Evolutionary and Institutional Economics as the New Mainstream?

  • Geoffrey M. Hodgson


Mainstream economics has changed radically since the 1980s, offering greatly enhanced opportunities for intervention by evolutionary and institutional economics. This article surveys the extent of this transformation and the extent that mainstream economics has moved in an evolutionary and institutional direction. There are also signs of a possible gestalt shift in the social sciences, where rules are seen as constitutive of social relations and social reality. This contrasts with the former emphasis in mainstream economics on incremental change and equilibria. On the other hand, mainstream economics has a preoccupation with technique over substance, and the barriers between disciplines impair appropriate conceptual developments.


evolutionary economics institutional economics endogenous preferences bounded rationality mainstream economics 


B0 B52 D0 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akerlof, G. A. and W. T. Dickens (1982) “The Economic Consequences of Cognitive Dissonance,” American Economic Review 73.3: 307–319.Google Scholar
  2. - and R. E. Kranton (2005) “Identity and the Economics of Organizations,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19.1: 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aoki, M. (2001) Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Arrow, K. J. (1995) “dViewpoint: The Future,” Science 267: 1617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arthur, W. B. (2006) “Out-of-Equilibrium Economics and Agent-Based Modeling,” in K. L. Judd, L. Tesfatsion, M. D. Intrigilator and K. J. Arrow (eds) Handbook of Computational Economics, Vol. 2: Agent-Based Computational Economics, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  6. Blaug, M. (1997) “Ugly Currents in Modern Economics,” Options Politiques 18.17: 3–8. [Reprinted in Uskali Mäki (ed) (2002) Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism and Social Construction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.]Google Scholar
  7. Bowles, S. (1998) “Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and Other Economic Institutions,” Journal of Economic Literature 36.1: 75–111.Google Scholar
  8. - (2004) Microeconomics: Behavior, Institutions, and Evolution, Princeton University Press and Russell Sage Foundation, Princeton and New York.Google Scholar
  9. Camerer, C. (1997) “Progress in Behavioral Game Theory,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11.4: 67–88.Google Scholar
  10. - (2003) Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  11. au]-, G. Loewenstein and M. Rabin (eds) (2004) Advances in Behavioral Economics, Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton University Press, New York and Princeton.Google Scholar
  12. Colander, D. C. (2005a) “The Making of an Economist Redux,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19.1: 175–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. - (2005b) “The Future of Economics: The Appropriately Educated in Pursuit of the Knowable,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 29.6: 927–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. -, R. P. F. Holt and J. B. RosserJr. (2004a) “The Changing Face of Economics,” Review of Political Economy 16.4: 485–499.Google Scholar
  15. — (2004b) The Changing Face of Economics: Interviews with Cutting Edge Economists, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  16. Commons, J. R. (1925) “Marx Today: Capitalism and Socialism,” Atlantic Monthly 136: pp. 682–693.Google Scholar
  17. - (1934) Institutional Economics—Its Place in Political Economy, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Davis, J. B. (2003) The Theory of the Individual in Economics: Identity and Value, Routledge, London and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. - (2006) “The Turn in Economics: Neoclassical Dominance to Mainstream Pluralism?” Journal of Institutional Economics 2.1: 1–20.Google Scholar
  20. Dequech, D. (2002) “The Demarcation Between the ‘Old’ and the ‘New’ Institutional Economics: Recent Complications,” Journal of Economic Issues 36.2: 565–572.Google Scholar
  21. Dopfer, K. (2004) “The Economic Agent as Rule Maker and Rule User: Homo Sapiens Oeconomicus,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14.2: 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. -, J. Foster and J. Potts (2004) “Micro-Meso-Macro,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14.3: 263–279.Google Scholar
  23. Fehr, E. and U. Fischbacher (2002) “Why Do Social Preferences Matter—The Impact of Non- Selfish Motives on Competition, Cooperation and Incentives,” Economic Journal 112: C1–C33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Field, A. J. (1979) “On the Explanation of Rules Using Rational Choice Models,” Journal of Economic Issues 13.1: 49–72.Google Scholar
  25. - (1981) “The Problem with Neoclassical Institutional Economics: A Critique with Special Reference to the North/Thomas Model of Pre-1500 Europe,” Explorations in Economic History 18.2: 174–198.Google Scholar
