Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 141–187 | Cite as

A New Construction of Ricardian Trade Theory—A Many-country, Many-commodity Case with Intermediate Goods and Choice of Production Techniques—

  • Yoshinori ShiozawaEmail author


Ricardian trade theory is one of the most famous theories of economics but appears to have been little developed. Many attempts were made to extend the theory to multi-country, multi-commodity cases, but none succeeded to construct a general theory that included intermediate goods. A need to include intermediate goods within the theory was evident, but hurdles to introduce intermediate inputs were high. Intermediate goods change the entire structure of analysis; when they are traded, the price of a good is dependent of the prices of imported inputs. Consequently, prices should be determined simultaneously for prices of all countries. The present paper has succeeded in overcoming these difficulties and describes how wages, prices and productions are related. It analyzes the M-country, N-commodity case with choice of techniques and trade of intermediate goods in general terms, thus presenting a new basis for international trade theory. New light was shed on topics like gains and losses from trade, international wage rate discrepancies, and price and quantity adjustments. On a theoretical plane, the new construction eliminates a traditional weakness of the Ricardian theory. The traditional Ricardian theory acknowledged labor as the only input and excluded capital in any form. The new theory, presented here, analyzes capital goods as traded intermediate inputs.


B12 C65 F10 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amano, Akihiro (1966) “Intermediate Goods and the Theory of Comparative Advantage: A Two-Country, Three-Commodity Case,” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 96, 342–345.Google Scholar
  2. Balassa, Bela (1963) “An Empirical Demonstration of Classical Comparative Cost Theory”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 4, 231–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buchanan, James M., and Yong J. Yoon (1994) The Return to Increasing Returns, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  4. Davis, Donald R. (1995) “Intra-industry trade: A Heckscher-Ohlin-Ricardo approach”, Journal of International Economics, 39, 201–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deardorff, Alan V. (2005a) “Ricardian Comparative Advantage with Intermediate Inputs”, North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 16, 39–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deardorff, Alan V. (2005b) “How Robust is Comparative Advantage?” RSIE Discussion Paper, Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, the University of Michigan, No. 537. Available on World Wide Web at Google Scholar
  7. Dornbusch, Rudinger, Stanely Fischer, and Paul Samuelson (1977) “Comparative Advantage, Trade and Payments in a Ricardian Model with a Continuum of Goods,” American Economic Review, 67, 823–839.Google Scholar
  8. Emmanuel, Arghiri (1969) L’échange inǵal: essai sur les antagonismes dans les rapports économiques internationaux, François Maspéro, Paris.Google Scholar
  9. Gale, David (1960) The Theory of Linear Economic Models, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  10. Graham F. D. (1948) The Theory of International Trade, Princeton; Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Haberler, Gottfried (1936) Theory of International Trade, translated from the German 1933 edition by A. Stonier and F. Benham, London: William Hodge and Co.Google Scholar
  12. Helpman, Elhanan and Paul R. Krugman (1985) Market Structure and Foreign Trade, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Higashida, Keisaku (2005) “Intermediate goods and international production specialization pattern: multi-country multi-commodity case”, (in Japanese) Ishikawa and Furusawa (2005) Chap.17, pp. 289–302.Google Scholar
  14. Ikema, Makoto (1993) “Determination of international production specialization pattern: case of multi-country multi-commodity case”, (in Japanese) Hitotsubashi Ronso, 110(6), 1–22. Reprinted in Ishikawa and Furusawa (2005) as Chap. 15.Google Scholar
  15. Ishikawa, Jota, and Taiji Furusawa (eds.) (2005) Development of International Trade Theory, (in Japanese) Bunshindo.Google Scholar
  16. Jones, Ronald W. (1961) “Comparative Advantage and the Theory of Tariffs: A Multi-Country, Multi-commodity Model,” Review of Economics Studies, 28(3), 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones, Ronald W. (2000) Globalization and the Theory of Input Trade, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jones, Ronald W. and J. Peter Neary (1984) “The Positive Theory on International Trade”, Handbook of International Economics, vol. I, Edited by R. W. Jones and P. B. Kenan, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.Google Scholar
  19. Jones, Ronald, Henry Kierzkowsky and Chen Lurong (2005) “What does evidence tells us about fragmentation and outsourcing?” Availabe at Google Scholar
  20. Koopmans, T. C. (ed.) (1951) Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  21. Krugman, Paul (1996) “Ricardo’s Difficult Idea”, paper presented at the Manchester Conference on Free Trade, available on World Wide Web at Google Scholar
  22. Krugman, Paul (1979) “Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade”, Journal of International Economics, 9(4) 469–479. Reprinted in Buchanan and Yoong (1994) as Chapter 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McKenzie, Lionel W. (1954a) “Specialization and Efficiency in World Production”, Review of Economic Studies, 21(3), 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McKenzie, Lionel W. (1954b) “On Equilibrium in Graham’s Model of World Trade and Other Competitive Systems”, Econometrica, 22(3), 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McKenzie, Lionel W. (1956) “Specialization in Production and the Production Possibility Locus”, Review of Economic Studies, 23(3), 56–64.Google Scholar
  26. Negishi, Takashi (1972) General equilibrium theory and international trade, Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  27. Negishi, Takashi (1985) Economic Theories in a Non-Walrassian Tradition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Negishi, Takashi (1995) History of economic Theory, Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  29. Minabe, Nobuo (1995) Production and International Trade, Otemon Gakuin University.Google Scholar
  30. Nikaido, Hukukane (1961) Linear Mathematics for Economics (in Japanese), Baifukan.Google Scholar
  31. Ricardo, David (1817: 1951) On Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, P. Sraffa ed. with M. H. Dobb, The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Samuelson, Paul A. (2001) “A Ricardo-Sraffa Paradigm Comparing Gains from Trade in Inputs and Finished Goods”, Journal of Economic Literature, 39(4), (December 2001) 1204–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sanyal, Kalyan K., and Ronald W. Jones (1982) “The Theory of Trade in Middle Products”, The American Economic Review, 72(1) 16–31.Google Scholar
  34. Shiozawa, Yoshinori (1975) “Durable Capital Goods and Their Valuation”, KIER Discussion Paper, Kyoto Institute of Economic Research, No. 91, 1–39.Google Scholar
  35. Shiozawa, Yoshinori (1985) “International Trade and Choice of Techniques: toward an international value theory I” (in Japanese) Keizaigaku Zasshi (Osaka City University), 85(6), 44–61.Google Scholar
  36. Shiozawa, Yoshinori (2007 in press) “A New Construction of Ricardian Trade Theory: toward an international value theory II”, (in Japanese) Keizaigaku Zasshi (Osaka City University).Google Scholar
  37. Su, Francis Edward (1999) “Rental Harmony: Sperner’s Lemma in Fair Division”, American Mathematical Monthly, 106, 930–942. Available at CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Suranovic, Steven (1997-2004) International Trade Theory and Policy: Lecture Notes, at Google Scholar
  39. Takamasu, Akira (1991) Neo-Ricardian Trade Theory, (in Japanese) Sobunsha.Google Scholar
  40. Viner, Jacob (1937) Studies in the Theory of International Trade, London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  41. Yang, Xiaokai, Wenli Chang, Heling Shi and Christis G. Tombazos (Eds.) (2005) An Inframarginal Approach to Trade Theory, Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  42. Ziegler, Günter M. (1995) Lectures on Polytopes, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Osaka City UniversityOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations