Goodwin’s Growth Cycle Model with the Bhaduri-Marglin Accumulation Function

Article

Abstract

This paper shows that the incorporation of the Bhaduri-Marglin accumulation function in Goodwin’s growth cycle model is equivalent to the introduction of a sign-variable friction coefficient into the equations of motion. The local dynamic properties of that extended system depend on (i) the form of the accumulation function; and (ii) the elasticity of the economy-wide capital-intensity with respect to the share of profits in total income. It then follows that the equilibrium in the profit-led (wage-led) growth regime is not necessarily locally stable (unstable).

Keywords

Bhaduri-Marglin accumulation function friction coefficient Goodwin’s growth cycle models Sraffian theory 

JEL

B51 C62 E32 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andronov, A. A., A. A. Vitt and S. E. Khaikin (1987) Theory of Oscillators, Dover, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Barbosa-Filho, N. H. and L. Taylor (2006) “Distributive and demand cycles in the U.S. economy-a structuralist Goodwin model,” Metroeconomica 57.3: 389–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhaduri, A. (2007) “On the dynamics of profit-led and wage-led growth,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 32.1: 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhaduri, A. and S. Marglin (1990) “Unemployment and the real wage rate: the economic basis for contesting political ideologies,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 14.4: 375–393.Google Scholar
  5. Blecker, R. A. (1989) “International competition, income distribution and economic growth,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 13.3: 395–412.Google Scholar
  6. Canry, N. (2005) “Wage-led regime, profit-led regime and cycles: a model,” Économie Appliquée 58.1: 143–163.Google Scholar
  7. Desai, M., B. Henry, A. Mosley and M. Pemberton (2006) “A clarification of the Goodwin model of the growth cycle,” Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 30.12: 2661–2270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dutt, A.-K. (1992) “Conflict inflation, distribution, cyclical accumulation and crises,” European Journal of Political Economy 8.4: 579–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flaschel, P., G. Groh, G. Kauermann and T. Teuber (2009) “The classical growth cycle after fifteen years of new observations,” in P. Flaschel and M. Landesmann (eds.) Mathematical Economics and the Dynamics of Capitalism, Routledge, London, pp. 69–77.Google Scholar
  10. Flaschel, P. and S. Luchtenberg (2012) Roads to Social Capitalism. Theory, Evidence and Policy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Franke, R. (1999) “Technical change and a falling wage share if profits are maintained,” Metroeconomica 50.1: 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gandolfo, G. (1997) Economic Dynamics, Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gandolfo, G. (2008) “Giuseppe Palomba and the Lotka-Volterra equations,” Rendiconti Lincei 19.4: 347–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goodwin, R. M. (1967) “A growth cycle,” in C.H. Feinstein (ed.) Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth: Essays Presented to Maurice Dobb, Cambridge University Press, London, pp. 54–58.Google Scholar
  15. Goodwin, R. M. (1976) “Use of normalized general co-ordinates in linear value and distribution theory,” in K.R. Polenske and J.V. Skolka (eds) Advances in Input-Output Analysis, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, pp. 581–602.Google Scholar
  16. Goodwin, R. M. (1983) “Capital theory in orthogonalised general co-ordinates,” in R. M. Goodwin (Originally publiched in 1977.) (ed.) Essays in Linear Economic Structures, Macmillan, London, pp. 153–172.Google Scholar
  17. Goodwin, R. M. (1984) “Disaggregating models of fluctuating growth,” in R.M. Goodwin, M. Krüger and A. Vercelli (eds.) Nonlinear Models of Fluctuating Growth, Springer, Berlin, pp. 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goodwin, R. M. (1986) “Swinging along the turnpike with von Neumann and Sraffa,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 10.3: 203–210.Google Scholar
  19. Goodwin, R. M. (1989) “Swinging along the autostrada: cyclical fluctuations along the von Neumann ray,” in M. Dore, S. Chakravarty and R. Goodwin (eds.) John von Neumann and Modern Economics, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 125–140.Google Scholar
  20. Goodwin, R. M. and L. F. Punzo (1987) The Dynamics of a Capitalist Economy: A Multi-Sectoral Approach, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  21. Han, Z. and B. Schefold (2006) “An empirical investigation of paradoxes: reswitching and reverse capital deepening in capital theory,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 30.5: 737–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hein, E. (2008) Money, Distribution Conflict and Capital Accumulation. Contributions to ‘Monetary Analysis’” Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills.Google Scholar
  23. Hirsch, M. W. and S. Smale (1974) Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems and Linear Algebra, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Iliadi, F., T. Mariolis, G. Soklis and L. Tsoulfidis (2012) “Bienenfeld’s approximation of production prices and eigenvalue distribution: further evidence from five European economies,” Contributions to Political Economy, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  25. Kurz, H. D. (1990) “Technical change, growth and distribution: a steady-state approach to ‘unsteady’ growth,” in H.D. Kurz Capital, Distribution and Effective Demand. Studies in the ‘Classical’ Approach to Economic Theory, Polity Press, Cambridge, pp. 211–239.Google Scholar
  26. Kurz, H. D. (1994) “Growth and distribution,” Review of Political Economy 6.4: 393–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kurz, H. D. (1995) “The Keynesian project: Tom Asimakopoulos and the ‘other point of view,’” in G.C. Harcourt, A. Roncaglia and R. Rowley (eds.) Income and Employment in Theory and Practice: Essays in memory of Athanasios Asimakopoulos, St. Martin’s Press, New York, pp. 83–110.Google Scholar
