Immunomodulatory Therapy for Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Progress in Hematology

Abstract

Thalidomide and lenalidomide belong to the proprietary group of immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) that display broad biologic and pharmacologic properties. Encouraging results of clinical studies that evaluated the efficacy of thalidomide in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) led to the investigation of its structural analogue, lenalidomide, in patients with lower-risk MDS. The cumulative results of studies that tested lenalidomide in patients with interstitial deletion of chromosome 5q, ie, del(5q), showed a high frequency of both erythroid and cytogenetic responses (approximately 75% of patients), which led to US Food and Drug Administration approval of this agent for this cytogenetically defined MDS subset. A multicenter phase III study (MDS-002) that investigated the frequency of transfusion response in lower-risk non-del(5q) MDS patients showed that lenalidomide had significant erythropoietic activity, albeit less robust in lower-risk MDS without del(5q). These studies established lenalidomide as an active erythropoietic-remitting agent with novel cytogenetic-remitting activity in lower-risk MDS patients who would not otherwise benefit from therapy with erythropoietic growth factors. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines recently added lenalidomide to the therapeutic algorithm for MDS as front-line therapy for lower-risk MDS patients with del(5q) and transfusion-dependent anemia.

Key words

Myelodysplastic syndromes Thalidomide Lenalidomide Immunomodulatory therapy del(5q) 

References

  1. 1.
    Vardiman JW, Harris NL, Brunning RD. The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of the myeloid neoplasms.Blood. 2002;100:2292–2302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hellstrom-Lindberg E. Efficacy of erythropoietin in the myelodysplastic syndromes: a meta-analysis of 205 patients from 17 studies.Br J Haematol. 1995;89:67–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Naing A, Sokol L, List AF. Developmental therapeutics for myelodysplastic syndromes. JNatl Compr Canc Netw. 2006;4:78–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bellamy WT, Richter L, Sirjani D, et al. Vascular endothelial cell growth factor is an autocrine promoter of abnormal localized immature myeloid precursors and leukemia progenitor formation in myelodysplastic syndromes.Blood. 2001;97:1427–1434.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, et al. Proposals for the classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes.Br J Haematol. 1982;51:189–199.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau M, et al. International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes.Blood. 1997;89:2079–2088.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kantarjian H, et al. Report of an international working group to standardize response criteria for myelodysplastic syndromes.Blood. 2000;96:3671–3674.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Giagounidis AA, Germing U, Aul C. Biological and prognostic significance of chromosome 5q deletions in myeloid malignancies.Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:5–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van den Berghe H, Cassiman JJ, David G, Fryns JP, Michaux JL, Sokal G. Distinct haematological disorder with deletion of long arm no. 5 chromosome.Nature. 1974;251:437–438.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Giagounidis AA, Germing U, Haase S, et al. Clinical, morphological, cytogenetic, and prognostic features of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and del(5q) including band q31.Leukemia. 2004;18:113–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Raza A, Meyer P, Dutt D, et al. Thalidomide produces transfusion independence in long-standing refractory anemias of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.Blood. 2001;98:958–965.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Revlimid [package insert]. Summit, NJ: Celgene Corp; July 2006.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bartlett JB, Dredge K, Dalgleish AG. The evolution of thalidomide and its IMiD derivatives as anticancer agents.Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:314–322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zorat F, Shetty V, Dutt D, et al. The clinical and biological effects of thalidomide in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.BrJ Haematol. 2001;115:881–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moreno-Aspitia A, Geyer S, Li C, et al. N998B: multicenter phase II trial of thalidomide (Thal) in adult patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) [abstract].Blood. 2002;100:96a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tamburini J, Elie C, Vassilief D, et al. Low doses of thalidomide (Thal) in low risk MDS with transfusion-dependant anemia: the GFM THAL-SMD-200 trial [abstract].Blood. 2006;108:756a. Abstract 2673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    List A, Kurtin S, Roe DJ, et al. Efficacy of lenalidomide in myelodysplastic syndromes.N Engl J Med. 2005;352:549–557.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    List AF, Baker AF, Green S, Bellamy W. Lenalidomide: targeted anemia therapy for myelodysplastic syndromes.Cancer Control. 2006;13(Suppl):4–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    List A, Dewald G, Bennett J, et al. Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1456–1465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Raza A, Reeves JE, Feldman EJ, et al. Long term clinical benefit of lenalidomide (Revlimid) treatment in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome without del 5q cytogenetic abnormalities [abstract].Blood. 2006;108:78a. Abstract 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology V.1.2007. Myelodysplastic syndromes. Available at: http://www.nccn.org. Accessed October 16, 2007.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kurtin S, Sokol L. Practical considerations in the use of lenalidomide therapy for myelodysplastic syndromes.Cancer Control. 2006;13(Suppl):26–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society of Hematology 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research InstituteUniversity of South Florida College of MedicineTampaUSA
  2. 2.Division of Malignant Hematology, Department of Interdisciplinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research InstituteUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations