Skip to main content
Log in

What Can Economics Learn from Post-Darwinist Developments in Biological Evolutionary Theory Represented by S. Kauffman and L. Margulis? — An Application Study in Asian Economic Systems

  • Article
  • Published:
Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the past couple of decades, there has been a conspicuous development in biological evolutionary theories, which are more or less different from traditional neo-Darwinism. Among them, the biological self-organization theory of Stuart Kauffman and Serial Endosymbiosis Theory by Lynn Margulis deserve most attention in two respects: one is that they provided persuasive explanations for the course of evolution different from orthodox neo-Darwinism, and the other is that their theories are considered to be applicable to certain aspects of economic phenomena. By its nature, the self-organization theory could be more applied to the rising phase of an economy, whereas the SET theory could be basically applied to the defensive case of an economy in a survival crisis. This paper first gives a brief summary of recent developments in post-Darwinist types of evolutionary theories, putting particular focus on the above two theories, and next tries an application study to analyze some empirical cases in Asian economies based on these two theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Goodwin, B. (1994) How the Leopard Changed in the Spot: the Evolution of Complexity, Princeton University Press, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda, K. (1997) Goodbye Darwinism — A Lecture for Structural Evolution (in Japanese), Kodansha, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko, K. (2003) What is Life? — Introduction for Complexity Theory of Like (in Japanese), Tokyo University Press, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. (1995) At Home in the Universe—The Search for the Law of Self-Organization and Complexity, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestler, A. (1967) The Ghost in the Machine, Huchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1996) The Self-Organizing Economy, Blackwell, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margulis, L. (1999) Symbiotic Planet — A New Look at Evolution, Orion Publishing Group Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • - and Sagan, D. (2000) What is Life?, University of California Press, Berkley and Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu, H. (1999) Life and its Location (in Japanese), NTT Tokyo, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tominomori, K. (2001) Economics of Self-Organization and Emergence (in Japanese), Springer Verlag, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • - (2005) Self-Organization of a New Economic Order — Based on the East Asian Quadrangle, Economic Journal of Hokkaido University 34: 215–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trefil, J. (1997) Are We Unique?, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenji Tominomori.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tominomori, K. What Can Economics Learn from Post-Darwinist Developments in Biological Evolutionary Theory Represented by S. Kauffman and L. Margulis? — An Application Study in Asian Economic Systems. Evolut Inst Econ Rev 3, 71–87 (2006). https://doi.org/10.14441/eier.3.71

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14441/eier.3.71

Keywords

Navigation