Advertisement

Biologia

, Volume 72, Issue 2, pp 215–229 | Cite as

Does the invasion of Northern Red Oak Quercus rubra in parkland influence the diversity of birds?

  • Emilia GrzędzickaEmail author
  • Katarzyna Kowalik
  • Barbara Bacler-ŻZbikowska
Section Zoology

Abstract

Invasive plants are non-native, but in most cases naturalised, species that have successfully spread outside of their native range. Aliens invaded all habitats, are competing with native plants, thus, after the direct destruction of habitats, invasions are recognised as the second largest danger for biodiversity. Northern Red Oak is one of the most common invasive tree species dispersed primarily by birds, but new studies have shown that it is also spread continuously in a forest stand. The main aim of our research was to check how strong is the invasion of Northern Red Oak in Silesia Park, where it was introduced together with other alien plant species, and how this invasion interacts with bird diversity. Silesia Park was created 65 years ago on the surface largely ravaged by coal industry. Because many studies indicate birds as vectors of alien plants invasion, we examined the bird fauna in a described area, looking for species that can contribute to spreading oaks. Research showed the diversity of 50 bird species. Surface with a presence of Northern Red Oak was characterised by greater participation of alien plant species than the patch of natural forest, which existed there long before the park creation. The greatest bird diversity was found in the most natural part of Silesia Park, and the lowest in the area of invasion, especially in the case of species classified as “forest birds”. The presence of alien plants increased number of “non-forest” birds, mostly synanthropic species. We also found that Northern Red Oak spreads by spontaneous seed dispersal.

