# Goodwin’s Growth Cycle Model with the Bhaduri-Marglin Accumulation Function

Article

First Online:

- 56 Downloads
- 4 Citations

## Abstract

This paper shows that the incorporation of the Bhaduri-Marglin accumulation function in Goodwin’s growth cycle model is equivalent to the introduction of a sign-variable friction coefficient into the equations of motion. The local dynamic properties of that extended system depend on (i) the form of the accumulation function; and (ii) the elasticity of the economy-wide capital-intensity with respect to the share of profits in total income. It then follows that the equilibrium in the profit-led (wage-led) growth regime is not necessarily locally stable (unstable).

## Keywords

Bhaduri-Marglin accumulation function friction coefficient Goodwin’s growth cycle models Sraffian theory## JEL

B51 C62 E32## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- Andronov, A. A., A. A. Vitt and S. E. Khaikin (1987)
*Theory of Oscillators*, Dover, New York.Google Scholar - Barbosa-Filho, N. H. and L. Taylor (2006) “Distributive and demand cycles in the U.S. economy-a structuralist Goodwin model,”
*Metroeconomica*57.3: 389–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bhaduri, A. (2007) “On the dynamics of profit-led and wage-led growth,”
*Cambridge Journal of Economics*32.1: 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bhaduri, A. and S. Marglin (1990) “Unemployment and the real wage rate: the economic basis for contesting political ideologies,”
*Cambridge Journal of Economics*14.4: 375–393.Google Scholar - Blecker, R. A. (1989) “International competition, income distribution and economic growth,”
*Cambridge Journal of Economics*13.3: 395–412.Google Scholar - Canry, N. (2005) “Wage-led regime, profit-led regime and cycles: a model,”
*Économie Appliquée*58.1: 143–163.Google Scholar - Desai, M., B. Henry, A. Mosley and M. Pemberton (2006) “A clarification of the Goodwin model of the growth cycle,”
*Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control*30.12: 2661–2270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Dutt, A.-K. (1992) “Conflict inflation, distribution, cyclical accumulation and crises,”
*European Journal of Political Economy*8.4: 579–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Flaschel, P., G. Groh, G. Kauermann and T. Teuber (2009) “The classical growth cycle after fifteen years of new observations,” in P. Flaschel and M. Landesmann (eds.)
*Mathematical Economics and the Dynamics of Capitalism*, Routledge, London, pp. 69–77.Google Scholar - Flaschel, P. and S. Luchtenberg (2012)
*Roads to Social Capitalism. Theory, Evidence and Policy*, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Franke, R. (1999) “Technical change and a falling wage share if profits are maintained,”
*Metroeconomica*50.1: 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gandolfo, G. (1997)
*Economic Dynamics*, Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gandolfo, G. (2008) “
*Giuseppe Palomba and the Lotka-Volterra*equations,”*Rendiconti Lincei*19.4: 347–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Goodwin, R. M. (1967) “A growth cycle,” in C.H. Feinstein (ed.)
*Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth: Essays Presented to Maurice Dobb*, Cambridge University Press, London, pp. 54–58.Google Scholar - Goodwin, R. M. (1976) “Use of normalized general co-ordinates in linear value and distribution theory,” in K.R. Polenske and J.V. Skolka (eds)
*Advances in Input-Output Analysis*, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, pp. 581–602.Google Scholar - Goodwin, R. M. (1983) “Capital theory in orthogonalised general co-ordinates,” in R. M. Goodwin (Originally publiched in 1977.) (ed.)
*Essays in Linear Economic Structures*, Macmillan, London, pp. 153–172.Google Scholar - Goodwin, R. M. (1984) “Disaggregating models of fluctuating growth,” in R.M. Goodwin, M. Krüger and A. Vercelli (eds.)
*Nonlinear Models of Fluctuating Growth*, Springer, Berlin, pp. 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Goodwin, R. M. (1986) “Swinging along the turnpike with von Neumann and Sraffa,”
*Cambridge Journal of Economics*10.3: 203–210.Google Scholar - Goodwin, R. M. (1989) “Swinging along the autostrada: cyclical fluctuations along the von Neumann ray,” in M. Dore, S. Chakravarty and R. Goodwin (eds.)
*John von Neumann and Modern Economics*, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 125–140.Google Scholar - Goodwin, R. M. and L. F. Punzo (1987)
*The Dynamics of a Capitalist Economy: A Multi-Sectoral Approach*, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar - Han, Z. and B. Schefold (2006) “An empirical investigation of paradoxes: reswitching and reverse capital deepening in capital theory,”
*Cambridge Journal of Economics*30.5: 737–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hein, E. (2008)
*Money, Distribution Conflict and Capital Accumulation. Contributions to ‘Monetary Analysis’*” Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills.Google Scholar - Hirsch, M. W. and S. Smale (1974)
*Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems and Linear Algebra*, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar - Iliadi, F., T. Mariolis, G. Soklis and L. Tsoulfidis (2012) “Bienenfeld’s approximation of production prices and eigenvalue distribution: further evidence from five European economies,”
*Contributions to Political Economy*, forthcoming.Google Scholar - Kurz, H. D. (1990) “Technical change, growth and distribution: a steady-state approach to ‘unsteady’ growth,” in H.D. Kurz
*Capital, Distribution and Effective Demand. Studies in the ‘Classical’ Approach to Economic Theory*, Polity Press, Cambridge, pp. 211–239.Google Scholar - Kurz, H. D. (1994) “Growth and distribution,”
*Review of Political Economy*6.4: 393–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kurz, H. D. (1995) “The Keynesian project: Tom Asimakopoulos and the ‘other point of view,’” in G.C. Harcourt, A. Roncaglia and R. Rowley (eds.)
