Abstract
Invasive plants are non-native, but in most cases naturalised, species that have successfully spread outside of their native range. Aliens invaded all habitats, are competing with native plants, thus, after the direct destruction of habitats, invasions are recognised as the second largest danger for biodiversity. Northern Red Oak is one of the most common invasive tree species dispersed primarily by birds, but new studies have shown that it is also spread continuously in a forest stand. The main aim of our research was to check how strong is the invasion of Northern Red Oak in Silesia Park, where it was introduced together with other alien plant species, and how this invasion interacts with bird diversity. Silesia Park was created 65 years ago on the surface largely ravaged by coal industry. Because many studies indicate birds as vectors of alien plants invasion, we examined the bird fauna in a described area, looking for species that can contribute to spreading oaks. Research showed the diversity of 50 bird species. Surface with a presence of Northern Red Oak was characterised by greater participation of alien plant species than the patch of natural forest, which existed there long before the park creation. The greatest bird diversity was found in the most natural part of Silesia Park, and the lowest in the area of invasion, especially in the case of species classified as “forest birds”. The presence of alien plants increased number of “non-forest” birds, mostly synanthropic species. We also found that Northern Red Oak spreads by spontaneous seed dispersal.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Adamowski W., Dvorak I. & Ramaniuk I. 2002. Atlas of alien woody species of the Bialowieza Primaeval Forest. Atlas obcych gatunków drzewiastych Puszczy Białowieskiej. Phytocoenosis Supplementum Cartographiae Geobotanicae 14: 1–304.
Angelstam P., Roberge J.-M., Lõhmus A., Bergmanis M., Brazaitis G., Breuss M., Edenius L., Kosinski Z., Kurlavicius P., Larmanis V., Lukins M., Mikusiński G., Racinskis E., Strazds M. & Tryjanowski P. 2004. Habitat modelling as a tool for landscape-scale conservation–a review of parameters for focal forest birds. Ecol. Bull. 51: 427–453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20113327
Aslan C.E. & Rejmánek M. 2010. Avian use of introduced plants: ornithologist records illuminate interspecific associations and research needs. Ecol. Appl. 20 (4): 1005–1020. PMID: 20597286
Bhullar S. & Majer J. 2000. Arthropods on street trees: a food resource for wildlife. Pac. Conserv. Biol. 6 (2): 171–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/PC000171
Bibby C.J., Burgess N.D., Hill D.A. & Mustoe S.H. 2000. Bird Census Techniques. 2nd Edition. Academic Press, London, 302 pp. ISBN: 9780120958313
Blackburn T.M., Pyšek P., Bacher S. Carlton J.T., Duncan R.P., Jarošík V., Wilson J.R.U. & Richardson D.M. 2011. A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26 (7): 333–339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023
Bolger D.T., Scott T.A. & Rotenberry J.T. 2001. Use of corridorlike landscape structures by bird and small mammal species. Biol. Conserv. 102 (2): 213–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00028-3
Brändle M., Kühn I., Klotz S., Belle C. & Brandl R. 2008. Species richness of herbivores on exotic host plants increases with time since introduction of the host. Divers. Distrib. 14 (6): 905–912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00511.x
Burghardt K.T., Tallamy D.W. & Shriver W.G. 2009. Impact of native plants on bird and butterfly biodiversity in suburban landscapes. Conserv. Biol. 23 (1): 219–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01076.x
Byers J.E. 2002 Impact of non-indigenous species on natives enhanced by anthropogenic alteration of selection regimes. Oikos 97 (3): 449–458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.970316.x
Chmura D. 2004. Penetration and naturalisation of invasive alien plant species (neophytes) in woodlands of the Silesian Upland (southern Poland). Nat. Conserv. 60: 3–11.
Chmura D. 2013. Impact of alien tree species Quercus rubra L. on understory environment and flora: a study of the Silesian Upland (Southern Poland). Pol. J. Ecol. 61 (3): 431–442.
