Advertisement

Acta Parasitologica

, Volume 62, Issue 2, pp 336–347 | Cite as

Disruption of egg production by triclabendazole-resistant Fasciola hepatica following treatment with a commercial preparation of myrrh (Mirazid)

  • Mohamed M. O. Abdelaal
  • Gerard P. Brennan
  • Robert E. B. Hanna
  • Ahmed Abdel-Aziz
  • Ian FairweatherEmail author
Article

Abstract

An in vitro study has been carried out to monitor changes to the female reproductive system in adult triclabendazole (TCBZ)-resistant Fasciola hepatica following treatment with a commercial preparation of myrrh (“Mirazid”). Flukes were immersed for 6 h and 24 h in myrrh extract at a concentration of 200 µg/ml, then processed for histological and transmission electron microscope (TEM) examination of the uterus, Mehlis’ gland, ovary and vitellaria. Egg production had become abnormal at 6 h post-treatment (pt), with the uterine lumen being filled with free vitelline cells and masses of shell protein material; few eggs were present. At 24 h pt, no eggs were present. Distinct changes to the ovary and Mehlis’ gland were only observed after 24 h incubation in Mirazid. The ovary contained numbers of apoptotic oogonia and oocytes. In the Mehlis’ gland, the S1 cells were disorganised and the processes from them were vacuolated, although the disruption was not significant. More severe changes were observed in the vitelline cells and follicles. After 6 h incubation in Mirazid, although the gross organisation of the vitelline follicles appeared to be normal, nuclear changes indicative of the early stages of apoptosis were observed in the stem cells and shell protein production by the mature cells had decreased. At 24 h pt, a distinct shift in cell population was evident, with the follicles containing mainly mature cells and spaces were present between the cells. The shell globule clusters in the mature cells were disorganised. In more severely-affected follicles, cells were seen to be breaking down, with karyolytic nuclei and disintegrating cytoplasm. Overall, the results have shown that exposure to Mirazid treatment had a severe impact on egg production by TCBZ-resistant flukes, an effect that was mediated by disruption of the vitelline cells and of the mechanism co-ordinating egg formation in the ootype.

Keywords

Fasciola hepatica liver fluke Mirazid in vitro transmission electron microscopy histology vitellaria ovary uterus Mehlis’ gland egg production 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdelaal, M.M.O., Brennan, G.P., Abdel-Aziz, A., 2016. Fairweather, 2016 changes to the tegumental system and gastrodermal cells of adult Fasciola hepatica following treatment in vivo with a commercial preparation of myrrh (Mirazid). Journal of Helminthology, 91, 1–14. DOI: 10.1017/S0022149X16000705Google Scholar
  2. Abdul-Ghani R.A., Loutfy N., Hassan, A. 2009. Myrrh and tremato-doses in Egypt: An overview of safety, efficacy and effectiveness profiles. Parasitology International, 58, 210–214. DOI: 10.1016/j.parint.2009.04.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abo-Madyan A.A., Morsy T.A., Motawea S.M. 2004a. Efficacy of myrrh in the treatment of schistosomiasis (haematobium and mansoni) in Ezbet-El-Bakly, Tamiya Center, El-Fayoum Gov-ernorate, Egypt. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Para-sitology, 34, 423–426Google Scholar
  4. Abo-Madyan A.A., Morsy T.A., Motawea S.M., Morsy A.T.A. 2004b. Clinical trial of Mirazid in treatment of human fascioliasis, Ezbert El-Bakly (Tamyia Center) Al-Fayoum Governate. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology, 34, 807–818PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Andersson M., Bergendorff O., Shan R., Zygmunt P., Sterner O. 1997. Minor components with smooth muscle relaxing properties from scented myrrh (Commiphora guidotti). Planta Medica, 63, 251–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashrafi K., Bargues M.D., O’Neill S., Mas-Coma S. 2014. Fascioliasis: A worldwide parasitic disease of importance in travel medicine. Travel Medicine and Infectious Diseases, 12, 636–649. DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2014.09.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Badria F., Abou Mohamed G., El-Mowafy A., Massoud A., Salama O. 2001. Mirazid: a new schistosomicidal drug. Pharmaceutical Biology, 93, 127–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Basyoni M.M.A., El-Sabaa A.-A.A. 2013. Therapeutic potential of myrrh and ivermectin against experimental Trichinella spiralis infection in mice. Korean Journal of Parasitology, 51, 297–304. DOI: 10.3347/kjp.2013.51.3.297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Björkman N., Thorsell W. 1964. On the ultrastructure of the ovary of the liver fluke (Fasciola hepatica L.). Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie, 63, 538–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Botros S., William S., Ebeid F., Cioli D., Katz N., Day T.A., Bennett J.L. 2004. Lack of evidence for an antischistosomal activity of myrrh in experimental animals. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 71, 206–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Botros S., Sayed H., El-Dusoki H., Sabry H., Rabie I., El-Ghannan M., et al. 2005. Efficacy of Mirazid in comparison with praziquan-tel in Egyptian Schistosoma mansoni-infected school children and households. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 72, 199–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Botros S., El-Lakkany N.M., Badawy A.A., Mahmoud S.S., Ebeid F.A., Fenwick A. 2009. Mirazid shows insignificant activity against ovine fascioliasis. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, 103, 605–616. DOI: 10.1179/000349809X124 59740922453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chin Y., Balunas M., Chai L. B., Kinghorn D. A. 2006. Drug discovery from natural sources. AAPS Journal, 8, 239–253. DOI: 10.1007/BF02854894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Claeson P., Andersson R., Samuelson G. 1991. T-cadinol — a pharmacologically active constituent of scented myrrh — introductory pharmacological characterization and high-field H-1-NMR and C-13-NMR data. Planta Medica, 57, 352–356. DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-960116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Colhoun L. M., Fairweather I., Brennan G. P. 1998. Observations on the mechanism of eggshell formation in the liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica. Parasitology, 116, 555–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cragg G.M., Newman D.J. 2013. Natural products: A continuing source of novel drug leads. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta — General Subjects, 1830, 3670–3695. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen. 2013.02.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cragg G.M., Grothaus P.G., Newman D.J. 2014. New Horizons for old drugs and drug leads. Journal of Natural Products, 77, 703–723. DOI: 10.1021/np5000796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dawes B. 1966a. Experimental fascioliasis: some effects on Fasciola hepatica of treatment of rat hosts with Bithionol (“Actamer”). Helminthologia, 7, 297–307Google Scholar
  19. Dawes B. 1966b. Some apparent effects of bithionol (“Actamer”) on Fasciola hepatica. Nature, 209, 424–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dawes B. 1967. Experimental fascioliasis in small mammals: apparent effects of bithionol on Fasciola hepatica in rats. Helminthologia, 8, 97–101Google Scholar
  21. Dorny P., Praet N., Deckers N., Gabriel S. 2009. Emerging food-borne parasites. Veterinary Parasitology, 163, 196–206. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.05.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. El Ashry E.S., Rashed N., Salama O.M., Saleh A. 2003. Components, therapeutic value and uses of myrrh. Pharmazie, 8, 163–168Google Scholar
  23. El Malky, M.A., Lu, S.H., El-Beshbishi, S.N., Saudy, N.S., Ohta, N. 2013. Effect of Mirazid in Schistosoma japonicum-infected mice: parasitological and parasitological assessment. Parasitology Research, 112, 373–377. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-012-3145-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fairweather I. 2011. Liver fluke isolates: a question of provenance. Veterinary Parasitology, 176, 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar. 2010.12.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fairweather I., Anderson H. R., Threadgold L. T. 1988. Fasciola he-patica: morphological changes in vitelline cells following treatment In vitro with the deacetylated (amine) metabolite of diamphenethide (DAMD). International Journal for Para-sitology, 18, 1061–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fairweather I., McShane D.D., Shaw L., Ellison S.E., O’Hagan N.T., York E.A., et al. 2012. Development of an egg hatch assay for the diagnosis of triclabendazole resistance in Fasciola hepatica: proof of concept. Veterinary Parasitology, 183, 249–259. DOI: 10.1016/jvetpar.2011.07.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fairweather I., Threadgold L.T., Hanna R.E.B. 1999. Development of Fasciola hepatica in the mammalian host. In: (Ed. J.P. Dalton) Fasciolosis. CAB International Publishing, Oxon, U.K., pp. 47–111Google Scholar
  28. Fathy F.M. 2011. Effect of mirazid (Commiphora molmol) on experimental giardiasis. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Para-sitology, 41, 155–177Google Scholar
  29. Gresson R. A. R. 1964. Electron microscopy of the ovary of Fasciola hepatica. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 105, 213–218Google Scholar
  30. Halferty L., Brennan G.P., Trudgett A., Hoey L., Fairweather I. 2009. Relative activity of triclabendazole metabolites against the liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica. Veterinary Parasitology, 159, 126–138. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.10.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hamed M.A., Hetta M.H. 2005. Efficacy of Citrus reticulata and Mirazid in treatment of Schistosoma mansoni. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 100, 771–778. DOI: 10.1590/S0074-02762005000700017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hammond J.A., Fielding D., Bishop S.C. 1997. Prospects for plant anthelmintics in tropical veterinary medicine. Veterinary Research Communications, 21, 213–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hanna R.E.B. 2015. Fasciola hepatica: histology of the reproductive organs and differential effects of triclabendazole on drug-sensitive and drug-resistant fluke isolates and on flukes from selected field cases. Pathogens, 4, 431–456. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens4030431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hanna R. E. B., Cromie L., Taylor S. M., Couper, A. 2006. The effect of a parenteral ivermectin/closantel injection on the growth and reproductive development of early immature Fasciola hepatica in cattle. Veterinary Parasitology, 142, 78–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.06.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hanna R.E.B., Edgar H., Moffett D., McConnell S., Fairweather I., Brennan G.P., et al. 2008. Fasciola hepatica: histology of the testis in egg-producing adults of several laboratory-maintained isolates of flukes grown to maturity in cattle and sheep and in flukes from naturally infected hosts. Veterinary Parasitology, 157, 222–234. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.07.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hanna R. E. B., Edgar H. W. J., McConnell S., Toner E., McConville M., Brennan G.P., et al. 2010. Fasciola hepatica: histological changes in the reproductive structures of triclabendazole (TCBZ)-sensitive and TCBZ-resistant flukes after treatment in vivo with TCBZ and the related benzimidazole derivative, compound alpha. Veterinary Parasitology, 168, 240–254. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.11.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hanna R.E.B., Scarcella S., Solana H., McConnell S., Fairweather I. 2012. Early onset of changes to the reproductive system of Fasciola hepatica following in vivo treatment with tri-clabendazole. Veterinary Parasitology, 184, 341–347. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.08.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hanna R.E.B., Forster F.I., Brennan G.P., Fairweather I. 2013. Fasciola hepatica: histological demonstration of apoptosis in the reproductive organs of flukes of triclabendazole-sensitive and triclabendazole-resistant isolates, and in field-derived flukes from triclabendazole-treated hosts, using in situ hybridization to visualise endonuclease-generated DNA strand breaks. Veterinary Parasitology, 191, 240–251. DOI: 10.1016/j.vet-par.2012.09.