  26. - (1984) “Microeconomics, Norms and Rationality,” Economic Development and Cultural Change 32.4: 683–711.Google Scholar
  27. Gintis, H. (2000) Game Theory Evolving: A Problem-Centered Introduction to Modeling Stategic Interaction, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  28. Groenewegen, J., F. Kerstholt and A. Nagelkerke (1995) “On Integrating the New and Old Institutionalisms: Douglass North Building Bridges,” Journal of Economic Issues 29.2: 467–475.Google Scholar
  29. Haavelmo, T. (1997) “Econometrics and the Welfare State” (1989 Nobel Lecture), American Economic Review 87 (supplement): 13–17.Google Scholar
  30. Hahn, F. H. (1991) “The Next Hundred Years,” Economic Journal 101.1: 47–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hammond, P. J. (1976) “Changing Tastes and Coherent Dynamic Choice,” Review of Economic Studies 43.1: 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Haltiwanger, J. and M. Waldman (1985) “Rational Expectations and the Limits of Rationality: An Analysis of Heterogeneity,” American Economic Review 75.3: 159–173.Google Scholar
  33. Hargreaves, H., P. Shaun and Y. Varoufakis (1995) Game Theory: A Critical Introduction, Routledge, London and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hayek, F. A. (1960) The Constitution of Liberty, Routledge and Kegan Paul and University of Chicago Press, London and Chicago.Google Scholar
  35. - (1978) New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  36. - (1988) The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism. The Collected Works of Friedrich August Hayek, Vol. I, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  37. Hirsch, F. (1977) Social Limits to Growth, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  38. Hodgson, G. M. (1988) Economics and Institutions: A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics, Polity Press and University of Pennsylvania Press, Cambridge and Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  39. - (1993) Economics and Evolution: Bringing Life Back Into Economics, Polity Press and University of Michigan Press, Cambridge UK and Ann Arbor MI.Google Scholar
  40. - (1997) “The Ubiquity of Habits and Rules,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 21.6: 663–684.Google Scholar
  41. - (2004) The Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism, Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
  42. - (2006) Economics in the Shadows of Darwin and Marx: Essays on Institutional and Evolutionary Themes, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.Google Scholar
  43. - (2007) “The Revival of Veblenian Institutional Economics,” Journal of Economic Issues 41.2 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  44. - and T. Knudsen (2004) “The Complex Evolution of a Simple Traffic Convention: The Functions and Implications of Habit,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 54.1: 19–47.Google Scholar
  45. Judd, K. L., L. Tesfatsion, M. D. Intrigilator and K. J. Arrow (eds) (2006) Handbook of Computational Economics, Vol. 2: Agent-Based Computational Economics, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  46. Kagel, J. H. and A. E. Roth (eds) (1995) The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  47. Kahneman, D. (1994) “New Challenges to the Rationality Assumption,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 150.1: 18–36.Google Scholar
  48. Kirman, A. P. (1989) “The Intrinsic Limits of Modern Economic Theory: The Emperor Has No Clothes,” Economic Journal (Conference Papers) 99: 126–139.Google Scholar
  49. - and L. A. Gérard-Varet (eds) (1999) Economics Beyond the Millennium, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  50. Knight, J. (1992) Institutions and Social Conflict, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lane, D. A. (1993) “Artificial Worlds and Economics,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 3.2: 89–107 and 3.3: 177-197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lawson, T. (1997) Economics and Reality, Routledge, London and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Loomes, G. (1998) “Probabilities vs Money: A Test of Some Fundamental Assumptions About Rational Decision Making,” Economic Journal 108.1: 477–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. - (1999) “Some Lessons from Past Experiments and Some Challenges for the Future,” Economic Journal 109.2: F35–45.Google Scholar
  55. Mäki, U. (1992) “On the Method of Isolation in Economics,” in C. Dilworth (ed) Idealization IV: Intelligibility in Science, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 317–351.Google Scholar
  56. Mantzavinos, C. (2001) Individuals, Institutions and Markets, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McMillan, J. (2002) Reinventing the Bazaar: A Natural History of Markets, Norton, New York and London.Google Scholar
  58. Nelson, R. R. (1995) “Recent Evolutionary Theorizing About Economic Change,” Journal of Economic Literature 33.1: 48–90.Google Scholar