Clem C.S. & Held D.W. 2015. Species richness of eruciform larvae associated with native and alien plants in the southeastern United States. J. Insect Conserv. 19 (5): 987–997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-015-9815-0
Cornelis J. & Hermy M. 2004. Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders. Landsc. Urban Plan 69 (4): 385–401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.038
Crawley M.J., Harvey P.H. & Purvis A. 1996. Comparative ecology of the native and alien floras of the British Isles. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 351 (1345): 1251–1259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1996.0108
Cronk Q.C.B. & Fuller J.L. 1995. Plant Invaders. Chapman & Hall, London, 241 pp. ISBN: 0-412-48380-7
Czech B., Krausman P.R. & Devers P.K. 2000. Economic associations among causes of species endangerment in the United States. BioSci. 50 (7): 593–601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0593:EAACOS]2.0.CO;2
Davis M.A. & Pelson M. 2001. Experimental support for a resource-based mechanistic model of invasibility. Ecol. Lett. 4 (5): 421–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00246.x
Dawson D.G. & Bull P.C. 1975. Counting birds in New Zealand forests. Notornis 22 (2): 101–109.
Didham R.K., Ewers R.M., Gemmell N.J. 2005. Comment on “Avian extinction and mammalian introductions on oceanic islands”. Science 307 (5714): 1412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1107333
Dobson A.P., Bradshaw A.D. & Baker A.J.M. 1997. Hopes for the future: Restoration ecology and conservation biology. Science 277 (5325): 515–522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5325.515
Ehrenfeld J.G. 2003. Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6 (6): 503–523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-002-0151-3
Elton C.S. 1958. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. Methuen, London, 181 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7214-9. ISBN: 978-0-412-11430-4
Fernández-Juricic E. 2000. Bird community composition patterns in urban parks of Madrid: the role of age, size and isolation. Ecol. Res. 15 (4): 373–383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2000.00358.x
Fernández-Juricic E. 2004. Spatial and temporal analysis of the distribution of forest specialists in an urban-fragmented landscape (Madrid, Spain). Implications for local and regional bird conservation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 69 (1): 17–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.09.001
Gazda A. & Augustynowicz P. 2012. Obce gatunki drzew w Polskich lasach gospodarczych: co wiemy o puli obcych gatunków drzew oraz o rozmieszczeniu wybranych taksonów [Alien tree species in the Polish managed forests. What do we know about ‘alien species pool’ and spatial patterns in the distribution of these trees?]. Studia i Materiały CEPL w Rogowie R 14, 33 (4): 53–61.
Gibbons D.W. & Gregory R.D. 2006. Birds. In: Sutherland W.J. (eds), Ecological Census Techniques: A Handbook, 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 446 pp. ISBN-10: 0521606365
Gilbert O.L. 1989. The Ecology of Urban Habitats. Chapman and Hall, London, 369 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0821-5. ISBN: 978-94-010-6855-0
Głowacki D., Sławska M. & Sławski M. 2016. The dynamics of northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) in managed forests of central Poland. Forest Res. Pap. 77 (1): 32–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/frp-2016-0004
Gimeno I., Vilà M. & Hulme P.E. 2006. Are islands more susceptible to plant invasion than continents? A test using Oxalis pes-caprae in the western Mediterranean. J. Biogeogr. 33 (9): 1559–1565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01525.x
Gosper C.R., Stansbury C.D. & Vivian-Smith G. 2005. Seed dispersal of fleshy-fruited invasive plants by birds: contributing factors and management options. Divers. Distrib. 15 (6): 549–558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00195.x
Gosper C.R. & Vivian-Smith G. 2009. The role of fruit traits of bird-dispersed plants in invasiveness and weed risk assessment. Divers. Distrib. 15 (6): 1037–1046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00599.x
Gray E.R. & van Heezik Y. 2016. Exotic trees can sustain native birds in urban woodlands. Urban Ecosyst. 19 (1): 315–329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-015-0493-1
Hadidian J., Sauer J., Swarth C., Handly P., Droege S., Williams C., Huff J. & Didden G. 1997. A citywide breeding bird survey for Washington, DC. Urban Ecosyst. 1 (2): 87–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018563125184
Hajzlerová L. & Reif J. 2014. Bird species richness and abundance in riparian vegetation invaded by exotic Reynoutria spp. Biologia 69 (2): 247–253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-013-0296-x
Helden A.J., Stamp G.C. & Leather S.R. 2012. Urban biodiversity: comparison of insect assemblages on native and non-native trees. Urban Ecosyst. 15 (3): 611–624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-012-0231-x
Hobbs R.J. 1992. The role of corridors in conservation–solution or bandwagon. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7 (11): 389–392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(92)90010-9
Holland-Clift S., O’Dowd D.J. & Mac Nally R. 2011. Impacts of an invasive willow (Salix × rubens) on riparian bird assemblages in south-eastern Australia. Austral Ecol. 36 (5): 511–520. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2010.02178.x
Holm S. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6 (2): 65–70.
