Sexuality Research & Social Policy

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 38–57 | Cite as

Naming names: Perceptions of name-based HIV reporting, partner notification, and criminalization of non-disclosure among persons living with HIV

  • Robert Klitzman
  • Sheri Kirshenbaum
  • Lauren Kittel
  • Stephen Morin
  • Shaira Daya
  • Maddalena Mastrogiacomo
  • Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus


Policies of name-based HIV reporting, partner notification (PN), and criminalization of non-disclosure of HIV positive status to sexual partners remain controversial. The views of people living with HIV (PLH) are critical to the success of these three initiatives, but have been understudied. Thus, we interviewed 76 PLH about these policies. Themes arose of potential public health benefits (e.g., epidemiological surveillance and notification of possible exposure) and costs (e.g., deterrence of testing); threats to privacy, civil rights and relationships; government mistrust; and beliefs that prevention is an individual, not governmental responsibility. Misperceptions about the intent, content and scope of these policies, and past experiences of discrimination, shaped these attitudes. To enhance development and implementation of HIV prevention strategies, the views of PLH must be taken into account, and education campaigns need to address misperceptions and mistrust. These data shed light on difficulties in developing and implementing policies that may affect sexual behavior, and have critical implications for future research.

Key words

ethics risk behavior disclosure 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). (1997, October). HIV surveillance and name reporting: A public health case for protecting civil liberties. An American Civil Liberties Union Report. Retrieved June 14, 2002, from Privacy/ Privacy.cfm?ID=14512&c=27 Google Scholar
  2. Aragon, R. & Myers, J. (1999). HIV testing after implementation of name-based reporting. JAMA, 281(15), 1377–378.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bayer, R. (1989). Private acts, social consequences: AIDS and the politics of public health. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burris, S. (2000). Surveillance, social risk, and symbolism: Framing the analysis for research and policy. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 25(Suppl 2), 120–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carballo-Dieguez, A., Remien, R.H., Benson, D.A., Dolezal, C., Decena, C.U., & Blank, S. (2002). Intention to notify sexual partners about potential HIV exposure among New York City STD clinics’ clients. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  6. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). (1998). Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-infected adults and adolescents. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 47(RR5), 42–82.Google Scholar
  7. CDC. (1999). Guidelines for national human immunodeficiency virus case surveillance, including monitoring for human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 48(RR13), 1–28.Google Scholar
  8. CDC. (2000). HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report: US HIV and AIDS cases reported through June 2000. Department of Health and Human Services Report, 12(2), 5–10.Google Scholar
  9. CDC. (2001). Revised guidelines for HIV counseling, testing referral. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 50, 1–58.Google Scholar
  10. CDC. (2003). HIV/AIDS update: A glance at the HIV epidemic (a surveillance). Retrieved December 30, 2003, from At-a-Glance.pdf Google Scholar
  11. CDC. (2004). Implementation of named HIV reporting—New York City, 2001. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 52(51), 1248–1252.Google Scholar
  12. Colfax, G.N., & Bindman, A.B. (1998). Health benefits and risks of reporting HIV infected individuals by name. American Journal of Public Health, 88(6), 876–879.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Crepaz, N., & Marks, G. (2003). Serostatus disclosure, sexual communication and safer sex in HIV-positive men. AIDS Care, 15(3), 379–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dolbear, G., Wojtowycz, M., & Newell, L. (2002). Named reporting and mandatory partner notification in New York state: The effect on consent for perinatal HIV testing. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 79, 238–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fairchild, A., & Bayer, R. (1999). Uses and abuses of Tuskegee. Science, 24, 910–913.Google Scholar
  16. Golden, M., Hogbed, M., Hansfield, H., St. Lawrence, J., Potterat, J., & Holmes, K. (2003). Partner notification for HIV and STD in the United States: Low coverage for gonorrhea, chlamydial infection, and HIV. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 30, 490–496.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Golden, M., Hopkins, S., Morris, M., Holmes, K., & Handsfield, H.H. (2003). Support among persons infected with HIV for routine health department contact for HIV partner notification. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 32, 196–202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hecht, F.M., Chesney, M.A., Lehman, J.S., Osmond, D., Vranizan, D.K., Colman, S., Keane, D., Reingold, A., Bindman, A.B., & MESH Study Group. (2000). Does HIV reporting by name deter testing? AIDS, 14, 1801–1808.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Herek, G., Capitanio, J., & Widaman, K. (2003). Stigma, social risk, and health policy: Public attitudes toward HIV surveillance policies and the social construction of illness. Health Psychology, 22, 533–540.