Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of crop residue retention and tillage on water infiltration into a water-repellent soil

  • Published:
Biologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water repellence is a condition in which soils become hydrophobic and do not readily absorb water. The condition causes problems in agricultural production relating to water availability for seed germination and plant growth. In this research we assess the impact of disturbing the soil by a single annual soil tillage (compared with no-till) and crop residue retention (compared with residue removal by burning) on the severity of water repellency, and on water infiltration during and immediately after rainfall, for 5 discrete rainfall events over an 18-month period covering two crop growing seasons. Soil tillage and crop residue removal were associated with decreased severity of water repellency. Despite this, soil tillage resulted in less infiltration of rain water, especially in the crop inter-row spaces, one hour after the commencement of rainfall, and 6 hours after the conclusion of rainfall. Where a single soil tillage was performed, soil in the inter-row spaces absorbed 19–30% of incident rainfall, compared with 58–78% in undisturbed soils. This was observed for a rainfall event 11 months after soil tillage, indicating that soil tillage has a long-lasting impact on pathways of water entry into the soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson W.K. 2009 Closing the gap between actual and potential yield of rainfed wheat. The impacts of environment, management and cultivar. Field Crops Res. 116: 14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann J., Goebel M.-O. & Woche S.K. 2013. Small-scale contact angle mapping on undisturbed soil surfaces. J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 61: 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauters T.W.J., DiCarlo D.A., Steenhuis T.S. & Parlange J.-Y. 1998. Preferential flow in water-repellent sands. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 62. 1185–1190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell P. 2000. Management of water repellency in Australia, and risks associated with preferential flow, pesticide concentration and leaching. J. Hydrol. 231: 384–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco-Canqui H. & Lal R. 2009. Extent of soil water repellency under long-term no-till soils. Geoderma 149: 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker L.W. & Ritsema C.J. 1994. How water moves in a water repellent sandy soil: 1. Potential and actual water repellency. Water Resour. Res. 30. 2507–2517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Peńaloza F.A., Cerdŕ A., Zavala L.M., Jordán A., Giménez-Morera A. & Arcenegui V. 2012. Do conservative agriculture practices increase soil water repellency? A case study in citrus-cropped soils. Soil Tillage Res. 124: 233–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King P.M. 1981. Comparison of methods for measuring severity of water repellence of sandy soils and assessment of some factors that affect its measurement. Austr. J. Soil Res. 19: 275–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichner L., Holko L., Zhukova N., Schacht K., Rajkai K., Fodor N. & Sandor R. 2012. Plants and biological soil crust influence the hydrophysical parameters and water flow in an aeolian sandy soil. J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 60: 309–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales V.L., Parlange J.-Y. & Steenhuis T.S. 2010. Are preferential flow paths perpetuated by microbial activity in the soil matrix. A review. J. Hydrol. 393: 29–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Müller K., Deurer M., Jeyakumar P. Mason K., van den Dijssel C., Green S. & Clothier B. 2014. Temporal dynamics of soil water repellency and its impact on pasture productivity. Agric. Water Manag. 143: 82–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritsema C.J. & Dekker L.W. 1996. Water repellency and its role in forming preferred flow paths in soils. Austr. J. Soil Res. 34: 475–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritsema C.J., Dekker L.W. & Heijs A.W.J.. 1997. Threedimensional fingered flow patterns in a water repellent sandy field soil. Soil Sci. 162: 79–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roper M.M., Ward P.R., Keulen A.F. & Hill J.R. 2013. Under no-tillage and stubble retention, soil water content and crop growth are poorly related to soil water repellency. Soil Tillage Res. 126: 143–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward P.R., Roper M.M., Jongepier R. & Fernandez M.A. 2013. Consistent plant residue removal causes decrease in minimum soil water content in a Mediterranean environment. Biologia 68. 1128–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Stott and Charmaine Redman for access to the land on which we performed the research. Assistance in the field from Elisa Spengler, of the Ravensthorpe Agricultural Initiative Network, and from Angela Keulen (CSIRO), is gratefully acknowledged. This research was funded by CSIRO and the Grains Research and Development Corporation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip R. Ward.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ward, P.R., Roper, M.M., Jongepier, R. et al. Impact of crop residue retention and tillage on water infiltration into a water-repellent soil. Biologia 70, 1480–1484 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2015-0170

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2015-0170

Keywords

Navigation