Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Frailty in Chile: Development of a Frailty Index Score Using the Chilean National Health Survey 2016–2017

  • Original Research
  • Published:
The Journal of Frailty & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Frailty Index (FI) is used to quantify and summarize vulnerability status in people. In Chile, no development and assessment of a FI have been explored.

Objective

To develop and evaluate a FI using representative data from Chilean adults aged 40 years and older stratified by sex.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

National representative data from the Chilean National Health Survey 2016–2017 (CNHS 2016–2017).

Participants

3,036 participants older than 40 years with complete data for all variables.

Measurements

A 49-item FI was developed and evaluated. This FI included deficits from comorbidities, functional limitations, mental health status, physical activity, anthropometry, medications, and falls. A score between 0 and 1 was calculated for each person. Descriptive statistics and linear regression models were employed to evaluate the FI’s performance in the population. Comparative analyses were carried out to evaluate the FI score by age (<60 and ≥ 60 years).

Results

The mean FI score was 0.15 (SD:0.09), with a 99% upper limit of 0.46. Scores were greater in women than men (0.17 [SD:0.09]) vs. 0.12 [0.08]); in people older than 80 years (0.22 [0.11]), and in people with ≤8 years of education (0.18 [0.10]) compared with those with >12 years (0.12 [0.08]). The average age-related increase in the FI was 2.3%. When a cut-off point ≥ 0.25 was applied, the prevalence of frail individuals was 11.8% (95% CI: 10.0 to 13.8) in the general population. The prevalence was higher in women 15.9% [95% CI: 13.3 to 18.9] than men 7.4% [95% CI: 5.3 to 10.1]. In a comparative analysis by age, higher FI mean scores and prevalence of frail were observed in people ≥ 60 than younger than 60.

Conclusions

The mean FI score and frailty prevalence were higher in women than men, in people with fewer years of formal education, and incremented markedly with age. This FI can be used for early detection of frailty status focusing on women and middle-aged people as a strategy to delay or prevent frailty-related consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walston J, Hadley EC, Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Newman AB, Studenski SA, et al. Research Agenda for Frailty in Older Adults: Toward a Better Understanding of Physiology and Etiology: Summary from the American Geriatrics Society/National Institute on Aging Research Conference on Frailty in Older Adults: Research agenda for frailty. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Jun;54(6):991–1001. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1532-5415.2006.00745.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Collard RM, Boter H, Schoevers RA, Oude Voshaar RC. Prevalence of Frailty in Community-Dwelling Older Persons: A Systematic Review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Aug;60(8):1487–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04054.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. The Lancet. 2013 Mar;381(9868):752–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Buckinx F, Rolland Y, Reginster JY, Ricour C, Petermans J, Bruyère O. Burden of frailty in the elderly population: perspectives for a public health challenge. Arch Public Health. 2015 Dec;73(1):19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-015-0068-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Buta BJ, Walston JD, Godino JG, Park M, Kalyani RR, Xue QL, et al. Frailty assessment instruments: Systematic characterization of the uses and contexts of highly-cited instruments. Ageing Res Rev. 2016 Mar;26:53–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2015.12.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mitnitski AB, Mogilner AJ, Rockwood K. Accumulation of Deficits as a Proxy Measure of Aging. Sci World J. 2001;1:323–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kojima G, Iliffe S, Walters K. Frailty index as a predictor of mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2018 Mar 1;47(2):193–200. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afx162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kane AE, Howlett SE. Sex differences in frailty: Comparisons between humans and preclinical models. Mech Ageing Dev. 2021 Sep;198:111546. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2021.111546.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gordon E, Hubbard R. Physiological basis for sex differences in frailty. Curr Opin Physiol. 2018 Dec;6:10–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2016.12.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kirkwood TBL. Understanding the Odd Science of Aging. Cell. 2005 Feb;120(4):437–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilson D, Jackson T, Sapey E, Lord JM. Frailty and sarcopenia: The potential role of an aged immune system. Ageing Res Rev. 2017 Jul;36:1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2017.01.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sezgin D, Liew A, O’Donovan MR, O’Caoimh R. Pre-frailty as a multi-dimensional construct: A systematic review of definitions in the scientific literature. Geriatr Nur (Lond). 2020 Mar;41(2):139–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2019.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hanlon P, Nicholl BI, Jani BD, Lee D, McQueenie R, Mair FS. Frailty and pre-frailty in middle-aged and older adults and its association with multimorbidity and mortality:a prospective analysis of 493 737 UK Biobank participants. Lancet Public Health. 2018 Jul;3(7):e323–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30091-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Petermann-Rocha F, Martínez-Sanguinetti MA, Leiva-Ordoñez AM, Celis-Morales C. Carga global de morbilidad y mortalidad atribuible a factores de riesgo entre los años 1990 y 2019: ¿Cuál es la realidad chilena? Rev Médica Chile. 2021 Mar;149(3):484–6. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872021000300484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Aranco N, Stampini M, Ibarrarán P, Medellín N. Panorama de envejecimiento y dependencia en América Latina y el Caribe [Internet]. Inter-American Development Bank; 2018 Jan. doi.org/10.18235/0000984

  16. United NAtions Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. Latin America and the Caribbean demographic observatory 2019: population projections. S.1.: UNITED NATIONS; 2022.