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Janssen, R., Holtgrave, D., Valdiserri, R., Shepherd, M., Gayle, H., & De Cock, K. (2001). The serostatus approach to fighting the HIV epidemic: Prevention strategies for infected individuals. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 1019–1024.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kegeles, S.M., Coates, T.J., Lo, B., & Catania, J. (1989). Mandatory reporting of HIV testing would deter men from being tested. JAMA, 261, 1275–1276.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Klitzman, R., & Bayer, R. (2003). Mortal secrets: Truth and lies in the age of AIDS. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Landis, S., Schoenbach, V., Weber, D., Mittal, M., Krishan, B., Lewis, K., & Koch, G. (1992). Results of randomized trial of partner notification in cases of HIV infection in North Carolina. New England Journal of Medicine, 326(2), 101–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lazzarini, Z., Bray, S., & Burris, S. (2002). Evaluating the impact of criminal laws on HIV risk behavior. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 30(2), 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lazzarini, Z., & Klitzman, R. (2002). HIV and the law: Integrating law, policy, and social epidemiology. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 30(4), 533–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Macke, B., & Maher, J. (1999). Partner notification in the United States: An evidence based review. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 17(3), 230–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morin, S.F. (2000). Early detection of HIV: Assessing the legislative context. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 25(Suppl. 2), 144–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nakashima, A.K., Horsley, R., Frey, R.L., Sweeney, P.A., Weber, J.T., & Fleming, P.L. (1998). Effect of HIV reporting by name on use of HIV testing in publicly funded counseling and testing programs. JAMA, 280(16), 1421–1426.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Osmond, D.H., Bindman, A.B., Vranizan, K., Lehman, J.S., Frederick, M., Keane, D., & Reigngold, A. (1999). Name-based surveillance and public health interventions for persons with HIV infection. Annals of Internal Medicine, 131(10), 775–779.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Patton, M.Q. (1990). Humanistic psychology and humanistic research. Special issue: Human inquiry & the person-centered approach. Person-Centered Review, 5, 191–202.Google Scholar
  31. Rogers, S.M. (1996, July). Partner notification with HIV-infected drug users: Results of formative research. Paper presented at the International AIDS Conference, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  32. Rubin, S.M. (1991, July). Partner notification may deter HIV positive drug users from treatment. Paper presented at the International AIDS Conference, Amsterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  33. Schwarcz, S., McFarland, W., Delgado, V., Adler, B., & Withupp, D. (2001). Partner notification for persons recently infected with HIV: Experience in San Francisco. Journal of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, 28, 403–404.Google Scholar
  34. Schwarcz, S., Stockman, J., Delgado, V., & Scheer, S. (2004). Does name-based HIV reporting deter high-risk persons from HIV testing? Results from San Francisco. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, 35(1), 93–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Solomon, L., & Benjamin, G. (1998). National HIV case reporting. New England Journal of Medicine, 338, 626–627.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Speissegger, L., Wilson, S., & Watson, A. (1999). Criminal transmission and exposure. Retrieved June 14, 2002, from Now at Google Scholar
  37. St. Lawrence, J., Montano, D., Kaprzyk, D., Phillips, W., Armstrong, K., & Leichliter, J. (2002). STD screening, testing, case reporting and clinical and partner notification practices: A national survey of US physicians. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 1784–1788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J.M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory, procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  39. Van Derbeken, J. (2003, December 10). HIV transmission case tossed out. Man didn’t intentionally infect, judge finds. San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved May 26, 2004, from article.cgi?f=/c/a/ 2003/12/10/BAGL53JSM61.DTL Google Scholar
  40. Wasserman, S., & Watson, A. (2000). Partner notification programs. Retrieved June 14, 2002, from Now at Google Scholar
  41. Woods, W., Binson, D., Morin, S., & Dilley, J.W. (1999). HIV testing after implementation of name-based reporting. JAMA, 281(15), 1377–1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Klitzman
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sheri Kirshenbaum
    • 1
  • Lauren Kittel
    • 1
  • Stephen Morin
    • 3
  • Shaira Daya
    • 1
  • Maddalena Mastrogiacomo
    • 1
  • Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral StudiesNew York State Psychiatric InstituteUSA
  2. 2.Center for BioethicsColumbia UniversityNew York
  3. 3.Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, Department of MedicineUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan Francisco
  4. 4.University of CaliforniaLos Angeles
  5. 5.Neuropsychiatric InstituteCenter for Community HealthLos Angeles

Personalised recommendations