  59. - and S. G. Winter (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  60. North, D. C. (1991) “Institutions,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5.1: 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. - (1994) “Economic Performance Through Time,” American Economic Review 84.3: 359–367.Google Scholar
  62. Ostrom, E. (2005) Understanding Institutional Diversity, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  63. Pagano, U. (1999) “Is Power an Economic Good? Notes on Social Scarcity and the Economics of Positional Goods” in S. Bowles, M. Franzini and U. Pagano (eds) The Politics and the Economics of Power, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 63–85.Google Scholar
  64. Pagano, U. (2000) “Bounded Rationality, Institutionalism and the Diversity of Economic Institutions,” in F. Louçã and M. Perlman (eds) Is Economics an Evolutionary Science? The Legacy of Thorstein Veblen, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, pp. 95–113.Google Scholar
  65. Pålsson Syll, L. (1992) “Notes on Neoinstitutional Economics,” Scandinavian Economic History Review 40.2: 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Parra, C. M. (2005) “Rules and Knowledge,” Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review 2.1: 81–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Potts, J. (2000) The New Evolutionary Microeconomics: Complexity, Competence and Adaptive Behaviour, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.Google Scholar
  68. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (ed) (1987) The Robot’s Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence, Ablex, Norwood, NJ.Google Scholar
  69. Rizvi, S. A. T. (1994) “The Microfoundations Project in General Equilibrium Theory,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 18.4: 357–377.Google Scholar
  70. Rutherford, M. H. (1995) “The Old and the New Institutionalism: Can Bridges be Built?” Journal of Economic Issues 29.2: 443–451.Google Scholar
  71. Schotter, A. R. (1981) The Economic Theory of Social Institutions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schumpeter, J. A. (1912) Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung: Eine Untersuchung uber Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjunkturzylkus (in German), Duncker und Humblot, München und Leipzig.Google Scholar
  73. - (1934) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  74. Sened, I. (1997) The Political Institution of Private Property, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  75. Simon, H. A. (1957) Models of Man: Social and Rational. Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  76. Smith, V. L. (1982) “Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science,” American Economic Review 72.5: 923–955.Google Scholar
  77. - (1991) “Rational Choice: The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology,” Journal of Political Economy 99.4: 877–896.Google Scholar
  78. Stigler, G. J. and G. S. Becker (1977) “De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum,” American Economic Review 76.1: 76–90.Google Scholar
  79. Sugden, R. (1986) The Economics of Rights, Co-operation and Welfare, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  80. Vanberg, V. J. (2001) “Markets and the Law,” in N. J. Smelser and P. B. Baltes (eds) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 9221–9227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. - (2002) “Rational Choice versus Program-Based Behavior: Alternative Theoretical Approaches and Their Relevance for the Study of Institutions,” Rationality and Society 14.1: 7–53.Google Scholar
  82. - (2004) “The Rationality Postulate in Economics: Its Ambiguity, Its Deficiency and Its Evolutionary Alternative,” Journal of Economic Methodology 11.1: 1–29.Google Scholar
  83. Veblen, T. B. (1898) “Why Is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 12.3: 373–397. [Reprinted in Veblen (1919).]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. - (1899) The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study in the Evolution of Institutions, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  85. - (1919) The Place of Science in Modern Civilization and Other Essays, Huebsch, New York.Google Scholar
  86. Webb, S. J. and B. Webb (1935) Soviet Communism: A New Civilisation? Longmans Green, London.Google Scholar
  87. Williamson, O. E. (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Anti-Trust Implications: A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  88. - (2000) “The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead,” Journal of Economic Literature 38.3: 595–613.Google Scholar
  89. Winter, S. G. (1990) “Survival, Selection, and Inheritance in Evolutionary Theories of Organization,” in J. V. Singh (ed) Organizational Evolution: New Directions, Sage, London, pp. 269–297.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Business SchoolUniversity of Hertfordshire, De Havilland CampusHatfieldUK

Personalised recommendations