  17. Troncoso-Pantoja C, Concha-Cisternas Y, Leiva-Ordoñez AM, Martínez-Sanguinetti MA, Petermann-Rocha F, Díaz-Martínez X, et al. Prevalencia de fragilidad en personas mayores de Chile: resultados de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud 2016–2017. Rev Médica Chile. 2020 Oct;148(10):1418–26. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872020001001418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Albala C, Lera L, Sanchez H, Angel B, Márquez C, Arroyo P, et al. Frequency of frailty and its association with cognitive status and survival in older Chileans. Clin Interv Aging. 2017 Jun;Volume 12:995–1001. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S136906.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. MINSAL. Encuesta Nacional de Salud 2016–2017. Chile: Ministerio de Salud; 2017

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leng S, Chen X, Mao G. Frailty syndrome: an overview. Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Mar;433. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S45300.

  21. Rockwood K. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. Can Med Assoc J. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):489–95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Searle SD, Mitnitski A, Gahbauer EA, Gill TM, Rockwood K. A standard procedure for creating a frailty index. BMC Geriatr. 2008 Dec;8(1):24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-8-24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Rockwood K, Mitnitski A. Frailty in Relation to the Accumulation of Deficits. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007 Jul 1;62(7):722–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/62.7.722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Williams DM, Jylhävä J, Pedersen NL, Hägg S. A Frailty Index for UK Biobank Participants. J Gerontol Ser A. 2019 Mar 14;74(4):582–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gly094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Khadka J, Visvanathan R, Theou O, Moldovan M, Amare AT, Lang C, et al. Development and validation of a frailty index based on Australian Aged Care Assessment Program data. Med J Aust. 2020 Oct;213(7):321–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hoogendijk EO, Theou O, Rockwood K, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, Deeg DJH, Huisman M. Development and validation of a frailty index in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Oct;29(5):927–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-016-0689-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fried LP, Ferrucci L, Darer J, Williamson JD, Anderson G. Untangling the Concepts of Disability, Frailty, and Comorbidity: Implications for Improved Targeting and Care. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004 Mar 1;59(3):M255–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/59.3.m255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. O’Caoimh R, Sezgin D, O’Donovan MR, Molloy DW, Clegg A, Rockwood K, et al. Prevalence of frailty in 62 countries across the world: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level studies. Age Ageing. 2021 Jan 8;50(1):96–104. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Coelho-Junior HJ, Marzetti E, Picca A, Calvani R, Cesari M, Uchida MC. Prevalence of Prefrailty and Frailty in South America: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies. J Frailty Aging. 2020;9(4):197–213. doi: https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2020.22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Poli S. Frailty is associated with socioeconomic and lifestyle factors in communitydwelling older subjects. Aging Clin Exp Res.: 8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-016-0623-5.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all participants for their cooperation and the Chilean Health Ministry and Department of Public Health, The Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile for commissioning, designing, and conducting the second National Health Survey 20016–2017.

Funding

Financial support: The Chilean National Health Survey (CNHS) 2016–2017 was funded by the Chilean Ministry of Health and led by the Department of Public Health, The Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. The present study was funded by the Chilean Health Ministry as part of the Third health surveillance in Chile. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation or any decision related to this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fanny Petermann-Rocha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest: None.

Ethical standards: The CNHS 2016–2017 was funded by the Chilean Ministry of Health and approved by the Ethics Research Committee of the School of Medicine at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (No. 16–019).

Additional information

Authorship: F.D generated the research question. F.D, F.P.-R. and C.C.-M. planned the analysis. F.D. performed the literature search. F.D performed the analysis with support from C.C-M and F.P-R. F.D wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors critically reviewed this and previous drafts. All authors approved the final draft for submission. F.P-R. is the guarantor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diaz-Toro, F., Petermann-Rocha, F., Lynskey, N. et al. Frailty in Chile: Development of a Frailty Index Score Using the Chilean National Health Survey 2016–2017. J Frailty Aging 12, 97–102 (2023). https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2023.2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2023.2

Key words

Navigation