Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Evolutionary Perspective on the Management of Stability and Change

  • Article
  • Published:
Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we argue that the trade off between stability and change in social and cultural systems can be linked to systemic theories of ecology and evolutionary change. The growing uncertainty in our globalizing environment requires increased organizational flexibility and the ability to adapt. We argue that economics and business can learn from ecology and evolutionary theories in this domain. To do so, we briefly introduce some essential perspectives from biological evolution, sociology and social psychology, innovation and globalization with respect to management issues. Subsequently, we discuss the implications for management and derive suggestions for the strategic management of international businesses in the area of cultural systems and innovation. We argue that managers need to consider the trade-off between homogenization aiming at the realization of economies of scale and scope and differentiation and various needs for integration by different sets of customers. As a result, we sketch a framework of thought that increases their ability to steer their companies through global social change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, H. (1960) “Nationalökonomie als Soziologie. Zur sozialwissenschaftlichen Integrationsproblematik” (in German), Kyklos 13: 1–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A. (1950) “Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory,” Journal of Political Economy 58: 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, K. A. (1999) Growing and Managing an Entrepreneurial Business, Houghton, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. B. (1999) “The end of economic certainty,” in J. H. Clippinger (ed) The Biology of Business - Decoding the Natural Laws of Enterprise, San Francisco, pp. 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battini, D., A. Persona and S. Allesina (2007) “Towards a Use of Network Analysis: Quantifying the Complexity of Supply Chain Networks,” International Journal of Customer Relationship Management 1: 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckenbach, F. (2002) “Ressourcengewinnung und Marktkoordination in einem Multi-Agenten System” (in German), in M. Lehmann-Waffenschmidt (ed) Studien zur Evolutorischen ökonomik VI. Ein Diskurs zu Analysemethoden der Evolutorischen Ökonomik, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, pp. 19–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, R. (1998) Unternehmungen im Wandel (in German), Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. L. and K. M. Eisenhardt (1998) Competing on the Edge, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T. R. and T. Dietz (1998a) “Kulturelle Evolution. Institutionen, Selektion und menschliches Handeln” (in 7erman), in H.-P. Müller and M. Schmid (eds) Sozialer Wandel. Modellbildung und theoretische Ansätze, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, pp. 340–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • - (1998b) “Cultural evolution: social rule systems, selection and human agenc,” International Sociology 7: 259–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1965) “Blind Variation and Selective Retention in Creative Thought as in other Knowledge Processes,” Psychological Review 67: 380–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. and D. Levinthal (1990) “Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D,” The Economic Journal 99: 569–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, M. (1975) “Analyzing Ecosystem Adaptability,” Mathematical Biosciences 27: 213–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corning, P. A. (1998) “The Synergism Hypothesis. On the Concept of Synergy and It’s Role in the Evolution of Complex Systems,” Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems 21: 133–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crutchfield, J. P. (2001) “When Evolution is Revolution—Origins of Innovation,” in J. P. Crutchfield and P. Schuster (eds) Evolutionary Dynamics—Exploring the Interplay of Selection, Neutrality, Accident and Function, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 101–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni, R., K. Harrigan and R. Gunther (1995) Hypercompetitive rivalries—Competing in highly dynamic environments, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni, R. A. (1994) Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Manoeuvering, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • - (1999) “Strategic Supremacy through Disruption and Dominance,” Sloan Management Review 40: 127–135.