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hanna R.E.B., McMahon C., Ellison S., Edgar H.W., Kajugu P.-E., Gordon A., et al. 2015. Fasciola hepatica: A comparative survey of adult fluke resistance to triclabendazole, nitroxynil and closantel on selected upland and lowland sheep farms in Northern Ireland using faecal egg counting, coproantigen ELISA testing and fluke histology. Veterinary Parasitology, 207, 34–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.11.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Happich F.A., Boray J.C. 1969. Quantitative diagnosis of chronic fasciolosis — 2. The estimation of daily total egg production of Fasciola hepatica and the number of adult flukes in sheep by faecal egg count. Australian Veterinary Journal, 45, 329–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Haridy F.M., El Garhy M.F., Morsy T.A. 2003. Efficacy of Mirazid (Commiphora molmol) against fascioliasis in Egyptian sheep. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology, 33, 917–924PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Haridy F.M., Dawoud H.A., Morsy T.A. 2004. Efficacy of Com-miphora molmol (Mirazid) against sheep naturally infected with monieziasis expansa in Al-Santa Center, Gharbia Governate, Egypt. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology, 34, 775–782PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Haridy F.M., El-Sherbiny G.T., Morsy T.A. 2006. Some parasitic flukes infecting farm animals in Al-Santa Center, Gharbia Governate, Egypt. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology, 36, 259–264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Hassan M., El-Motaiem M., Afify H., Abaza B., El-Shafei M., Mas-soud M.A. 2003. In vitro effect of Mirazid in Schistosoma mansoni worms. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology, 33, 999–1008PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Irwin S.W.B., Threadgold L.T. 1970. Electron-microscope studies on Fasciola hepatica VIII. The development of the vitelline cells. Experimental Parasitology, 28, 399–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Irwin S.W.B., Threadgold L.T. 1972. Electron microscope studies of Fasciola hepatica. X. Egg formation. Experimental Para-sitology, 31, 321–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kayser O., Kiderlen A.F., Croft S.L. 2003. Natural products as an-tiparasitic drugs. Parasitology Research, 90, 55–62. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-002-0768-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Keiser J., Utzinger J. 2005. Emerging foodborne trematodiasis. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 11, 1503–1510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McConville M., Hanna R.E.B., Brennan G.P., Edgar H.W.J., McConnell S., McCoy M., et al. 2012. Impact of compound alpha treatment in vivo on egg production by the liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica. Veterinary Parasitology, 187, 183–195. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.12.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Massoud A., El Sisi S., Salama O., Massoud A. 2001. Preliminary study of the therapeutic efficacy of a new fasciolicidal drug derived from Commiphora molmol (myrrh). American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 65, 96–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Massoud A., El Ebiary F.H., Abou-Gamra M.M., Mohamed, G.F., Shaker S.M. 2004 Evaluation of schistosomicidal activity of myrrh extract: parasitological and histological study. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology, 34, 1051–1076PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Massoud A.M., Shalaby H.A., El Khateeb R.M., Mahmoud M.S., Kutkat, M.A. 2012. Effects of Mirazid and myrrh volatile oil on adult Fasciola gigantica under laboratory conditions. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, 2, 875–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Massoud A.M., Shalaby H.A.M., El Khateeb R.M., Mahmoud M.S., Kurkat M.A.A. 2013. Tegumental histological effects of Mirazid and Myrrh volatile oil on adult Fasciola gigantica. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, 3, 501–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ndjonka D., Rapado L.N., Silber A.M., Liebau E., Wrenger C. 2013. Natural products as a source for treating Neglected Parasitic Diseases. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 14, 3395–3439. DOI: 10.3390/ijms14023395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Newman D.J., Cragg G.M. 2012. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the 30 years from 1981 to 2010. Journal of Natural Products, 75, 311–335. DOI: 10.1021/np200906sCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. O’Neill J.F., Johnston R.C., Halferty L., Hanna R.E.B., Brennan G.P., Fairweather I. 2015. A comparative study on the impact of two artemisinin derivatives, artemether and arte-sunate, on the female reproductive system of Fasciola hepatica. Veterinary Parasitology, 211, 182–194. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.05.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ramzy F., Mahmoud S., William S. 2010. Further assessment of Mi-razid as antischistosomal drug in experimental schistosomia-sis hematobium. Pharmaceutical Biology, 48, 775–779. DOI: 10.3109/13880200903074635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Robinson M.W., Colhoun L.M., Fairweather I., Brennan G.P., Waite J.H. 2001. Development of the vitellaria of the liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica in the rat host. Parasitology, 123, 509–518. DOI: 10.1017/S0031182001008630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sheir Z., Nasr A.A., Massoud A., Salama O., Badra G.A., El-Shennawy H., et al. 2001. A safe, effective, herbal antischistosomal therapy derived from Myrrh. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 65, 700–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shen T., Li G.H., Wang X.N., Lou H.X. 2012. The genus Com-miphora: A review of its traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 142, 319–330. DOI: 10.1016/jep.2012.05.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Skuce P. J., Fairweather I. 1988. Fasciola hepatica: perturbation of secretory activity in the vitelline cells by the sodium ionophore monensin. Experimental Parasitology, 65, 20–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Skuce P. J., Fairweather I. 1990. The effect of the hydrogen ionophore closantel upon the pharmacology and ultrastructure of the adult liver fluke Fasciola hepatica. Parasitology Research, 76, 241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Soliman O.E., El-Arman M., Abdul-Samie E.R., El-Nemer H.I., Massoud A. 2004. Evaluation of myrrh (Mirazid) therapy in fascioliasis and intestinal schistosomiasis in children: im-munological and parasitological study. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology, 34, 941–966PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Stammers B. M. 1975. The effects of rafoxanide and nitroxynil on the survival, growth and morphology of Fasciola hepatica in rabbits. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde, 46, 153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stammers B. M. 1976. The effects of nitroxynil on the survival, growth and morphology of Fasciola hepatica in sheep. Research in Veterinary Science, 20, 174–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stitt A. W., Fairweather I. 1996. Fasciola hepatica: disruption of the vitelline cells in vitro by the sulphoxide metabolite of tri-clabendazole. Parasitology Research, 82, 333–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tagboto S., Townson S. 2001. Antiparasitic properties of medicinal plants and other naturally occurring products. Advances in Parasitology, 50, 198–295Google Scholar
  68. Thorsell, W., Björkman N. 1965. On the fine structure of the Mehlis’ gland cells in the liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica L. Parasitology Research, 26, 63–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Threadgold L. T. 1982. Fasciola hepatica: Stereological analysis of vitelline cell development. Experimental Parasitology, 54, 352–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Threadgold L. T., Irwin S. W. B. 1970. Electron microscope studies of Fasciola hepatica IX. The fine structure of Mehlis’ gland. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde, 35, 16–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Toner E., Brennan G.P., Wells K., McGeown J.G., Fairweather I. 2008. Physiological and morphological effects of genistein against the liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica. Parasitology, 135, 1189–1203. DOI: 10.1017/S0031182008004630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Toner E., Brennan G. P., Hanna R. E. B., Fairweather I. 2011. Disruption of egg formation by Fasciola hepatica following treatment in vivo with triclabendazole in the sheep host. Veterinary Parasitology, 117, 79–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.11.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vissiennon C., Goos K.H., Goos O., Nieber K. 2015. Antispasmodic effects of myrrh due to calcium antagonistic effects in inflamed rat small intestinal preparations. Planta Medica, 81, 116–122. DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1383391CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Witold Stefański Institute of Parasitology, Polish Academy of Sciences 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohamed M. O. Abdelaal
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gerard P. Brennan
    • 2
  • Robert E. B. Hanna
    • 3
  • Ahmed Abdel-Aziz
    • 1
  • Ian Fairweather
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Zoology Department, Faculty of ScienceAl-Azhar UniversityNasr CityEgypt
  2. 2.Parasite Therapeutics Research Group, School of Biological Sciences, Medical Biology CentreThe Queen’s University of BelfastNorthern IrelandUK
  3. 3.Veterinary Sciences DivisionAgri-Food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI)Northern IrelandUK

Personalised recommendations