Abstract
Genetics and chemicals relatedness among three Euphorbia species (Euphorbia prostrata Aiton, Euphorbia peplus L. and Euphorbia terracina L.) were analysed by RAPD, ISSR markers and GC-MS technique. RAPD profiling pattern revealed that E. peplus and E. terracina in one cluster with similarity value (44.37%) while the lowest value (29.14%) between E. prostrata and E. terracina. ISSR profiling pattern revealed that E. prostrata and E. terracina in one cluster with similarity value (46.75%) and the lowest similarity value (37.87%) between E. prostrata and E. peplus. The sum results of RAPD and ISSR data revealed that E. peplus and E. terracina in one cluster with similarity value (44.69%) while the lowest value (36.88%) between E. prostrata and E. peplus. Sixty-eight chemicals pattern revealed that E. prostrata and E. peplus in one cluster with similarity value (39.71%) while the lowest value (25.0%) between E. prostrata and E. terracina. Super tree (RAPD, ISSR and phytocomponents) revealed that E. peplus and E. terracina in one cluster with similarity value (43.04%) while the lowest value (36.08%) between E. terracina and E. prostrata. In conclusion, biosystematics tools including biomarkers and chemical compounds can be applied to investigate relatedness of Euphorbia species and probably to other plant taxa.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- RAPD:
-
Random amplified polymorphic DNA
- ISSR:
-
Inter-simple sequence repeats markers
- GC-MS:
-
Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
References
Ahmad N., Munir I., Khan I. A. & Ali W. 2007. PCR based genetic diversity of rapeseed germplasm using RAPD markers. Biotechnology 6: 334–338.
Aljibouri A.M., Yakoub Zokian S.A. & Almusawi AH. 2013. RAPD-PCR analysis of some species of Euphorbia grown in University of Baghdad Campus in Jadiriyah. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 12: 6809–6816.
APG II. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 141: 399–436.
APG III. 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 161: 105–121.
Behera T.K., Singh A.K. & Staub J.E. 2008. Comparative analysis of genetic diversity in Indian bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) using RAPD and ISSR markers for developing crop improvement strategies. Sci. Hortic. 115: 209–217.
Bruyns P.V., Mapaya R.J. & Hedderson T. 2006. A new subgeneric classification for Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) in southern Africa based on ITS and psbA-trnH sequence data. Taxon 55: 397–420.
Chowda-Reddy R.V., Kirankumar M., Seal S.E., Muniyappa V., Girish B.V., Govindappa M.R. & John C. 2012. Bemisia tabaci Phylogenetic Groups in India and the Relative Transmission Efficacy of Tomato leaf curl Bangalore virus by an Indigenous and an Exotic Population. J. Integr. Agric. 11: 235–248.
Djamila K., Ammar B. & Med M. 2012. Use of the ISSR markers for the study of genetic polymorphism of the Pistachio fruit Pistacia vera L. in Algeria. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 11: 7354–7360.
Doyle J.J. & Doyle J.L. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19: 11–15.
Ezhilan B.P. & Neelamegam R. 2012. GC-MS analysis of phytocomponents in the ethanol extract of Polygonum chinense L. Pharmacogn. Res. 4: 11–14.
Goodwin I.D., Aitken E.A.B. & Smith L.W. 1997. Application of intersimple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers to plant genetics. Electrophoresis 18: 1524–1528.
Govaerts R., Fordin D. & Radcliffe-Smith A. 2000. World Checklist and Bibliography of Euphorbiaceae. The Royal Botanic Gardens Kew.
Haevermans T. & Labat J.N.L. 2004. A synoptic revision of the Malagasy endemic Euphorbia pervilleana group. Syst. Bot. 29: 118–124.
Harvey M. & Botha F.C. 1996. Use of PCR-based methodologies for the determination of DNA diversity between Saccharum varieties. Euphytica 89: 257–265.
Horn J.W., van Ee B.W., Morawetz J.J., Riina R., Steinmann V.W., Berry P.E. & Wurdack K.J. 2012. Phylogenetics and the evolution of major structural Wurdack characters in the giant genus Euphorbia L. (Euphorbiaceae). Mol. Phylogene. Evol. 63: 305–326.
Manimekalai R., Nagarajan P. & Kumaran P.M. 2006. Comparison of effectiveness of RAPD. ISSR and SSR markers for analysis of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) germplasm accessions. Eighteenth Annual Congress of the PGIA pp. 16–17.
Moustafa M.F.M., Alamri S., Taha T.H. & Alrumman S.A. 2013. In vitro antifungal activity of Argemone ochroleuca sweet latex against some pathogenic fungi. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 12: 1132–1137.
Mukherjee A., Sikdar B., Ghosh B., Banerjee A., Ghosh E., Bhattacharya M. & Roy S.C. 2013. RAPD and ISSR analysis of some economically important species varieties and cultivars of the genus Allium (Alliaceae). Turk. J. Bot. 37: 605–618.
Radcliffe-Smith A. 2001. Drypetes Vahl., pp. 50–52. In: Genera Euphorbiacearum. Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, UK.
Rawashdeh N.Q., Haddad N.I. Al-Ajlouni M.M. & Turk M.A. 2007. Phenotypic diversity of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) from Jordan. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 54: 129–138.
Richard S. & Peter H. 2007. Community Analysis Package 4.0 Searching for structure in community data in Lymington UK.
Park K.R. & Jansen R.K. 2007. A phylogeny of Euphorbieae subtribe Euphorbiinae (Euphorbiaceae) based on molecular data. J. Plant Biol. 50: 644–649.
Paulauskas A., Jodinskienė M., Griciuvienė L ˇZukauskienė., Petraitien Ė E. & Brazauskienė I. 2013. Morphological traits and genetic diversity of differently overwintered oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. ˇZemdirbystė–Agriculture 100: 409–416.
Salgueiro L.R., Vila R., Tomas X., Canigueral S., Paiva J., Proenca da Cunha A. & Adzet T. 2000. Chemotaxonomic study on Thymus villosus fromPortugal. Biochem. Sys. Ecol. 28: 471–482.
Singh A.K., Singh M., Singh A.K., Singh R., Kumar S. & Kalloom G. 2006. Genetic diversity within the genus Solanum (Solanaceae) as revealed by RAPD markers. Curr. Sci. 90: 711–716.
Steinmann V.W. & Porter J.M. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships in Euphorbieae (Euphorbiaceae) based on ITS and ndhF sequence data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 89: 453–490.
Thormann C.E., Ferreira M.E., Camargo L.E.A., Tivang J.G. & Osborn T.C. 1994. Comparison of RFLP and RAPD markers to estimating genetic relationships within and among Cruciferous species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88: 973–80.
Webster G.L. 1994. Synopsis of the genera and suprageneric taxa of Euphorbiaceae. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 81: 33–144.
Weier T.E., Stocking C.R., Barbour M.G. & Rost T.L. 1982. Botany an Introduction to Plant Biology. 6th Ed. John Wiley and Sons New York ISBN: 0-471-86840-X.
Wurdack K.J., Hoffmann P., Samuel R., Bruijn A., Van Der Bank M. & Chase M.W. 2004. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Phyllanthaceae (Phyllanthoideae pro parte Euphorbiaceae s.l.) using plastid rbcl dna sequences. Am. J. Bot. 91: 1882–1900.
Wurdack K.J., Hoffmann P. & Chase M.W. 2005. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of uniovulate Euphorbiaceae (Euphorbiaceae s.s.) using plastid rbcL and trnL-F DNA sequences. Am. J. Bot. 92: 1397–1420.
Zietkiewicz E., Rafalski A. & Labuda D. 1994. Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 20: 176–183.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) for the financial support of this work under grant number (A-I-34-280).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moustafa, M., Mostafa, O., Al-Shahrani, D. et al. An application of genetics-chemicals constituents to the relatedness of three Euphorbia species. Biologia 71, 1240–1249 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2016-0148
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2016-0148