Key words

Silesia Park coal industry alien plants invasion nature conservation biodiversity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adamowski W., Dvorak I. & Ramaniuk I. 2002. Atlas of alien woody species of the Bialowieza Primaeval Forest. Atlas obcych gatunków drzewiastych Puszczy Białowieskiej. Phytocoenosis Supplementum Cartographiae Geobotanicae 14: 1–304.Google Scholar
  2. Angelstam P., Roberge J.-M., Lõhmus A., Bergmanis M., Brazaitis G., Breuss M., Edenius L., Kosinski Z., Kurlavicius P., Larmanis V., Lukins M., Mikusiński G., Racinskis E., Strazds M. & Tryjanowski P. 2004. Habitat modelling as a tool for landscape-scale conservation–a review of parameters for focal forest birds. Ecol. Bull. 51: 427–453. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2307/20113327Google Scholar
  3. Aslan C.E. & Rejmánek M. 2010. Avian use of introduced plants: ornithologist records illuminate interspecific associations and research needs. Ecol. Appl. 20 (4): 1005–1020. PMID: 20597286PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhullar S. & Majer J. 2000. Arthropods on street trees: a food resource for wildlife. Pac. Conserv. Biol. 6 (2): 171–173. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1071/PC000171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bibby C.J., Burgess N.D., Hill D.A. & Mustoe S.H. 2000. Bird Census Techniques. 2nd Edition. Academic Press, London, 302 pp. ISBN: 9780120958313Google Scholar
  6. Blackburn T.M., Pyšek P., Bacher S. Carlton J.T., Duncan R.P., Jarošík V., Wilson J.R.U. & Richardson D.M. 2011. A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26 (7): 333–339. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolger D.T., Scott T.A. & Rotenberry J.T. 2001. Use of corridorlike landscape structures by bird and small mammal species. Biol. Conserv. 102 (2): 213–224. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00028-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brändle M., Kühn I., Klotz S., Belle C. & Brandl R. 2008. Species richness of herbivores on exotic host plants increases with time since introduction of the host. Divers. Distrib. 14 (6): 905–912. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00511.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burghardt K.T., Tallamy D.W. & Shriver W.G. 2009. Impact of native plants on bird and butterfly biodiversity in suburban landscapes. Conserv. Biol. 23 (1): 219–224. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01076.xPubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Byers J.E. 2002 Impact of non-indigenous species on natives enhanced by anthropogenic alteration of selection regimes. Oikos 97 (3): 449–458. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.970316.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chmura D. 2004. Penetration and naturalisation of invasive alien plant species (neophytes) in woodlands of the Silesian Upland (southern Poland). Nat. Conserv. 60: 3–11.Google Scholar
  12. Chmura D. 2013. Impact of alien tree species Quercus rubra L. on understory environment and flora: a study of the Silesian Upland (Southern Poland). Pol. J. Ecol. 61 (3): 431–442.Google Scholar
  13. Clem C.S. & Held D.W. 2015. Species richness of eruciform larvae associated with native and alien plants in the southeastern United States. J. Insect Conserv. 19 (5): 987–997. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-015-9815-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cornelis J. & Hermy M. 2004. Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders. Landsc. Urban Plan 69 (4): 385–401. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crawley M.J., Harvey P.H. & Purvis A. 1996. Comparative ecology of the native and alien floras of the British Isles. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 351 (1345): 1251–1259. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1996.0108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cronk Q.C.B. & Fuller J.L. 1995. Plant Invaders. Chapman & Hall, London, 241 pp. ISBN: 0-412-48380-7Google Scholar
  17. Czech B., Krausman P.R. & Devers P.K. 2000. Economic associations among causes of species endangerment in the United States. BioSci. 50 (7): 593–601. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0593:EAACOS]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davis M.A. & Pelson M. 2001. Experimental support for a resource-based mechanistic model of invasibility. Ecol. Lett. 4 (5): 421–428. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00246.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dawson D.G. & Bull P.C. 1975. Counting birds in New Zealand forests. Notornis 22 (2): 101–109.Google Scholar
  20. Didham R.K., Ewers R.M., Gemmell N.J. 2005. Comment on “Avian extinction and mammalian introductions on oceanic islands”. Science 307 (5714): 1412. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1107333PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Dobson A.P., Bradshaw A.D. & Baker A.J.M. 1997. Hopes for the future: Restoration ecology and conservation biology. Science 277 (5325): 515–522. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5325.515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ehrenfeld J.G. 2003. Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6 (6): 503–523. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-002-0151-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elton C.S. 1958. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. Methuen, London, 181 pp. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7214-9. ISBN: 978-0-412-11430-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fernández-Juricic E. 2000. Bird community composition patterns in urban parks of Madrid: the role of age, size and isolation. Ecol. Res. 15 (4): 373–383. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2000.00358.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fernández-Juricic E. 2004. Spatial and temporal analysis of the distribution of forest specialists in an urban-fragmented landscape (Madrid, Spain). Implications for local and regional bird conservation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 69 (1): 17–32. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gazda A. & Augustynowicz P. 2012. Obce gatunki drzew w Polskich lasach gospodarczych: co wiemy o puli obcych gatunków drzew oraz o rozmieszczeniu wybranych taksonów [Alien tree species in the Polish managed forests. What do we know about ‘alien species pool’ and spatial patterns in the distribution of these trees?]. Studia i Materiały CEPL w Rogowie R 14, 33 (4): 53–61.Google Scholar
