Skip to main content
Log in

The Monetary Circuit —A “Mathematical Institutional” Interpretation

  • Article
  • Published:
Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Cencini—Schmitt macroeconomic circuit originates with and is closed by a bank. It is cast in double-entry book-keeping terms. We offer a processual interpretation along the “mathematical institutional” lines suggested by Martin Shubik. The objective is to elaborate upon the connection between commercial banks and central banks. The central bank in the circuit approach is no more than a clearing house. We suggest, on the other hand, that it is an integral part of the process of production and accumulation in a capitalist economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cencini, A. (1995) Monetary Theory: National and International, Routledge, London and New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • - (2001) Monetary Macroeconomics: A New Approach, Routledge, London and New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, K. (2001) Money and the Market, Routledge, London-New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Theory (2004) Economic Theory 24.3, Springer-Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 465–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, B. (2004) “Why the Federal Reserve Should Not Adopt Inflation Targeting,” International Finance 7.1: 129–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingham, G. (2004) “The Emergence of State Money,” in L. R. Wray (ed) Credit and State Theories of Money, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 173–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. (2004) “The Institutions of Monetary Policy,” The American Economic Review 94.2: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nell, E. J. (1996) “The Circuit of Money in a Production Economy,” in G. Deleplace and E. S. Nell (ed) Money in Motion, Macmillan Press, London, pp. 245–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, M. S. (2004) “State, money, catallaxy: underlabouring for a chartalist theory of money,” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 26.2: 205–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, P. L. (2004) “A Common Currency, Early U.S. Monetary Policy and the Transition to the Dollar,” NBER Working Paper 10702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, B. (1996) “A New Paradigm for the Determination of Money Prices,” in G. Deleplace and E. J. Nell (ed) Money in Motion, Macmillan Press, London, pp. 104–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubik, M. (1975a) “The General Equilibrium Model is Incomplete and Not Adequate for the Reconciliation of Microeconomic and Macroeconomic Theory,” Kyklos 34.3: 365–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • - (1975b) “Mathematical Models for a Theory of Money and Financial Institutions,” in R. H. Day and T. Groves (ed) Adaptive Economic Models, Academic Press, New York, pp. 513–574.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • - (1999a) The Theory of Money and Financial Institutions volume 1, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts-London.

    Google Scholar 

  • - (1999b) The Theory of Money and Financial Institutions volume 2, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts-London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray, R. L. (2004) “Conclusion: The Credit Money and State Money Approaches,” in L. R. Wray (ed) Credit and State Theories of Money, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 223–262.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Romar Correa.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Correa, R. The Monetary Circuit —A “Mathematical Institutional” Interpretation. Evolut Inst Econ Rev 2, 199–212 (2006). https://doi.org/10.14441/eier.2.199

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14441/eier.2.199

Keywords

Navigation