Abstract
A view has emerged which sees Adam Smith’s main contribution to economics in terms of his equilibrium theory. This paper argues that equilibrium economics was neither Smith’s main contribution nor his chief concern. It is true that Smith made a few observations which may be construed as equilibrium economics in some loose sense. For example, his observation that the market price of a commodity has a tendency to gravitate towards its natural price; or the rate of profit in different employments tends towards equality. But from this it cannot be concluded that Smith was chiefly an equilibrium theorist. In the first place, it needs to be emphasised that the ‘tendency’ towards equilibrium, which Smith talked about, is not the same thing as an equilibrium ‘outcome’. Equilibrium as an outcome is more likely to be reached in a stationary state than in an evolutionary system in the process of continuous dynamic motion. Smith’s evolutionary perspective, his analysis of the division of labour, capital accumulation, and the institutions most conducive to the generation of wealth, all point to the fact that Smith was more concerned with dynamic analysis than with static equilibrium. Finally, barring a few observations on the equilibrating tendency in the system, most of the Wealth of Nations is not devoted to this question.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow, K. J. and F. H. Hahn (1971) General Competitive Analysis, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
Barber, W. J. (1967) A History of Economic Thought, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.
Black, R. D. C. (1976) “Smith’s Contribution in Historical Perspective,” in T. Wilson and A. S. Skinner (ed) The Market and the State: Essays in Honour of Adam Smith, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 42–72.
Blaug, M. (1999) “The Formalist Revolution or What Happened to Orthodox Economics after World War II?” in R. E. Backhouse and C. John (eds) From the Classical Economics to the Theory of the Firm: Essays in Honour of D.P. O’Brien, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham and Northampton, MA, pp. 257–280.
Buchanan, J. M. and J. Y. Yong (1999) “Generalized Increasing Returns, Euler’s Theorem and Competitive Equilibrium,“ History of Political Economy 31. 3: 511–523.
- (2000) “A Smithean Perspective on Increasing Returns,” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22. 1: 43–48.
Cannan, E. (1976) “Editor’s Introduction,” in An Enquiry into Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. xix–liv.
Chandra, R. (2003) “Allyn Young Revisited,” Journal of Economic Studies 30. 1: 46–65.
- (2004a) “Saving, Investment and Growth: A Smithian Perspective,” Strathclyde Papers in Economics, Department of Economics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, pp. 3–11.
- (2004b) “Adam Smith, Allyn Young and the Division of Labour,” Journal of Economic Issues 38. 3: 787–805.
Chandra, R. and R. J. Sandilands (forthcoming), “Does Modern Endogenous Growth Theory Adequately Represent Allyn Young?”, Cambridge Journal of Economics.
Coase, R. H. (1994) Essays on Economics and Economists, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Currie, L. (1997) “Implications of an Endogenous Growth Theory of Growth in Allyn Young’s Macroeconomic Concept of Increasing Returns,” History of Political Economy 29. 3: 413–443.
Douglas, P. (1927) “Smith’s Theory of Value and Distribution,” in Adam Smith 1776–1926, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 77–115.
Eltis, W. A. (1975) “Adam Smith’s Theory of Economic Growth,” in A. S. Skinner and T. Wilson (eds) Essays on Adam Smith, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 426–454.
Hahn, F. (1981) “Reflections on the Invisible Hand,” Lloyd’s Bank Review 144 (April): 1–21.
Hollander, S. (1971) “Some Implications of Adam Smith’s Analysis of Investment Priorities,” History of Political Economy 3: 238–264.
- (1973) The Economics of Adam Smith, Heinemann, London.
Hutchison, T. (1999) “Adam Smith and General Equilibrium Theory,” in R. E. Backhouse and J. Creedy (eds) From the Classical Economics to the Theory of the Firm: Essays in Honour of D.P. O’Brien, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham and Northampton, MA, pp. 243–256.
Kaldor, N. (1972) “The Irrelevance of Equilibrium Economics,” Economic Journal 82 (December): 1237–1255.
Kern, W. S. (2001) “Classical Economic Man: Was He Interested in Keeping up With the Joneses?” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 23. 3: 353–368.
Knight, F. (1960) Intelligence and Democratic Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Marshall, A. (1890) Principles of Economics, 1938 Edition, Macmillan and Co., London.
Mehrling, P. G. and R. J. Sandilands (1999) Money and Growth: Selected Papers of Allyn Abbott Young, Routledge, London and New York.
Milgate, M. (1987) “Equilibrium: Development of the Concept,” in J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman (eds) The Invisible Hand, Macmillan, London, pp. 105–113.
Montes, L. (2003) “Smith and Newton: Some Methodological Issues Concerning General Economic Equilibrium Theory,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 27. 5: 723–747.
Myint, H. (1977) “Adam Smith’s Theory of International Trade in the Perspective of Economic Development,” Economica 44: 231–248.
O’Brien, D. P. (1994) Methodology, Money and the Firm: Collected Essays, Volume 1, Edward Elgar, Aldershot.
Peil, J. (1999) Adam Smith and Economic Science: A Methodological Interpretation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham and Northampton, MA.
Raphael, D. D. (1985) Adam Smith, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.
Rashid, S. (1992) “Adam Smith and the Market Mechanism,” History of Political Economy 24. 1: 129–152.
Reid, G. C. (1989) Classical Economic Growth: An Analysis in the Tradition of Adam Smith, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Richardson, G. B. (1975) “Adam Smith on Competition and Increasing Returns,” in A. S. Skinner and T. Wilson (ed) Essays on Adam Smith, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 350–360.
Robbins, L. C. (1932) An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, Third Edition 1984, Macmillan, London.
Romer, P. (1986) “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth,” Journal of Political Economy 94: 1002–1037.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1954) History of Economic Analysis, 1982 Edition, Allen and Unwin, London.
Smith, A. (1776) An Enquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Ed. E. Cannan (1976), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
- (1759) The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Ed. D. D. Raphael and A. L. Macfie (1976), Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Stigler, G. J. (1976) “The Successes and Failures of Professor Smith,” Journal of Political Economy 84. 6: 1199–1213.
Veblen, T. (1898) “Why is Economics not an Evolutionary Science?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 12. 4: 373–397.
Viner, J. (1928) “Adam Smith and Laissez Faire,” in Adam Smith 1776–1926, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 116–155.
Winch, D. (1997) “Adam Smith’s Problems and Ours,” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 44. 4: 384–402.
Young, A. (1928) “Increasing Returns and Economic Progress,” Economic Journal 152: 527–542.
- (1929a) “Price,” The Encyclopaedia Britannica 1928, The Encyclopaedia Britannica Company, London.
- (1929b) “Big Business: How the Economic System Grows and Evolves Like a Living Organism,” in The Book of Popular Science, The Grolier Society, New York, pp. 5387–5394. Reprinted in Mehrling and Sandilands (1999), pp. 411–420.
- (1990) “Nicholas Kaldor’s Notes on Allyn Young’s LSE Lectures, 1927–1929”, Journal of Economic Studies 17. 3/4: 18–114.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Chandra, R. Adam Smith and Competitive Equilibrium. Evolut Inst Econ Rev 1, 57–83 (2004). https://doi.org/10.14441/eier.1.57
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14441/eier.1.57