Skip to main content

Legislating the pandemic: A global survey of HIV/AIDS in criminal law

Abstract

There have been increasing numbers of prosecutions and convictions of HIV-positive persons worldwide. This article reviews laws in a variety of countries used to prosecute HIV-positive people for HIV-related offenses and gives descriptions of some of the more common terms used in these prosecutions. It examines the types of criminal codes, most often not HIV-specific, that have been applied to criminal cases, legislation passed specifically to deal with HIV, as well as some central legal cases. In addition, the paper offers warnings about the continued application of criminal law to HIV/AIDS, either through current statutes or through new HIV-specific legislation. Most experts in the field call for a review of current laws and for the necessary reforms to ensure basic human rights.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • AIDS Law Project South Africa. (1999). Response paper to the South African Law Commission’s discussion paper. Retrieved January 24, 2005, from http://www.hri.ca/partners/alp

  • Ayres, I., & Baker, K. (n.d.). A separate crime of reckless sex. Retrieved January 24, 2005, from http://islandia.law.yale.edu/ayers/resklesssex.pdf

  • Bennett, R., Draper, H., & Frith, L. (2000). Ignorance is bliss? HIV and moral duties and legal duties to forewarn. Journal of Medical Ethics, 26, 9–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, D. (1999). The Law and HIV transmission: Help or hindrance? Venereology, 12(2), 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian HIV Legal Network. (1999). Criminal code offences applied in Canadian prosecutions. Retrieved February 7, 2005, from http://www.aidslaw.ca/Maincontent/issues/criminallaw/e-info-cla2.htm

  • Clarke, T. (2004, November 16). HIV man jailed again. The Courier-Mail. Retrieved January 24, 2005, from http://www.couriermail.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,11405977%255E1702,00.html

  • Closen, M. L., Bobinski, M. A., Hermann, D. H. J., Hernandez, J. F., Schultz, G. P., & Strader, J. K. (1994). Criminalization of an epidemic: HIV-AIDS and criminal exposure laws. Arkansas Law Review, 46, 921–929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (1993). Comparative study on discrimination against persons with HIV or AIDS. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Criminal Code of Canada, s245: Administering a Noxious Substance.

  • Dalton, H. L. (1993). Criminal law. In S. Burris, H. Dalton, J. Miller, & Yale AIDS Law Project (Eds.), AIDS law today: A new guide for the public. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dine, J., & Watt, B. (1998). The transmission of disease during consensual sexual activity and the concept of associative autonomy. Web Journal of Current Legal Issues. Retrieved January 24, 2005, from http://webjcli.ncl.ac.uk/1998/issue4/watt4.html

  • Dwyer, J. (1993). Legislating AIDS away: The limited role of legal persuasion in minimizing the spread of HIV. Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, 9, 167.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, R. (1997). Criminal law & HIV/AIDS: Final report. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network and Canadian AIDS Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R. (2002). Criminal law, public health and HIV transmission: A policy options paper. Geneva, Switzerland: UNAIDS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, L. (1999). It oughtta be a crime? Criminalizing HIV. Body Positive of NY, 12(1). Retrieved January 24, 2005, from http://www.thebody.com/bp/jan99/oughtta.html

  • Field, M., & Sullivan, K. (1987). AIDS and the criminal law. Law, Medicine & Health Care, 15 (1–2), 46–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fluss, S. S. (1992). National AIDS legislation: An overview of some global developments. In L. Gostin & L. Porter (Eds.), International law and AIDS: International response, current issues, and future directions (p. 3). Washington, DC: American Bar Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gostin, L. (1989). The politics of AIDS: Compulsory state powers, public health, and civil liberties. Ohio State Law Journal, 49, 1017–1058.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. H. (1992). The criminalization of HIV. In N. D. Hunter & W. B. Rubenstein (Eds.), AIDS agenda: Emerging issues in civil rights (pp. 239–261). New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, S. (1992). Criminalizing HIV transmission: Lessons from history and a model for the future. Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, 8, 245–273.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarini, Z., Bray, S., & Burns, S. (2002). Evaluating the impact of criminal laws on HIV risk behavior. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 30, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarini, Z., & Klitzman, R. (2002). HIV and the law: Integrating law, policy, and social epidemiology. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 30, 533–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, A., & Worth, H. (2005). Mad and bad: HIV infection, mental illness, intellectual disability, and the law. Sexuality Research & Social Policy: Journal of NSRC, 2(2), 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McColgin, D. L., & Hey, E. T. (1997). Criminal law. In D. Webber (Ed.), AIDS and the law (3rd ed., pp. 259–345 [supplement]). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzker, M. L., Mindell, D. P., Xiao-Mei, L., Ptak, R., Gibbs, R., & Hillis, D. (2002). Molecular evidence of HIV-1 transmission in a criminal case. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(22), 14292–14297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (2005). African immigrant damnation syndrome: The case of Charles Ssenyonga. Sexuality Research & Social Policy: Journal of NSRC, 2(2), 31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison v. State of Florida, 673 So.2d 953 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App., 4th Dist. May 22, 1996).