  27. Gibbons D.W. & Gregory R.D. 2006. Birds. In: Sutherland W.J. (eds), Ecological Census Techniques: A Handbook, 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 446 pp. ISBN-10: 0521606365Google Scholar
  28. Gilbert O.L. 1989. The Ecology of Urban Habitats. Chapman and Hall, London, 369 pp. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0821-5. ISBN: 978-94-010-6855-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Głowacki D., Sławska M. & Sławski M. 2016. The dynamics of northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) in managed forests of central Poland. Forest Res. Pap. 77 (1): 32–41. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1515/frp-2016-0004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gimeno I., Vilà M. & Hulme P.E. 2006. Are islands more susceptible to plant invasion than continents? A test using Oxalis pes-caprae in the western Mediterranean. J. Biogeogr. 33 (9): 1559–1565. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01525.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gosper C.R., Stansbury C.D. & Vivian-Smith G. 2005. Seed dispersal of fleshy-fruited invasive plants by birds: contributing factors and management options. Divers. Distrib. 15 (6): 549–558. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00195.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gosper C.R. & Vivian-Smith G. 2009. The role of fruit traits of bird-dispersed plants in invasiveness and weed risk assessment. Divers. Distrib. 15 (6): 1037–1046. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00599.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gray E.R. & van Heezik Y. 2016. Exotic trees can sustain native birds in urban woodlands. Urban Ecosyst. 19 (1): 315–329. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-015-0493-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hadidian J., Sauer J., Swarth C., Handly P., Droege S., Williams C., Huff J. & Didden G. 1997. A citywide breeding bird survey for Washington, DC. Urban Ecosyst. 1 (2): 87–102. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018563125184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hajzlerová L. & Reif J. 2014. Bird species richness and abundance in riparian vegetation invaded by exotic Reynoutria spp. Biologia 69 (2): 247–253. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-013-0296-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Helden A.J., Stamp G.C. & Leather S.R. 2012. Urban biodiversity: comparison of insect assemblages on native and non-native trees. Urban Ecosyst. 15 (3): 611–624. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-012-0231-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hobbs R.J. 1992. The role of corridors in conservation–solution or bandwagon. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7 (11): 389–392. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(92)90010-9PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Holland-Clift S., O’Dowd D.J. & Mac Nally R. 2011. Impacts of an invasive willow (Salix × rubens) on riparian bird assemblages in south-eastern Australia. Austral Ecol. 36 (5): 511–520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2010.02178.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Holm S. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6 (2): 65–70.Google Scholar
  40. Hostetler M. & Holling C.S. 2000. Detecting the scales at which birds respond to structure in urban landscapes. Urban Ecosyst. 4 (1): 25–54. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009587719462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ikin K., Knight E., Lindenmayer D.B., Fischer J. & Manning A.D. 2013. The influence of native versus exotic streetscape vegetation on the spatial distribution of birds in suburbs and reserves. Divers. Distrib. 19 (3): 294–306. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00937.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jokimäki J. 1996. Patterns of bird communities in urban environments. Arctic Centre, University of Lapland, Finland. Arctic Centre Report 16, 31 pp. ISBN: 951-634-489-5, 9789516344891Google Scholar
  43. Jokimäki J. 1999. Occurrence of breeding bird species in urban parks: Effects of park structure and broad-scale variables. Urban Ecosyst. 3 (1): 21–34. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009505418327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jokimäki J. & Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M.L. 2003. Spatial similarity of urban bird communities: a multi-scale approach. J. Biogeogr. 30 (8): 1183–1193. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00896.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jordaan L.A., Johnson S.D. & Downs C.T. 2011. The role of avian frugivores in germination of seeds of fleshy-fruited invasive alien plants. Biol. Invasions. 13 (8): 1917–1930. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0013-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jordano P. 2000. Fruits and frugivory, pp. 125–166. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851994321.0125 In: Fenner E. (eds), Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. CABI, Wallingford, 410 pp. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851994321.0000. ISBN: 0851994326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Keane R.M. & Crawley M.J. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17 (4): 164–170. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02499-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kolar C.S. & Lodge D.M. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 16 (4): 199–204. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02101-2PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Kowarik I. 1995. On the role of alien species in urban flora and vegetation, pp. 85–103. In: Pyšek P., Prach K., Rejmanek M. & Wade M. (eds), Plant Invasions–General Aspects and Special Problems, SPB Academic Publishing, 274 pp. ISBN: 9051030975, 9789051030976Google Scholar
