Marriage amendments and lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals in the 2006 election

  • Ellen D. B. Riggle
  • Sharon S. Rostosky
  • Sharon G. Horne
Same-Sex Marriage Supplement

Abstract

More than half of U.S. states have passed amendments to their constitutions excluding same-sex couples from civil marriage. The impact of these ballot initiatives and debates on lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals has been underresearched. Extending research on racial and ethnic minority groups, as well as research on LGB groups, the study discussed in this article hypothesized that LGB individuals would encounter more negative messages, be at risk for negative psychological effects, and increase their political activities, including voting, during elections with marriage amendments on the ballot. A national cross-sectional online survey of 1,824 LGB participants conducted postelection in November 2006 confirmed these hypotheses.

Key words

depression media minority stress voting behavior LGB 

References

  1. Andresen, E. M., Malmgren, J. A., Carter, W. B., & Patrick, D. L. (1994). Screening for depression in well older adults: Evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale).American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 10, 77–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Avery, J. M. (2006). The sources and consequences of political mistrust among African Americans.American Politics Research, 34, 653–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Badgett, M. V. L. (2001).Money, myths, and change: The economic lives of lesbians and gay men. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Black, D., Gates, G., Sanders, S. G., & Taylor, L. (2000). Demographics of the gay and lesbian population in the United States: Evidence from available systematic data sources.Demography, 37, 139–154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cahill, S. (2007). The anti-gay marriage movement. In C. Rimmerman & C. Wilcox (Eds.),The politics of same-sex marriage (pp. 155–192). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cho, W. T., & Cain, B. E. (2001). Asian Americans as the median voters: An exploration of attitudes and voting patterns on ballot initiatives. In G. H. Chang (Ed.),Asian Americans and politics: Perspectives, experiences, prospects. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press & Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cochran, S. D. (2001). Emerging issues in research on lesbians’ and gay men’s mental health: Does sexual orientation really matter?American Psychologist, 56, 931–947.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, S., & Williamson, G. (1988). Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In S. Spacapan & S. Oskamp (Eds.),The social psychology of health: Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology (pp. 31–67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Donovan, T., Wenzel, J., & Bowler, S. (2000). Direct democracy and gay rights initiatives after Romer. In C. A. Rimmerman, K. D. Wald, & C. Wilcox (Eds.),The politics of gay rights (pp. 161–191). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Edelman, M. (1993). Understanding the gay and lesbian vote in ’92.Public Perspectives, 4(3), 32–33.Google Scholar
  11. Frederick, D. (2007). Gay power. Retrieved June 13, 2008, fromhttp://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/ 2007/08/gay-power.html Google Scholar
  12. Gamble, B. S. (1997). Putting civil rights to a popular vote.American Journal of Political Science, 41, 245–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haider-Markel, D. P., Querze, A., & Lindaman, K. (2007). Lose, win, or draw? A reexamination of direct democracy and minority rights.Political Research Quarterly, 60, 304–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamilton, A., Madison, J., & Jay, J. (1961).The federalist papers. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
  15. Hertzog, M. (1996).The lavender vote: Lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals in American electoral politics. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kim, C. J., & Lee, T. (2001). Interracial politics: Asian Americans and other communities of color.PS: Political Science & Politics, 34, 631–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leighley, J. E., & Vedlitz, A. (1999). Race, ethnicity, and political participation: Competing models and contrasting explanations.The Journal of Politics, 61, 1092–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Levitt, H. M., Ovrebo, E., Anderson-Cleveland, M. B., Leone, C., Jeong, J. Y., Arm, J. R., et al. (2009). Balancing dangers: GLBT experience in a time of anti-GLBT legislation.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meyer, I. H. (1995). Minority stress and mental health in gay men.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, 38–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence.Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674–697.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Pinello, D. (2006).America’s struggle for same-sex marriage. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Riggle, E. D. B., & Rostosky, S. S. (2007). The consequences of marriage policy for same-sex couples’ well-being. In C. Rimmerman & C. Wilcox (Eds.),The politics of same-sex marriage (pp. 65–84). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Riggle, E. D. B., Rostosky, S. S., & Reedy, C. S. (2005). Online surveys for BGLT research: Issues and techniques.Journal of Homosexuality, 49(2), 1–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Riggle, E. D. B., Thomas, J. D., & Rostosky, S. S. (2005). The marriage debate and minority stress.PS: Political Science and Politics, 38, 221–224.Google Scholar
  25. Rimmerman, C., & Wilcox, C. (Eds.). (2007).The politics of same-sex marriage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Rippey, P. F. (2008, April).What makes it right(s)?Same-sex marriage bans and putting rights to a vote. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  27. Rostosky, S. S., Riggle, E. D. B., Home, S. G., & Miller, A. D. (2009). Marriage amendments and psychological distress in lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) adults.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 56–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rothblum, E. D. (2007, August).Same-sex couples in legalized relationships: I do, or do I? Paper presented at the 63rd annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  29. Russell, G. M. (2000).Voted out: The psychological consequences of anti-gay politics. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Russell, G. M. (2004). The dangers of a same-sex marriage referendum for community and individual well-being: A summary of research and findings.Angles: The Policy Journal of the Institute for Gay and Lesbian Strategic Studies, 7(1), 1–3.Google Scholar
  31. Russell, G. M., & Richards, J. A. (2003). Stressor and resilience factors for lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals confronting antigay politics.American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 313–328.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Saito, L. T., & Park, E. J. W. (2000). Multiracial collaborations and coalitions. In P. M. Ong (Ed.),The state of Asian Pacific America, vol. TV: Transforming race relations (pp. 631–637). Los Angeles: UCLA Asian American Studies Center.Google Scholar
  33. Sanchez, G. R. (2006). The role of group consciousness in political participation among Latinos in the United States.American Politics Research, 34, 427–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schaffner, B., & Senic, N. (2006). Rights or benefits? Explaining the sexual identity gap in American political behavior.Political Research Quarterly, 59, 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Segura, G. M. (2005). A symposium on the politics of same-sex marriage: An introduction and commentary.PS: Political Science and Politics, 38, 189–193.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, M. A. (2001). The contingent effects of ballot initiatives and candidate races on turnout.American Journal of Political Science, 45, 700–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tadlock, B. L., Gordon, C. A., & Popp, E. (2007). Framing the issue of same-sex marriages: Traditional values vs. equal rights. In C. Rimmerman & C. Wilcox (Eds.),The politics of same-sex marriage (pp. 193–214). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegan, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Wong, J. S., Lien, P., & Conway, M. M. (2005). Group-based resources and political participation among Asian Americans.American Politics Research, 33, 545–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zimmerman, J. F. (1986).Participatory democracy: Populism revived. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ellen D. B. Riggle
    • 1
  • Sharon S. Rostosky
    • 2
  • Sharon G. Horne
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of KentuckyLexington
  2. 2.Department of Educational and Counseling PsychologyUniversity of KentuckyLexington
  3. 3.Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology and ResearchUniversity of MemphisMemphis

Personalised recommendations