Hostetler M. & Holling C.S. 2000. Detecting the scales at which birds respond to structure in urban landscapes. Urban Ecosyst. 4 (1): 25–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009587719462
Ikin K., Knight E., Lindenmayer D.B., Fischer J. & Manning A.D. 2013. The influence of native versus exotic streetscape vegetation on the spatial distribution of birds in suburbs and reserves. Divers. Distrib. 19 (3): 294–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00937.x
Jokimäki J. 1996. Patterns of bird communities in urban environments. Arctic Centre, University of Lapland, Finland. Arctic Centre Report 16, 31 pp. ISBN: 951-634-489-5, 9789516344891
Jokimäki J. 1999. Occurrence of breeding bird species in urban parks: Effects of park structure and broad-scale variables. Urban Ecosyst. 3 (1): 21–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009505418327
Jokimäki J. & Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M.L. 2003. Spatial similarity of urban bird communities: a multi-scale approach. J. Biogeogr. 30 (8): 1183–1193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00896.x
Jordaan L.A., Johnson S.D. & Downs C.T. 2011. The role of avian frugivores in germination of seeds of fleshy-fruited invasive alien plants. Biol. Invasions. 13 (8): 1917–1930. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0013-z
Jordano P. 2000. Fruits and frugivory, pp. 125–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851994321.0125 In: Fenner E. (eds), Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. CABI, Wallingford, 410 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851994321.0000. ISBN: 0851994326
Keane R.M. & Crawley M.J. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17 (4): 164–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02499-0
Kolar C.S. & Lodge D.M. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 16 (4): 199–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02101-2
Kowarik I. 1995. On the role of alien species in urban flora and vegetation, pp. 85–103. In: Pyšek P., Prach K., Rejmanek M. & Wade M. (eds), Plant Invasions–General Aspects and Special Problems, SPB Academic Publishing, 274 pp. ISBN: 9051030975, 9789051030976
Lambertini M., Leape J., Marton-Lefčvre J., Mittermeier R.A., Rose M., Robinson J.G., Stuart S.N., Waldman B. & Genovesi P. 2011. Invasives: a major conservation threat. Science 333 (6041): 404–405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.333.6041.404-b
Lancaster R.K. & Rees W.E. 1979. Bird communities and the structure of urban habitats. Can. J. Zool. 57 (12): 2358–2368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/z79-307
Lerman S.B., Turner V.K. & Bang C. 2012. Homeowner associations as a vehicle for promoting native urban biodiversity. Ecol. Soc. 17 (4): Art.: 45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05175-170445
Levine J.M. & D’Antonio C.M. 1999. Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87: 15–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3546992
Loram A., Tratalos J., Warren P.H. & Gaston K.J. 2007. Urban domestic gardens (X): the extent and structure of the resource in five major cities. Landsc. Ecol. 22 (4): 601–615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9051-9
Matuszkiewicz J.M., Solon J., Orzechowski M., Kozłowska A., Ró˙zański W., Szczygielski M. & Kowalska A. 2007. Geobotaniczne rozpoznanie tendencji rozwojowych zbiorowisk leśnych w wybranych regionach Polski [Geobotanical identification of the development tendencies in forest associations in the regions of Poland]. IGiPS PAN, Wrocław, 978 pp. ISBN: 9788387954780
MacDougall A.S. & Turkington R. 2005. Are invasive species the drivers or passengers of change in degraded ecosystems? Ecology 86 (1): 42–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0669
Mack M.C. & D’Antonio C.M. 1998. Impacts of biological invasions on disturbance regimes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13 (5): 195–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01286-X
Mack R.N. & Lonsdale W.M. 2001. Humans as global plant dispersers: Getting more than we bargained for. Bioscience 51: 95–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0095:HAGPDG]2.0.CO;2
Mack R.N., Simberloff D., Lonsdale W.M., Evans H., Clout M. & Bazzaz F.A. 2000. Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl. 10 (3): 689–710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0689:BICEGC]2.0.CO;2
Mackenzie J., Hinsley S.A. & Harrison N.H. 2014. Parid foraging choices in urban habitat and their consequences for fitness. Ibis 156 (3): 591–605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12166
McIntyre N.E. 2000. Ecology of urban arthropods: a review and a call to action. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93 (4): 825–835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2000)093[0825:EOUAAR]2.0.CO;2
McKinney M. L. 2006. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol. Conserv. 127 (3): 247–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005
McKinney M.L. 2008. Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst. 11 (2): 161–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-007-0045-4
McKinney M.L. & Lockwood J.L. 1999. Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14 (11): 450–453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01679-1
Mills G.S., Dunning Jr. J.B. & Bates J.M. 1989. Effects of urbanization on breeding bird community structure in southwestern desert habitats. Condor 91 (2): 416–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1368320
Moroń D., Lenda M., Skórka P., Szentgyörgyi H., Settele J. & Woyciechowski M. 2009. Wild pollinator communities are negatively affected by invasion of alien goldenrods in grassland landscapes. Biol. Conserv. 142 (7): 1322–1332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.036
Mörtberg U. & Wallentinus H.-G. 2000. Red-listed forest bird species in an urban environment—assessment of green space corridors. Landsc. Urban Plan. 50 (4): 215–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00090-6
Myczko Ł., Dylewski Ł., Zduniak P., Sparks T.H. & Tryjanowski P. 2014. Predation and dispersal of acorns by European Jay (Garrulus glandarius) differs between a native Pedunculate Oak (Quercus robur) and an introduced oak species (Northern Red Oak Quercus rubra) in Europe. Forest Ecol. Manag. 331: 35–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.07.027
Nowacki G.J., Abrams M.D. & Lorimer C.G. 1990. Composition, structure, and historical development of northern red oak stands along an edaphic gradient in north-central Wisconsin. For. Sci. 36 (2): 276–292.
Paker Y., Yom-Tov Y., Alon-Mozes T. & Barnea A. 2014. The effect of plant richness and urban garden structure on bird species richness, diversity and community structure. Landsc. Urban Plan. 122: 186–195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.10.005
Palmer M.A., Falk D.A. & Zedler J.B. 2006. Ecological Theory and Restoration Ecology, pp. 1–10. In: Falk D.A., Palmer M.A. & Zedler L. (eds), Foundations of Restoration Ecology, Island Press, 364 pp. ISBN: 1-59726-016-9
Palumbi S.R. 2001. Humans as the world’s greatest evolutionary force. Science 293 (5536): 1786–1790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.293.5536.1786
Pyšek P., Jarošik V., Hulme P.E., Pergl J., Hejda M., Schaffner U. & Vilà M. 2012. A global assessment of alien invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment. Global Change Biol. 18 (5): 1725–1737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02636.x
Rejmánek M. & Richardson D.M. 1996. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77 (6): 1655–1661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2265768
Richardson D.M., Allsopp N., D’Antonio C.M., Milton S.J. & Rejmanek M. 2000. Plant invasions–the role of mutualisms. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 75 (1): 65–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1999.tb00041.x
Richardson D.M. & Rejmánek M. 2011. Tees and shrubs as invasive alien species–a global review. Divers. Distrib. 17 (5): 788–809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00782.x
Richardson D.M. & van Wilgen B.W. 2004. Invasive alien plants in South Africa: how well do we understand the ecological impacts? S. Afr. J. Sci. 100 (1): 45–52.
Rottenborn S.C. 1999. Predicting the impacts of urbanization on riparian bird communities. Biol. Conserv. 88 (3): 289–299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00128-1
Sandström U.G., Angelstam P. & Mikusiński G. 2006. Ecological diversity of birds in relation to the structure of urban green space. Landsc. Urban Plan. 77 (1-2): 39–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.01.004
Schirmel J., Bundschuh M., Entling M.H., Kowarik I. & Buchholz S. 2016. Impacts of invasive plants on resident animals across ecosystems, taxa, and feeding types: a global assessment. Glob. Change Biol. 22 (2): 594–603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13093
Shea K. & Chesson P. 2002. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17 (4): 170–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02495-3
Shwartz A., Shirley S. & Kark S. 2008. How do habitat variability and management regime shape the spatial heterogeneity of birds within a large Mediterranean urban park? Landsc. Urban Plan. 84 (3-4): 219–229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.08.003
Skórka P., Lenda M. & Tryjanowski P. 2010. Invasive alien goldenrods negatively affect grassland bird communities in Eastern Europe. Biol. Conserv. 143 (4): 856–861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.12.030
Southwood T.R.E. 1961. The number of species of insect associated with various trees. J. Anim. Ecol. 30 (1): 1–8.
Stachowicz J.J., Whitlatch R.B. & Osman R.W. 1999. Species diversity and invasion resistance in a marine ecosystem. Science 286 (5444): 1577–1579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5444.1577
Thompson K., Austin K.C., Smith R.M., Warren P.H., Angold P.G. & Gaston K.J. 2003. Urban domestic gardens (I): putting small-scale plant diversity in context. J. Veg. Sci. 14 (1): 71–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02129.x
Thompson W.L. White G.C. & Gowan C. 1998. Monitoring Vertebrate Populations. Academic Press, San Diego 365 pp. ISBN: 978-0-12-688960-4
Tokarska-Guzik B., Dajdok Z., Zając M., Zając A., Urbisz A., Danielewicz W. & Hołdyński C. 2012. Rośliny obcego pochodzenia w Polsce ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem gatunków inwazyjnych. [Plants of foreign origin in Poland, with special emphasis on invasive species]. Generalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska, Warszawa, 197 pp. ISBN: 978-83-62940-34-9
Van Driesche R.G. & Bellows T.S. 1996. Biological Control. Chapman & Hall, New York, 539 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1157-7. ISBN: 978-1-4612-8490-1
Vergara-Tabares D.L., Badini J. & Peluc S.I. 2016. Fruiting phenology as a “triggering attribute” of invasion process: Do invasive species take advantage of seed dispersal service provided by native birds? Biol. Invasions 18 (3): 677–687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-015-1039-4
Vilà M., Espinar J.L., Hejda M., Hulme P.E., Jarošik V., Maron J.L., Pergl J., Schaffner U., Sun Y. & Pyšek P. 2011. Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 84 (7): 702–708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x
Vitousek P.M., D’Antonio C.M., Loope L.L. & Westbrooks R. 1996. Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am. Sci. 84 (5): 468–478.
Vitousek P.M. & Mooney H.A. 1997. Human domination of Earth’s ecosystem. Science 277 (5325): 494–499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5325.494
Wilcove D.S., Rothstein D., Dubow J., Phillips A. & Losos E. 1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48 (8): 607–615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1313420
Wagner D.L. & Van Driesche R.G. 2010. Threats posed to rare or endangered insects by invasions of alien species. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55 (1): 547–568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085516
Wood E.M., Pidgeon A.M., Mladenoff D.J. & Liu F. 2012. Birds see the trees inside the forest. The potential impacts of changes in forest composition on songbirds during spring migration. Forest Ecol. Manage. 280: 176–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.05.041
Woziwoda B., Potocki M., Sagan J., Zasada M., Tomasiak R. & Wilczyński S. 2014. Commercial forestry as a vector of alien tree species–the case of Quercus rubra L. introduction in Poland. Baltic Forestry 20 (1): 131–141.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grzędzicka, E., Kowalik, K. & Bacler-ŻZbikowska, B. Does the invasion of Northern Red Oak Quercus rubra in parkland influence the diversity of birds?. Biologia 72, 215–229 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2017-0022
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2017-0022