  • Offences Against the Person Act 1861, Section 23, Crown Protection Services (United Kingdom).

  • Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. (2002, July 25–26). HIV/AIDS and human rights: International guidelines. Third International Consultation on HIV/ AIDS and Human Rights. Geneva: United Nations. Retrieved January, 24, 2005, from www.unaids.org/html/pub/Publications/IRC-pub02/JC905-Guideline6_en_pdf.pdf

  • Paget, D. Z. (1998). HIV/AIDS and the legislature: An international comparison. AIDS Care, 10(1), 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panossian, A. A., Panossian, V., & Doumanian, N. P. (1998). Criminalization of perinatal HIV transmission. Journal of Legal Medicine, 19(2), 223–255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, M. (2005). Social responses to HIV: Fearing the outlaw. Sexuality Research & Social Policy: Journal of NSRC, 2(2), 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickett, C. (1990). AIDS, sexually transmitted diseases and the criminal law. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 20, 183–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rv. Dica, [EWCA] Crim 1103 (05 May 2004), [2004] 3 All ER 593.

  • Rv. Tan, (1995, May 23), Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench, Edmonton, unreported, Ritter J.

  • R v. Thissen, unreported, 16 May 1996, Ont Ct (Prov Div).

  • Rv. Thornton [1993] 2 SCR445, 82 CCC (3d) 530,21CR (4th) 215, aff’d (1991), 3 CR (4th) 381, 1 OR (3d) 480 (CA).

  • R v. Wentzell, (1989, December 8), unreported, CR No. 10888, Halifax County Court, Nova Scotia.

  • Smallwood v. State of Maryland, 1996 WL 428978 (1 August 1996).

  • South African Law Commission. (2001). Fifth interim report on aspects of the law relating to AIDS: The need for a statutory offence aimed at harmful HIV-related behavior. Retrieved September 14, 2004, from http://www.law.wits.ac.za/salc/report/report.html

  • Sullivan, K., & Field, M. (1988). AIDS and the coercive power of the state. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 23(1), 139–198.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). (1999). Handbook for legislators on HIV/AIDS, law and human rights: Action to combat HIV/AIDS in view of its devastating human, economic, and social impact. Geneva, Switzerland: UNAIDS.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNAIDS. (n.d.). Agenda for action: Background materials to the 4th World Conference on Women. Geneva: United Nations.

  • Weinberg, P., Hounshell, J., Sherman, L., Godwin, J., Ali, S., Tomori, C., et al. (2002). Legal, financial, and public health consequences of HIV contamination of blood and blood products in the 1980s and 1990s. Annals of Internal Medicine, 136(4), 312–319.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (1989). Legislative response to AIDS. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worth, H. (2002). Dissonant discourses: HIV positive refugees and the media in New Zealand. Feminist Media Studies, 2(1), 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worth, H., Goldstein, D., & Patton, C. (2005). Introduction to reckless vectors: The infecting “other” in HIV/AIDS law. Sexuality Research & Social Policy: Journal of NSRC, 2(2), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather Worth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Worth, H., Patton, C. & McGehee, M.T. Legislating the pandemic: A global survey of HIV/AIDS in criminal law. Sex Res Soc Policy 2, 15 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1525/srsp.2005.2.2.15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/srsp.2005.2.2.15

Key words

  • criminal codes
  • criminalization of HIV
  • HIV-specific law