  28. Lorenz, H.-W. (1989) Nonlinear Dynamical Economics and Chaotic Motion, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mainwaring, L. (1991) “Review of the paper ‘Bhaduri, A., Marglin, S. (1990): Unemployment and the real wage rate: the economic basis for contesting political ideologies, Cambridge Journal of Economics’,” European Journal of Political Economy 7.4: 632–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marglin, S. A. (1984) Growth, Distribution and Prices, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  31. Marglin, S. A. and A. Bhaduri (1988) “Profit squeeze and Keynesian theory,” World Institute for Development Economics Research of the United Nations University, Working Paper 39, April 1988.Google Scholar
  32. Mariolis, T. (2006a) Introduction to the Theory of Endogenous Economic Fluctuations. Linear and Nonlinear Economic Oscillators (in Greek), Typothito, Athens.Google Scholar
  33. Mariolis, T. (2006b) “Distribution and growth in a multi-sector open economy with excess capacity,” Economia Internazionale/International Economics 59.1: 51–61.Google Scholar
  34. Mariolis, T. (2007) “Distribution and growth in an economy with heterogeneous capital and excess capacity,” Asian-African Journal of Economics and Econometrics 7.1–2: 365–375.Google Scholar
  35. Mariolis, T. and L. Tsoulfidis (2011) “Eigenvalue distribution and the production price-profit rate relationship: theory and empirical evidence,” Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review 8.1: 87–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mariolis, T. and L. Tsoulfidis (2013) “On Bródy’s conjecture: theory, facts and figures from the US economy,” Mimeo.Google Scholar
  37. May, R. M. (1972) “Limit cycles in predator-prey communities,” Science 177.4052: 900–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Medio, A. (1992) Chaotic Dynamics. Theory and Applications to Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  39. Nikiforos, M. and D. K. Foley (2012) “Distribution and capacity utilization: conceptual issues and empirical evidence,” Metroeconomica 63.1: 200–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Panico, C. and N. Salvadori (1993) “Introduction,” in C. Panico and N. Salvadori (eds.) Post Keynesian Theory of Growth and Distribution, Edward Elgar, Aldershot, pp. xiii–xxxi.Google Scholar
  41. Rodousakis, N. (2012) “Goodwin’s Lotka-Volterra model in disaggregative form: a correction note,” Metroeconomica 63.4: 599–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Samuelson, P. A. (1971) “Generalized predator-prey oscillations in ecological and economic equilibrium,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 68.5: 980–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sasaki, H. (2013) “Cyclical growth in a Goodwin-Kalecki-Marx model,” Journal of Economics 108.2: 145–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schefold, B. (2008a) “Families of strongly curved and of nearly linear wage curves: a contribution to the debate about the surrogate production function,” Bulletin of Political Economy 2.1: 1–24.Google Scholar
  45. Schefold, B. (2008b) “Approximate surrogate production functions, Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre,” Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Mimeo (New version (2010) available at: http://host.uniroma3.it/eventi/sraffaconference2010/abstracts/pp_sche-fold.pdf).
  46. Shaikh, A. (2012) “The empirical linearity of Sraffa’s critical output-capital ratios,” in C. Gehrke, N. Salvadori, I. Steedman and R. Sturn (eds.) Classical Political Economy and Modern Theory. Essays in honour of Heinz Kurz, Routledge, London, pp. 89–101.Google Scholar
  47. Skott, P. (1989) “Effective demand, class struggle and cyclical growth,” International Economic Review 30.1: 231–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Skott, P. (2012) “Shortcomings of the Kaleckian investment function,” Metroeconomica 63.1: 109–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sordi, S. (2003) “The interaction between growth and cycle in macrodynamic models of the economy,” in N. Salvadori (ed.) The Theory of Economic Growth. A ‘Classical’ Perspective, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 285–305.Google Scholar
  50. Sportelli, M. C. (1995) “A Kolmogoroff generalized predator-prey model of Goodwin’s growth cycle,” Journal of Economics 61.1: 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sraffa, P. (1960) Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  52. Steedman, I. (1994) “‘Perverse’ behaviour in a ‘one commodity’ model,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 18.3: 299–311.Google Scholar
  53. Steenge, A. E. and M. J. P. M. Thissen (2005) “A new matrix theorem: interpretation in terms of internal trade structure and implications for dynamic systems,” Journal of Economics 84.1: 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Veneziani, R. and S. Mohun (2006) “Structural stability and Goodwin’s growth cycle,” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 17.4: 437–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vercelli, A. (1984) “Fluctuations and growth: Keynes, Schumpeter, Marx and the structural instability of capitalism,” in R.M. Goodwin, M. Krüger and A. Vercelli (eds.) Nonlinear Models of Fluctuating Growth, Springer, Berlin, pp. 209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weber, L. (2005) “A contribution to Goodwin’s growth cycle model from a system dynamics perspective,” http://www.systemdynamics.org/conferences/2005/proceed/papers/WEBER196.pdf.
  57. You, J.-I. and A. K. Dutt (1996) “Government debt, income distribution and growth,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 20.3: 335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public AdministrationPanteion UniversityAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations