Skip to main content
Log in

Scope and Limits of Predictions by Social Dynamic Models: Crisis, Innovation, Decision Making

  • Article
  • Published:
Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Models of social dynamics grew up from methods used on the physical and life sciences. Different types of growth processes, among others those which lead to finite time singularities are reviewed. The scope and limits of the analogy between neurological disorders (such as epilepsy) and financial crises are analyzed by exploiting the concept of dynamical diseases. Governing rules of social dynamics phenomena can be extracted from collected empirical data, and they have some predictive power. Data for evolving patent citation networks, and annual budget changes are analyzed for generating dynamical models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albeverio, S., V. Jentsch and H. Kantz (eds) (2006) Extreme Events in Nature and Society, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aradi, I. and P. Érdi (2006) “Computational neuropharmacology: dynamical approaches in drug discovery,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 27: 240–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aruka, Y. (2007) “The Evolution of Moral Science: Economic Rationality in the Complex Social System,” Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review 4: 217–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belair, J., L. Glass, U. An der Heiden and J. Milton (1995) “Dynamical disease: Identification, temporal aspects and treatment strategies of human illness,” Chaos 5: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ari, Y., V. Crepel and A. Represa (2008) “Seizures beget seizures in temporal lobe epilepsies: the boomerang effects of newly formed aberrant kainatergic synapses,” Epilepsy Curr 3: 68–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckmaster, P. S. and K. Thind (2005) “Quantifying routes of positive-feedback among granule cells in a model of temporal lobe epilepsy,” Epilepsia, 46: 91–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csárdi, G., K. J. Strandburg, L. Zalányi, J. Tobochnik and P. Erdi (2007) “Modeling innovation by a kinetic description of the patent citation system,” Physica A: Statistical and Theoretical Physics 374: 1-2, 783–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csárdi, G., K. J. Strandburg, J. Tobochnik and P. Erdi (2009) “The inverse problem of evolving networks—with application to social nets,” in B. Bollobás, R. Kozma and D. F. Miklós (eds) Handbook of Large-Scale Random Networks, Springer-Verlag.

  • Einstein, A. (1927) Isasc Newton. Smithonian Annual Report.

  • Erdi, P. (2007) Complexity Explained. Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fergusson, N. (2009) http://www.nybooks.com/articles/22756

  • Gowers, W. R. (1881) Epilepsy and Other Chronic Convulsive Disorders: Their Causes, Symptoms and Treatment. London: J&A Churchill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ionov, D. (2009) “Self-reinforcing loop mechanism in epilepsy,” Medical Hypotheses 73: 608–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. D. (2001) Politics and the Architecture of Choice. University of Chicago Press.

  • Jones, B. D. and F. R. Baumgartner (2005) The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems University of Chicago Press.

  • Jones, B. D., L. Zalányi, F. Baumgartner and P. Erdi (2009) “Dynamic Threshold Modeling of Budget Changes,” Proceedings of AAAI Fall Symposium; Complex Adaptive Systems and the Threshold Effect: Views from the Natural and Social Sciences, AAA Press, pp. 61–66.

  • Helbing, D. (1995) Quantitative Sociodynamics. Stochastic Methods and Models of Social Interaction Processes, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., G. Ouyang, X. Yao and X. Guan (2004) “Dynamical characteristics of pre-epileptic seizures in rats with recurrence quantification analysis,” Physics Letters A 333: 164–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, D., Z. Pang and Z. Wang (2009) “Epileptic seizure prediction by a system of particle filter associated with a neural network,” EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing.

  • Mainzer, K. (2009) “Challenges of Complexity in the 21st Century,” Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review 6: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montroll, E. W. (1978) “Social Dynamics and the Quantifying Forces,” Proceedings of National Academy Science USA 75: 4633–4636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, J. F. (1980) “Bounded rationality in budgetary research,” American Political Science Review 74: 354–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palla, G., A.-L. Barabási and T. Vicsek (2007) “Quantifying social group evolution,” Nature 446: 7136, 664–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigo, J.-M., G. Hans et al. (2002) “The anti-epileptic drug levetiracetam reverses the inhibition by negative allosteric modulators of neuronal GABA- and glycine-gated currents,” British Journal of Pharmacology 36: 659–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, J. B., Jr. (2006) “Complex dynamics and post Keynesian economics,” in M. Setterfield (ed) Complexity, Endogenous Money and Macroeconomic Theory: Essays in Honour of Basil J. Moore, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutala, T. (2004) “Mechanisms of epilepsy progression: current theories and perspectives from neuroplasticity in adulthood and development,” Epilepsy Research 60: 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soltesz, I. and K. Staley (2008) Computational Neuroscience in Epilepsy, Elsevier.

  • Sornette, D. (2002) “Predictability of catastrophic events: Material rupture, earthquakes, turbulence, financial crashes, and human birth,” Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences USA.

  • Sornette, D. (2003) Why Stock Markets Crash: Critical Events in Complex Financial Systems, Princetion University Press.

  • Sperling, W., S. Bleich and U. Reulbach (2008) “Black Monday on stock markets throughout the world—A new phenomenon of collective panic disorder? A psychiatric approach,” Medical Hypotheses 71.6: 972–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, W., T. Biermann and J. Maler (2009) “Global panic reaction—A therapeutic approach to a world-wide economic crisis,” Medical Hypotheses 73.2: 167–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleb, N. (2005) Mandelbrot Makes Sense: A Book Review Essay. http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/mandelbrotandhudson.pdf (March 15th, 2010)

  • Soros, G. (1988) The Alchemy of Finance: Reading the mind of the market, Simon and Schuster.

  • Weidlich, W. (2002) Sociodynamics: A Systematic Approach to Mathematical Modelling in the Social Sciences.

  • Weidlich, W. (2006) “Intentions and Principles of Sociodynamics,” Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review 2: 161–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. (1948) Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, MIT Press. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Péter Érdi.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Érdi, P. Scope and Limits of Predictions by Social Dynamic Models: Crisis, Innovation, Decision Making. Evolut Inst Econ Rev 7, 21–42 (2010). https://doi.org/10.14441/eier.7.21

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14441/eier.7.21

Keywords

JEL

Navigation