  • Daft, R. L. and K. E. Weick (1984) “Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems,” Academy of Management Review 9: 284–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P. A. (1994) “Why are Institutions the ‘Carriers of History’?: Path Dependence and the Evolution of Conventions, Organizations and Institutions,” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 5: 205–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellyard, P. (2001) “Imagining the future and getting to it first,” in A. I. O. Management (ed) Innovation and imagination at work, McGraw-Hill, Sydney, pp. 152–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, M. (2005) Erfolgsfaktor Selbstverpflichtung In vertrauensbasierten Kooperationen (in German), Peter Lang, Vienna/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • - and S. Kraus (2007) “Mutual Trust as a Key to Internationalization of SMEs,” Management Research News 30: 674–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1953) The Methodology of Positive Economics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, N. (2007) “Myrdal’s Theory of Cumulative Causation,” Evolutionary and Institutional Economic Review 3: 275–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, C. J. G. (1991) “Revolutionary Change Theories: A Multilevel Exploration of the Punctuated Equilibrium Paradigm,” Academy of Management Journal 16: 10–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gharajedaghi, J. (1999) Systems Thinking. Managing Chaos and Complexity, Butterworth Heinemann, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. and N. Eldregde (1977) “Punctuated Equilibria: The Tempo and Mode of Evolution Reconsidered,” Paleobiology 3: 115–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., K. G. Smith and C. E. Shalley (2006) “The interplay between exploration and exploitation,” Academy of Management Journal 49: 693–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. and C. K. Prahalad (1994) Competing for the Future, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M. and J. Champy (1993) Reengineering the Corporation—A Manifesto for Business Revolution, Harper Business, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, R., S. Kraus and C. H. Reschke (2007) “Configurations of new ventures in entrepreneurship research-Contributions and research gaps,” Management Research News 30: 661–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • - E. Schwarz (2009) “The suitability of the configuration approach entrepreneurship research,” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 20 (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1945) “The use of knowledge in society,” The American Economic Review 35: 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Z.-L. and P.-K. Wong (2004) “Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis,” Organization Science 15: 481–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, W. (1997) Strategisches Management. Die Geplante Evolution von Unternehmungen (in German), Kirsch, Münich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1973) Competition and entrepreneurship, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, S. and C. H. Reschke (2004) Evolutionäres Strategisches Management von Gründungsunternehmen (in German), Eul, Lohmar/Cologne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger, W. (2000) Excellence in Change. Wege zur Strategischen Erneuerung (in German), Gabler, Wiesbaden.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F. and R. M. Hodgetts (2004) “Innovation and the entrepreneur,” in D. F. Kuratko and R. M. Hodgetts (eds) Entrepreneurship, Thomson, Mason, pp. 138–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo, E. (1992) Evolutionäres Management Globale Handlungskonzepte (in German), Paidia, Fulda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1951) Field Theory in Social Science (in German), New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • List, F. (1841) Das nationale System der politischen ökonomie (in German), Cotta, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lietaer, B. and S. Brunnhuber (2005) “Economics as an Evolutionary System—Psychological Development and Economic Behavior,” Evolutionary and Instititutional Economic Review 2: 113–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1990) Essays on Self-Reference, Columbia University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • - (1995) Social Systems, Stanford, Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, F., R. R. Nelson, L. Orsenigo and S. Winter (1999) “History-friendly Models of Industry Evolution: The ComputerIndustry,” Industrial and Corporate Change 8: 3–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik, F. (1993) Systemisches Management, Evolution, Selbstorganisation. Grundprobleme, Funktionsmechanismen und Lösungsansätze für komplexe Systeme (in German), Haupt, Bern u.a.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. and H. A. Simon (1958) Organizations, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGahan, A. M. (2000) “How Industries Evolve,” Business Strategy Review 11: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts (1992) Economics, Organization and Management, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. and P. H. Friesen (1980) “Momentum and Revolution in Organizational Adaptation,” Academy of Management Journal 23: 591–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. F. (2000) The Mating Mind. How Sexual Selection Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature, Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H. and D. F. Kuratko (2002) “Creativity and the corporate entrepreneur,” Corporate Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Development within Organizations, Hartcourt, Orlando, FL, pp. 103–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. (1994) “The Co-evolution of Technology, Industrial Structure, and Supporting Institutions,” Industrial and Corporate Change 3: 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • - S. G. WinterU (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J. (1945) “A Model of General Economic Equilibrium,” Review of Economic Studies 13: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishibe, M. and H. Uemura (2005) “The Socio-economics of Institutions and Evolution,” Evolutionary and Institutional Economic Review 2: 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, CUP, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1968 [1937]) The Structure of Social Action, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T. (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T. (1952) “Biological Analogies in the Theory of the Firm,” American Economic Review 42: 804–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pistorius, C. W. I. and J. M. Utterback (1997) “Multimode Interaction among Technologies,” Research Policy 26: 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1980) Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • - (1985) Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W. and P. J. DiMaggio (1991) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reschke, C. H. (2005) Evolutionary Processes in Economics. The Example of Strategy and Research in the Bio-Pharmaceutical Industry, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten/Herdecke.

