Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Technological Choices and Labor Market Participation: Negative Income Tax

  • Published:
Eurasian Economic Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we study the effect of the Negative Income Tax (NIT) on reducing inequalities. Using a matching model with a continuous distribution of worker skills, we show that a NIT reduces inequalities in favor of less qualified workers by making firms less selective and jobs less complex. However, this technological choice decreases the workers’ average productivity and therefore increases the unemployment rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu, D., 1998. Why do new technologies complement skills ? Directed technical change and wage inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(4), pp.1055–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amine, S. and Lages Dos Santos, P., 2010. Technological choices and unemployment benefits in a matching model with heterogenous workers. Journal of Economics, 101(1), pp.1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amine, S. and Lages Dos Santos, P., 2011. The influence of labour market institutions on job complexity. Research in Economics, 65(3), pp.209–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bargain, O. and Terraz, I., 2003. Evaluation et mise en perspective des effets incitatifs et redistributifs de la Prime pour l’emploi [The incentive and redistributive effects of the employment prime: Assessment and perspective]. Economie et Prévision, 160/161, pp.121–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R., Duncan, A., McCrae, J., and Meghir, C., 2000. The labour market impact of the working families tax credit. Fiscal Studies, 21(1), pp.65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahuc, P., 2002. A quoi sert la Prime pour l’emploi? [What is the purpose of the French PPE?]. Revue Française d’Economie, 16(3), pp.3–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eissa, N. and Liebman, J., 1996. Labor supply response to the earned income tax credit. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(2), pp.605–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fugazza, M., Le Minez, S., and Pucci, M., 2004. Une première endogénéisation des comportements d’offre de travail dans le modèle INES: Activité des femmes et prestations sociales [The influence of the prime pour l’emploi on female employment in France: An estimate using the Ines model]. Économie et Prévision, 160-161(4–5), pp.79–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikol, F. and Remy, V., 2009. L’effet du RSA sur l’équilibre du marché du travail [The effect of RSA on the labor market equilibrium]. Document d’étude, no.148.

  • Pissarides, C., 2000. Equilibrium unemployment theory. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saez, E., 2002. Optimal income transfer programs: Intensive versus extensive labor supply responses. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), pp.1039–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strand, J., 2002. Wage bargaining and turnover costs with heterogeneous labour and perfect history screening. European Economic Review, 46(7), pp.1209–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samir Amine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amine, S., Santos, P.L.D. Technological Choices and Labor Market Participation: Negative Income Tax. Eurasian Econ Rev 3, 98–113 (2013). https://doi.org/10.14208/eer.2013.03.02.001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14208/eer.2013.03.02.001

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation