Abstract
Water storage and flow in soils are highly dependent on soil structure, which strongly determines soil porosity. However pore size distribution can be derived from soil water retention curve (SWRC). Structural characteristics of cultivated arable fields (693 soil profiles, 1773 samples) and soils covered by treated forest stands (137 soil profiles, 405 samples) were selected from the MARTHA Hungarian soil physical database, and evaluated for expressing organic matter effects on soil structure and water retention. For this purpose the normalized pore size distribution curves were determined for the selected soils, plus the modal suction (MS) corresponding to the most frequent pore size class of the soil. Skewness of soils’ pore size distribution curves are found different. The quasi-normal distribution of sandy soils are transformed into distorted in clayey soils. A general growing trend of MS with the ever finer soil texture was shown. Sandy soils have the lowest average MS values, i.e. the highest most frequent equivalent pore diameter. Silty clay and clay soil textures are characterized by the highest MS values. A slight effect of land use and organic matter content is also observable in different MS values of soils under forest vegetation (‘forest’) and cultivated arable land (‘plough fields’). MS values of the two land uses were compared statistically. The results of the analyses show that certain soil group’s MS are significantly different under forest vegetation and cultivation. However this difference can be explained only partly and indirectly by the organic matter of different plant coverage in the land use types.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bieganowski A., Ryżak M. & Witkowska-Walczak B. 2010. Determination of soil aggregate disintegration dynamics using laser diffraction. Clay Miner. 45: 23–34.
Bouma J. 1989. Using soil survey data for qualitative land evaluation. Adv. Soil Sci. 9: 177–213.
Bouma J. 1992. Effect of soil structure, tillage, and aggregation upon soil hydraulic properties, pp. 1–36. In: Wagenet R.J., Baveye P. & Stewart B.A. (eds). Interacting Processes in Soil Science. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton.
Canarache A., Dumitru E. & Enache R. 1998. Estimation of soil sensitivity to structure degradation. In. Proc. of the 16th World Congress of Soil Science. Montpellier, Symposium 24, 8 (CD-ROM).
Cresswell H., Mckenzie N. & Paydar Z. 1999. Strategy for determining hydraulic properties of Australian soils using direct measurements and pedotransfer functions, pp. 1143–1160. In: van Genuchten M.T., Leij F. & Wu L. (eds). Proc. Int. Workshop Characterization and Measurement of the Hydraulic Properties of Unsaturated Porous Media. University of California, Riverside, CA.
Dexter A.R. 2004. Soil physical quality. Part I. Theory, effects of soil texture, density, and organic matter, and effects on root growth. Geoderma 120: 201–214.
FA. 1980. Metodología provisional para la evaluación de la degradación de los suelos. FAO/UNEP/UNESCO, Rome, 86 pp.
Gantzer C.J. & Andreson S.H. 2002. Computed tomographic measurement of macroporosity in chisel-disk and no-tillage seedbeds. Soil Till. Res. 64: 101–111.
Ghezzehei T.A. 2012. Soil structure, pp. 2–1.–2–17. In: Huang P.M., Li Y. & Sumner M.E. (eds). Handbook of soil sciences. Properties and processes. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
Ghiberto P. J., Imhoff S., Libardi P.L., da Silva Á.P., Tormena C.A. & Pilatti M.Á. 2015. Soil physical quality of Mollisols quantified by a global index. Sci. Agric. 72: 167–174.
Hamblin A. 1985. The influence of soil structure on water movement, crop root growth, and water uptake. Adv. Agron. 38: 95–158.
Hernádi H. & Makó A. 2014. Preliminary investigation to estimate soil NAPL retention using parametric pedotransfer functions. Int. Agrophysics 28: 435–445.
Hillel D. 1998. Environmental Soil Physics. Academic Press. San Diego, 771 pp.
Kachinsky N.A. 1965. Fizika pochvy. Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow, 323 pp.
Kemper W.D. & Rosenau R.C. 1986. Aggregate stability and size distribution. In A. Klute (ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part I. (2nd Ed.) Agronomy Monograph 9, pp. 425–442.
Lamorski K., Bieganowski A., Ryżak M., Sochan A., Sławi´nski C. & Stelmach W. 2014. Assessment of the usefulness of particle size distribution measured by laser diffraction for soil water retention modelling. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 177: 803–813.
Le Bissonnais Y. 1996. Aggregate stability and assessment of soil crustability and erodibility. I. Theory and methodology. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 47: 425–437.
Lin H.S., McInnes K.J., Wilding I.P. & Hallmark C.T. 1999. Effect of soil morphology on hydraulic properties: II. Hydraulic pedotransfer functions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63: 955–961.
Loveland P. & Webb J. 2003. Is there a critical level of organic matter in the agricultural soils of temperate regions: a review. Soil Till. Res. 70: 1–18.
Makó A., Elek B., Dunai A. & Hernádi H. 2009. Comparison of the NAPL conductivity and air permeability of different soils. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant. 40: 787–799.
Makó A., Tóth B., Hernádi H., Farkas C. & Marth P. 2010. Introduction of the Hungarian Detailed Soil Hydrophysical Database (MARTHA) and its use to test external pedotransfer functions. Agrokem. Talajtan 59: 29–39.
Makó, A. & Tóth, B. 2013. Soil data from Hungary, pp. 50–55. In: Weynants M (ed.). European Hydropedological Data Inventory (EU-HYDI). Publications Office of the European Union. 2013. JRC Technical Reports, Brussels.
Marshall T.J. & Holmes J.W. 1979. Soil Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 345 pp.
MSZ-08. 0205-78. 1979. A talaj fizikai és vízgazdálkodási tulajdonságainak vizsgálata. Hungarian Standard. Budapest.
Norton L.D., Mamedov A. I., Huang C. & Levy G.J. 2006. Soil aggregate stability as affected by long-term tillage and clay mineralogy. Adv. Geoecol. 38: 422–429.
Rawls W.J., Pachepsky Y.A., Ritchie J.C., Sobecki T.M. & Bloodworth H. 2003. Effect of soil organic carbon on soil water retention. Geoderma 116: 61–76.
Reynolds W.D., Drury C.F., Tan C.S., Fox C.A. & Yang X.M. 2009. Use of indicators and pore volume-function characteristics to quantify soil physical quality. Geoderma 152: 252–263.
SSS. 1997. Glossary of Soil Science Terms. Soil Science Society of America, Madison.
Tóth B., Makó A., Guadagnini A. & Tóth G. 2012. Water retention of salt affected soils: quantitative estimation using soil survey information. Arid Land Res. Manag. 26: 103–121.
van Genuchten M.T. 1980. A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44: 892–898.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rajkai, K., Tóth, B., Barna, G. et al. Particle-size and organic matter effects on structure and water retention of soils. Biologia 70, 1456–1461 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2015-0176
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2015-0176