergillosis in neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies. Leukemia. 2005; 19: 545–550.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Maschmeyer G, Ruhnke M. Update on antifungal treatment of invasive Candida and Aspergillus infections. Mycoses. 2003; 47: 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kamaluddin M, McNally P, Breatnach F, et al. Potentiation of vincristine toxicity by itraconazole in children with lymphoid malignancies. Acta Paediatr. 2001; 90: 1204–1207.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kageyama S, Masuya M, Tanaka I, et al. Plasma concentration of itraconazole and prophylactic efficacy in patients with neutropenia after chemotherapy for acute leukemia. J Infect Chemother 1999; 5: 213–216.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Prentice AG, Glasmacher A. Making sense of itraconazole pharmacokinetics. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005; 56(suppl 1): i17-i22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

About this article

Cite this article

Ito, Y., Ohyashiki, K., Yoshida, I. et al. The prophylactic effect of itraconazole capsules and fluconazole capsules for systemic fungal infections in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes: a japanese multicenter randomized, controlled study. Int J Hematol 85, 121–127 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1532/IJH97.06079

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1532/IJH97.06079

Key words

Navigation