  50. Lambertini M., Leape J., Marton-Lefčvre J., Mittermeier R.A., Rose M., Robinson J.G., Stuart S.N., Waldman B. & Genovesi P. 2011. Invasives: a major conservation threat. Science 333 (6041): 404–405. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.333.6041.404-bPubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lancaster R.K. & Rees W.E. 1979. Bird communities and the structure of urban habitats. Can. J. Zool. 57 (12): 2358–2368. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1139/z79-307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lerman S.B., Turner V.K. & Bang C. 2012. Homeowner associations as a vehicle for promoting native urban biodiversity. Ecol. Soc. 17 (4): Art.: 45. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05175-170445
  53. Levine J.M. & D’Antonio C.M. 1999. Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87: 15–26. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2307/3546992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Loram A., Tratalos J., Warren P.H. & Gaston K.J. 2007. Urban domestic gardens (X): the extent and structure of the resource in five major cities. Landsc. Ecol. 22 (4): 601–615. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9051-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Matuszkiewicz J.M., Solon J., Orzechowski M., Kozłowska A., Ró˙zański W., Szczygielski M. & Kowalska A. 2007. Geobotaniczne rozpoznanie tendencji rozwojowych zbiorowisk leśnych w wybranych regionach Polski [Geobotanical identification of the development tendencies in forest associations in the regions of Poland]. IGiPS PAN, Wrocław, 978 pp. ISBN: 9788387954780Google Scholar
  56. MacDougall A.S. & Turkington R. 2005. Are invasive species the drivers or passengers of change in degraded ecosystems? Ecology 86 (1): 42–55. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mack M.C. & D’Antonio C.M. 1998. Impacts of biological invasions on disturbance regimes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13 (5): 195–198. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01286-XPubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Mack R.N. & Lonsdale W.M. 2001. Humans as global plant dispersers: Getting more than we bargained for. Bioscience 51: 95–102. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0095:HAGPDG]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mack R.N., Simberloff D., Lonsdale W.M., Evans H., Clout M. & Bazzaz F.A. 2000. Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl. 10 (3): 689–710. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0689:BICEGC]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mackenzie J., Hinsley S.A. & Harrison N.H. 2014. Parid foraging choices in urban habitat and their consequences for fitness. Ibis 156 (3): 591–605. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. McIntyre N.E. 2000. Ecology of urban arthropods: a review and a call to action. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93 (4): 825–835. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2000)093[0825:EOUAAR]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McKinney M. L. 2006. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol. Conserv. 127 (3): 247–260. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McKinney M.L. 2008. Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst. 11 (2): 161–176. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-007-0045-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. McKinney M.L. & Lockwood J.L. 1999. Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14 (11): 450–453. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01679-1PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Mills G.S., Dunning Jr. J.B. & Bates J.M. 1989. Effects of urbanization on breeding bird community structure in southwestern desert habitats. Condor 91 (2): 416–428. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2307/1368320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Moroń D., Lenda M., Skórka P., Szentgyörgyi H., Settele J. & Woyciechowski M. 2009. Wild pollinator communities are negatively affected by invasion of alien goldenrods in grassland landscapes. Biol. Conserv. 142 (7): 1322–1332. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mörtberg U. & Wallentinus H.-G. 2000. Red-listed forest bird species in an urban environment—assessment of green space corridors. Landsc. Urban Plan. 50 (4): 215–226. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00090-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Myczko Ł., Dylewski Ł., Zduniak P., Sparks T.H. & Tryjanowski P. 2014. Predation and dispersal of acorns by European Jay (Garrulus glandarius) differs between a native Pedunculate Oak (Quercus robur) and an introduced oak species (Northern Red Oak Quercus rubra) in Europe. Forest Ecol. Manag. 331: 35–39. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.07.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Nowacki G.J., Abrams M.D. & Lorimer C.G. 1990. Composition, structure, and historical development of northern red oak stands along an edaphic gradient in north-central Wisconsin. For. Sci. 36 (2): 276–292.Google Scholar
  70. Paker Y., Yom-Tov Y., Alon-Mozes T. & Barnea A. 2014. The effect of plant richness and urban garden structure on bird species richness, diversity and community structure. Landsc. Urban Plan. 122: 186–195. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.10.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Palmer M.A., Falk D.A. & Zedler J.B. 2006. Ecological Theory and Restoration Ecology, pp. 1–10. In: Falk D.A., Palmer M.A. & Zedler L. (eds), Foundations of Restoration Ecology, Island Press, 364 pp. ISBN: 1-59726-016-9Google Scholar
  72. Palumbi S.R. 2001. Humans as the world’s greatest evolutionary force. Science 293 (5536): 1786–1790. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.293.5536.1786PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Pyšek P., Jarošik V., Hulme P.E., Pergl J., Hejda M., Schaffner U. & Vilà M. 2012. A global assessment of alien invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment. Global Change Biol. 18 (5): 1725–1737. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02636.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rejmánek M. & Richardson D.M. 1996. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77 (6): 1655–1661. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2307/2265768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Richardson D.M., Allsopp N., D’Antonio C.M., Milton S.J. & Rejmanek M. 2000. Plant invasions–the role of mutualisms. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 75 (1): 65–93. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1999.tb00041.xPubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Richardson D.M. & Rejmánek M. 2011. Tees and shrubs as invasive alien species–a global review. Divers. Distrib. 17 (5): 788–809. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00782.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Richardson D.M. & van Wilgen B.W. 2004. Invasive alien plants in South Africa: how well do we understand the ecological impacts? S. Afr. J. Sci. 100 (1): 45–52.Google Scholar