    Google Scholar 

  • - S. Kraus (2005) “An evolutionary approach to innovation and strategy in small and medium-sized enterprises,” in M. Rebernik, M. Mulej, M. Rus and T. Kro§lin (eds) Shaping the Environment for Innovation Transfer, IRP, Maribor, pp. 175–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • - (2008) “Strategy, Innovation and Entrepreneurship—An Evolutionary Learning Perspective,” in H. Hanappi and W. Elsner (eds) Advances In Evolutionary Institutional Economics-Evolutionary Mechanisms, Non-Knowledge and Strategy, Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, Cheltenham, pp. 189–216.

  • - R. Harms and M. Fink (2006) Business Innovation between Globalization and Social Differentiation, Proceedings of the Management International Conference (MIC) 2006-7th International Conference of the Faculty of Management Koper, Portoro? (SLO), November 23-2, 2006.

  • Riedl, R. (1978) Order in Living Organisms: A Systems Analysis of Evolution, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • - (2000) Strukturen der Komplexität. Eine Morphologie des Erkennens und Erklärens (in German), Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaper, M. and T. Volery (2004) Entrepreneurship and Small Business: A Pacific Rim perspective, Wiley, Milton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlicht, E. (1997) “Patterned Variation: The Role of Psychological Dispositions in Social and Institutional Evolution,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 153: 722–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, G. (2000) “Funktionswandel im Management—Problemaufriß und Thesen (in German),” in G. Schreyögg (ed) Funktionswandel im Management—Wege jenseits der Ordnung, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, pp. 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1993 [1934]) The Theory of Economic Development, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1989 [1890]) “Über sociale Differenzierung. Sociologische und psychologische Untersuchungen” (in German), in G. Simmel (ed) Georg Simmel Gesamtausgabe Vol. 2, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, pp. 109–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. K. and M. L. Tushman (2005) “Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovations Streams,” Organization Science 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D. (1993) Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics, Pitman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standish, R. K. (1999) “Econolab” Complexity International 6 [http://www.journal-ci.csse.monash.edu.au]

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbrecher, M. (1990) Systemisch-evolutionäres Management. Von der Notwendigkeit ganzheitlichen Denkens und Handelns (in German), Forschungsinst. Berlin d. Daimler-Benz AG, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, R. (1975) “Catastrophe Theory: Its Present State and Future Perspectives,” in A. Manning (ed) Dynamical Systems-Warwick 1974—Lecture Notes in Mathematics No. 468, Springer, Berlin, pp. 366–389.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz, R. E. (2000 [1986]) Growth and Development—Ecosystems Pehnomenology, iUniverse, San José.

    Google Scholar 

  • - (2000b) “Toward Quantifying Semiotic Agencies: Habits Arising,” SEED Journal 2: 38–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • - (2004) “On the Nature of Ecodynamics,” Ecological Complexity 1: 341–354.

  • Ulrich, D. (1997) Human Resource Champions: The Next Agenda for Adding Value and Delivering Results, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (1898) “Why is economics not an evolutionary science?,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 12: 373–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volberda, H. W. and A. Y. Lewin (2003) “Co-evolutionary dynamics within and between firms: from evolution to co-evolution,” Journal of Management Studies 40: 2105–2130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S. G. (1965) “Economic natural selection and the theory of the firm,” Yale Economic Essays: 225–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, U. (1987) Individualistische Grundlagen der evolutorischen ökonomik (in German), Mohr, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacharias, C. (1998) Dynamische Unternehmensarchitektur. Ein Ansatz zur Führung flexibler Strukturen im Zeitwettbewerb (in German), Eul, Lohmar/Cologne.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Management Research Cologne, Mainzer Str. 80, D-50678, Cologne, Germany

    Carl Henning Reschke

  2. University of Liechtenstein, Fürst-Franz-Josef-Strasse, LI-9490 Vaduz, Liechtenstein & Utrecht University, Janskerkhof 12, NL-3512 BL, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Sascha Kraus

Authors
  1. Carl Henning Reschke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sascha Kraus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carl Henning Reschke.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reschke, C.H., Kraus, S. An Evolutionary Perspective on the Management of Stability and Change. Evolut Inst Econ Rev 5, 259–278 (2009). https://doi.org/10.14441/eier.5.259

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14441/eier.5.259

Keywords

Search

Navigation