Advertisement

What’s love got to do with it?: Experiences of Lesbian, Gay, and bisexual people with intellectual disabilities in the united kingdom and views of the staff who support them

  • David AbbottEmail author
  • Jan BurnsEmail author
Special Issue Articles

Abstract

The voices of lesbian, gay, and bisexual people with intellectual disabilities have rarely been heard within both policy and research. This article reports on a research study involving gay, lesbian, and bisexual people with intellectual disabilities. Results highlighted that, despite many barriers, lesbian, gay, and bisexual people with intellectual disabilities wanted to develop sexual and intimate relationships. Love was a frequently discussed need and desire among study participants. Interviews with staff who worked with this population revealed that supporting their being in an intimate relationship did not feature strongly in staff goals. This disjuncture may partly account for the dearth of sexual relationships among the people with intellectual disabilities interviewed for this study, as well as for their accounts of isolation, loneliness, and depression. The findings have implications for staff and service providers, as well as for social policies addressing disability, which do not routinely reference sexuality and personal relationships.

Keywords

relationships discrimination barriers staff attitudes sexuality 

References

  1. Abbott, D., & Howarth, J. (2005). Secret loves, hidden lives? Exploring issues for people with learning difficulties who are gay, lesbian, or bisexual. Bristol, England: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  2. Abbott, D., & Howarth, J. (2007). Still off-limits? Staff views on supporting gay, lesbian, and bisexual people with intellectual disabilities to develop sexual and intimate relationships. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 20, 116–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, J. (2003). Gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people with developmental disabilities and mental retardation. New York: Harrington Park Press.Google Scholar
  4. Arksey, H. (2004). Semi-structured and unstructured interviewing. In S. Becker & A. Bryman (Eds.), Understanding research for social policy and practice (pp. 268–275). Bristol, England: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barnes, D. (1997). A legacy of oppression: A history of disability in Western culture. In L. Barton & M. Oliver (Eds.), Disability studies: Past, present and future (pp. 3–24). Leeds, England: The Disability Press.Google Scholar
  6. Basson, R. (1998). Sexual health of women with disabilities. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 159, 359–362.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Baxter, C., Poonia, K., Ward, L., & Nadirshaw, Z. (1990). Double discrimination: Issues and services for people with learning difficulties and their families from Black and ethnic minority communities. London: King’s Fund/CRE.Google Scholar
  8. Bayley, M. (1997). What price friendship: Encouraging the relationships of people with learning difficulties. Wootton Courtenay, England: Hexagon Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, H., Croft-White, C., Wilson, C., & Stein, J. (2000). Taking the initiative: Supporting the sexual rights of disabled people. Brighton, England: Pavilion.Google Scholar
  10. Burchardt, T. (2000). Enduring economic exclusion: Disabled people, income and work. York, England: York Publishing Services.Google Scholar
  11. Burns, J. (2000, March). Gender identity and women with learning disabilities: The third sex. Clinical Psychology Forum, 137, 11–15.Google Scholar
  12. Cambridge, P. (1997a). HIV, sex, and learning disability. Brighton, England: Pavilion.Google Scholar
  13. Cambridge, P. (1997b). How far to gay: The politics of HIV in learning disability. Disability & Society, 12, 427–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carlson, L. (2001). Cognitive ableism and disability studies: Feminist reflections on the history of mental retardation. Hypatia, 16(4), 124–146.Google Scholar
  15. Chivers, J., & Mathieson, S. (2000). Training in sexuality and relationships: An Australian model. Sexuality and Disability, 18, 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clarke, S., & Finnegan, P. (2005). One law for all? The impact of the human rights act on people with learning difficulties. London: Values Into Action.Google Scholar
  17. Corbett, J. (1997). Independent, proud and special: Celebrating our differences. In L. Barton & M. Oliver (Eds.), Disability studies: Past, present and future (pp. 90–98). Leeds, England: The Disability Press.Google Scholar
  18. Craft, A. (1994). Practice issues in sexuality and learning disabilities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Davidson-Paine, C., & Corbett, J. (1995). A double coming out: Gay men with learning disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 147–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davies, D. (2000). Sex and relationship facilitation project for people with disabilities. Sexuality and Disability, 18, 187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davis, A., Eley, R., Flynn, M., Flynn, P., & Roberts, G. (1995). To have and have not: Addressing issues of poverty. In T. Philpot & L. Ward (Eds.), Values and visions: Changing ideas in services for people with learning difficulties (pp. 334–345). Oxford, England: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  22. Department of Health. (2001). Valuing people: A new strategy for learning disability for the 21st century. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  23. Galea, J., Butler, J., & Ianco, T. (2004). The assessment of sexual knowledge in people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 29, 350–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  25. Heyman, B., & Huckle, S. (1995). Sexuality as a perceived hazard in the lives of adults with learning disabilities. Disability & Society, 11, 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Human Rights Act, 1998, c. 42 (Eng.).Google Scholar
  27. Jahoda, A., Dagnan, D., Jarvie, P., & Kerr, W. (2006). Depression, social context, and cognitive behavioural therapy for people who have intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 19, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. King, M., & McKeown, E. (2003). Mental health and social well-being of gay men, lesbians, and bisexuals in England and Wales. London: MIND.Google Scholar
  29. Kitzinger, C. (1989). Liberal humanism and an ideology of social control: The regulation of lesbian identities. In. J. Shotter and K. Gergen (Eds.), Texts of identity (pp. 82–98). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Mason, A., & Palmer, A. (1997). Queerbashing. London: Stonewall.Google Scholar
  31. McCarthy, M. (1999). Sexuality and women with learning disabilities. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  32. Mencap. (1999). Living in fear: The need to combat bullying of people with learning disabilities. London: Author.Google Scholar
  33. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. (2004). Breaking the cycle—Taking stock of progress and priorities for the future. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  34. Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit. (2005). Improving the life chances of disabled people. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  35. Rivers, I. (2002). Developmental issues for lesbian and gay youth. In A. Coyle & C. Kitzinger (Eds.), Lesbian and gay psychology: New perspectives (pp. 30–44). Oxford, England: BPS Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Shakespeare, T. (2000). Disabled sexuality: Towards rights and recognition. Sexuality and Disability, 18, 159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shuttleworth, R., & Mona, L. (2002). Disability and sexuality: Towards a focus on sexual access. Disability Studies Quarterly, 22(4), 2–9.Google Scholar
  38. Taylor, S., & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods: The search for meaning. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  39. Thompson, A., Bryson, M., & Castell, S. (2001). Prospects for identity formation for lesbian, gay or bisexual persons with developmental disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 48, 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thompson, D. (2001). Is sex a good thing for men with learning disabilities? Tizard Learning Disability Review, 6(1), 4–12.Google Scholar
  41. Thompson, D., & Brown, H. (1997). Response-Ability: Working with men with learning disabilities who have difficult or abusive sexual behaviour. Brighton, England: Pavilion.Google Scholar
  42. Ussher, J. M. (1997). Framing the sexual “other”: The regulation of lesbian and gay sexuality. In J. M. Ussher (Ed.), Body talk: The material and discursive regulation of sexuality, madness and reproduction (pp. 131–158). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Williams, C. (1995). Invisible victims: Crime and abuse against people with learning difficulties. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norah Fry Research CentreUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.Centre for Social & Psychological Development, SalomonsCanterbury Christ Church UniversityKentUK

Personalised recommendations