  78. Rottenborn S.C. 1999. Predicting the impacts of urbanization on riparian bird communities. Biol. Conserv. 88 (3): 289–299. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00128-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sandström U.G., Angelstam P. & Mikusiński G. 2006. Ecological diversity of birds in relation to the structure of urban green space. Landsc. Urban Plan. 77 (1-2): 39–53. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.01.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schirmel J., Bundschuh M., Entling M.H., Kowarik I. & Buchholz S. 2016. Impacts of invasive plants on resident animals across ecosystems, taxa, and feeding types: a global assessment. Glob. Change Biol. 22 (2): 594–603. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Shea K. & Chesson P. 2002. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17 (4): 170–176. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02495-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Shwartz A., Shirley S. & Kark S. 2008. How do habitat variability and management regime shape the spatial heterogeneity of birds within a large Mediterranean urban park? Landsc. Urban Plan. 84 (3-4): 219–229. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.08.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Skórka P., Lenda M. & Tryjanowski P. 2010. Invasive alien goldenrods negatively affect grassland bird communities in Eastern Europe. Biol. Conserv. 143 (4): 856–861. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.12.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Southwood T.R.E. 1961. The number of species of insect associated with various trees. J. Anim. Ecol. 30 (1): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Stachowicz J.J., Whitlatch R.B. & Osman R.W. 1999. Species diversity and invasion resistance in a marine ecosystem. Science 286 (5444): 1577–1579. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5444.1577PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. Thompson K., Austin K.C., Smith R.M., Warren P.H., Angold P.G. & Gaston K.J. 2003. Urban domestic gardens (I): putting small-scale plant diversity in context. J. Veg. Sci. 14 (1): 71–78. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02129.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Thompson W.L. White G.C. & Gowan C. 1998. Monitoring Vertebrate Populations. Academic Press, San Diego 365 pp. ISBN: 978-0-12-688960-4Google Scholar
  88. Tokarska-Guzik B., Dajdok Z., Zając M., Zając A., Urbisz A., Danielewicz W. & Hołdyński C. 2012. Rośliny obcego pochodzenia w Polsce ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem gatunków inwazyjnych. [Plants of foreign origin in Poland, with special emphasis on invasive species]. Generalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska, Warszawa, 197 pp. ISBN: 978-83-62940-34-9Google Scholar
  89. Van Driesche R.G. & Bellows T.S. 1996. Biological Control. Chapman & Hall, New York, 539 pp. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1157-7. ISBN: 978-1-4612-8490-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Vergara-Tabares D.L., Badini J. & Peluc S.I. 2016. Fruiting phenology as a “triggering attribute” of invasion process: Do invasive species take advantage of seed dispersal service provided by native birds? Biol. Invasions 18 (3): 677–687. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-015-1039-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Vilà M., Espinar J.L., Hejda M., Hulme P.E., Jarošik V., Maron J.L., Pergl J., Schaffner U., Sun Y. & Pyšek P. 2011. Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 84 (7): 702–708. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Vitousek P.M., D’Antonio C.M., Loope L.L. & Westbrooks R. 1996. Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am. Sci. 84 (5): 468–478.Google Scholar
  93. Vitousek P.M. & Mooney H.A. 1997. Human domination of Earth’s ecosystem. Science 277 (5325): 494–499. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5325.494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wilcove D.S., Rothstein D., Dubow J., Phillips A. & Losos E. 1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48 (8): 607–615. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2307/1313420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wagner D.L. & Van Driesche R.G. 2010. Threats posed to rare or endangered insects by invasions of alien species. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55 (1): 547–568. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085516PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  96. Wood E.M., Pidgeon A.M., Mladenoff D.J. & Liu F. 2012. Birds see the trees inside the forest. The potential impacts of changes in forest composition on songbirds during spring migration. Forest Ecol. Manage. 280: 176–186. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.05.041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Woziwoda B., Potocki M., Sagan J., Zasada M., Tomasiak R. & Wilczyński S. 2014. Commercial forestry as a vector of alien tree species–the case of Quercus rubra L. introduction in Poland. Baltic Forestry 20 (1): 131–141.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Slovak Academy of Sciences 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emilia Grzędzicka
    • 1
    Email author
  • Katarzyna Kowalik
    • 2
  • Barbara Bacler-ŻZbikowska
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Nature ConservationPolish Academy of SciencesKrakówPoland
  2. 2.Department of Pharmaceutical Botany, School of Pharmacy with Division of Laboratory Medicine in SosnowiecMedical University of SilesiaSosnowiecPoland

Personalised recommendations