*Income and Employment in Theory and Practice: Essays in memory of Athanasios Asimakopoulos*, St. Martin’s Press, New York, pp. 83–110.Google Scholar - Lorenz, H.-W. (1989)
*Nonlinear Dynamical Economics and Chaotic Motion*, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mainwaring, L. (1991) “Review of the paper ‘Bhaduri, A., Marglin, S. (1990): Unemployment and the real wage rate: the economic basis for contesting political ideologies,
*Cambridge Journal of Economics*’,”*European Journal of Political Economy*7.4: 632–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Marglin, S. A. (1984)
*Growth, Distribution and Prices*, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar - Marglin, S. A. and A. Bhaduri (1988) “Profit squeeze and Keynesian theory,” World Institute for Development Economics Research of the United Nations University, Working Paper 39, April 1988.Google Scholar
- Mariolis, T. (2006a)
*Introduction to the Theory of Endogenous Economic Fluctuations. Linear and Nonlinear Economic Oscillators*(in Greek), Typothito, Athens.Google Scholar - Mariolis, T. (2006b) “Distribution and growth in a multi-sector open economy with excess capacity,”
*Economia Internazionale/International Economics*59.1: 51–61.Google Scholar - Mariolis, T. (2007) “Distribution and growth in an economy with heterogeneous capital and excess capacity,”
*Asian-African Journal of Economics and Econometrics*7.1–2: 365–375.Google Scholar - Mariolis, T. and L. Tsoulfidis (2011) “Eigenvalue distribution and the production price-profit rate relationship: theory and empirical evidence,”
*Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review*8.1: 87–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mariolis, T. and L. Tsoulfidis (2013) “On Bródy’s conjecture: theory, facts and figures from the US economy,” Mimeo.Google Scholar
- May, R. M. (1972) “Limit cycles in predator-prey communities,”
*Science*177.4052: 900–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Medio, A. (1992)
*Chaotic Dynamics. Theory and Applications to Economics*, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar - Nikiforos, M. and D. K. Foley (2012) “Distribution and capacity utilization: conceptual issues and empirical evidence,”
*Metroeconomica*63.1: 200–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Panico, C. and N. Salvadori (1993) “Introduction,” in C. Panico and N. Salvadori (eds.)
*Post Keynesian Theory of Growth and Distribution*, Edward Elgar, Aldershot, pp. xiii–xxxi.Google Scholar - Rodousakis, N. (2012) “Goodwin’s Lotka-Volterra model in disaggregative form: a correction note,”
*Metroeconomica*63.4: 599–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Samuelson, P. A. (1971) “Generalized predator-prey oscillations in ecological and economic equilibrium,”
*Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America*68.5: 980–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sasaki, H. (2013) “Cyclical growth in a Goodwin-Kalecki-Marx model,”
*Journal of Economics*108.2: 145–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Schefold, B. (2008a) “Families of strongly curved and of nearly linear wage curves: a contribution to the debate about the surrogate production function,”
*Bulletin of Political Economy*2.1: 1–24.Google Scholar - Schefold, B. (2008b) “Approximate surrogate production functions, Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre,” Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Mimeo (New version (2010) available at: http://host.uniroma3.it/eventi/sraffaconference2010/abstracts/pp_sche-fold.pdf).
- Shaikh, A. (2012) “The empirical linearity of Sraffa’s critical output-capital ratios,” in C. Gehrke, N. Salvadori, I. Steedman and R. Sturn (eds.)
*Classical Political Economy and Modern Theory. Essays in honour of Heinz Kurz*, Routledge, London, pp. 89–101.Google Scholar - Skott, P. (1989) “Effective demand, class struggle and cyclical growth,”
*International Economic Review*30.1: 231–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Skott, P. (2012) “Shortcomings of the Kaleckian investment function,”
*Metroeconomica*63.1: 109–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sordi, S. (2003) “The interaction between growth and cycle in macrodynamic models of the economy,” in N. Salvadori (ed.)
*The Theory of Economic Growth. A ‘Classical’ Perspective*, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 285–305.Google Scholar - Sportelli, M. C. (1995) “A Kolmogoroff generalized predator-prey model of Goodwin’s growth cycle,”
*Journal of Economics*61.1: 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sraffa, P. (1960)
*Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory*, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar - Steedman, I. (1994) “‘Perverse’ behaviour in a ‘one commodity’ model,”
*Cambridge Journal of Economics*18.3: 299–311.Google Scholar - Steenge, A. E. and M. J. P. M. Thissen (2005) “A new matrix theorem: interpretation in terms of internal trade structure and implications for dynamic systems,”
*Journal of Economics*84.1: 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Veneziani, R. and S. Mohun (2006) “Structural stability and Goodwin’s growth cycle,”
*Structural Change and Economic Dynamics*17.4: 437–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Vercelli, A. (1984) “Fluctuations and growth: Keynes, Schumpeter, Marx and the structural instability of capitalism,” in R.M. Goodwin, M. Krüger and A. Vercelli (eds.)
*Nonlinear Models of Fluctuating Growth*, Springer, Berlin, pp. 209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Weber, L. (2005) “A contribution to Goodwin’s growth cycle model from a system dynamics perspective,” http://www.systemdynamics.org/conferences/2005/proceed/papers/WEBER196.pdf.
- You, J.-I. and A. K. Dutt (1996) “Government debt, income distribution and growth,”
*Cambridge Journal of Economics*20.3: 335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

## Copyright information

© Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics 2013