Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing High Frequency Data of Stocks that are Traded Simultaneously in the US and Germany: Simulated Versus Empirical Data

  • Published:
Eurasian Economic Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates both the no-arbitrage condition and the efficiency of financial markets by comparing two stock markets: NYSE and XETRA. We analyze German stocks that are traded simultaneously at both exchanges using high frequency data for XETRA, NYSE, and the foreign exchange rates. Converting Euro-prices into Dollar-prices and vice versa reveals possibilities to explore the efficiency as well as arbitrage opportunities of these two stock markets. One measure of efficiency is the phenomenon of stock price clustering, describing the tendency of prices to cluster at certain prices and avoiding others. We see the result of differing extents of clustering on both exchanges, thus violating the no-arbitrage condition. We propose a trading strategy that exploits these differences. Furthermore, we compare our empirical findings with the results we obtain from simulating financial markets. We conclude that simulations that are based on the no-arbitrage condition are not consistent with our empirical observations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aşçıoğlu, A., Comerton-Forde, C., and McInish, T.H., 2007. Price clustering on the Tokyo stock exchange. The Financial Review, 42(2), pp.289–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, C.A., Torous, W.N., and Tschoegl, A.E., 1985. The degree of price resolution: The case of the gold market. The Journal of Futures Markets, 5(1), pp.29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, W.G., Harris, J.H., and Schultz, P.H., 1994. Why did NASDAQ market makers stop avoiding odd-eighth quotes? The Journal of Finance, 49(5), pp.1841–1860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cootner, P.H., 1962. Stock prices: Random vs. systematic changes. Industrial Management Review, 3(2), pp.24–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, D.K.B. Harris, F. H., Lau, S.T., and McInish, T.H., 1999. An investigation of price discovery in informationally-linked markets: equity trading in Malaysia and Singapore. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 9, pp.317–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F., 1965. The behavior of stock market prices. The Journal of Business, 38(1), pp.34–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F., 1970. Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), pp.383–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L., 1991. Stock price clustering and discreteness. Review of Financial Studies, 4(3), pp.389–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, R.D. and Stoll, H.R., 2001. Tick size, bid-ask spreads, and market structure. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36(4), pp.503–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, D.L. and Weston, J.P., 2008. Clustering in US stock prices after decimalization. European Financial Management, 14(1), pp.30–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, C., Pennacchi, G., and Sopranzetti, B., 1999. Bank deposit rate clustering: Theory and empirical evidence. The Journal of Finance, 54(6), pp.2185–2214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont O.A. and Thaler R.H., 2003. Can the market add and subtract? Mispricing in tech stock carve-outs. The Journal of Political Economy, 111, pp. 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeRoy, S.F., 1973. Risk aversion and the martingale property of stock returns. International Economic Review, 14(2), pp.436–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R.E., 1978. Asset prices in an exchange economy. Econometrica, 46(6), pp.1429–1445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M., Pulvino, T., and Stafford, E., 2002. Limited arbitrage in equity markets. The Journal of Finance, 57, pp. 551–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niederhoffer, V., 1965. Clustering of stock prices. Operations Research, 13(2), pp.258–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niederhoffer, V., 1966. A new look at clustering of stock prices. The Journal of Business, 39(2), pp.309–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onnela, J.-P., Töyli, J., and Kaski, K., 2009. Tick size and stock returns. Physica A, 388(4), pp.441–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, M.F.M., 1962. Periodic structure in the Brownian motion of stock prices. Operations Research, 10(3), pp.345–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, L. and Young, C., 1990. The seemingly anomalous price behavior of Royal Dutch/Shell and Unilever N.V./PLC. Journal of Financial Economics, 26, pp. 123–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W. and Alexander, G., 1990. Investments. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

  • Sonnemans, J., 2006. Price clustering and natural resistance points in the Dutch stock market: A natural experiment. European Economic Review, 50(8), pp.1937–1950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sopranzetti, B.J. and Datar, V., 2002. Price clustering in foreign exchange spot markets. Journal of Financial Markets, 5(4), pp.411–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, B., Uphaus, A., and Albers, W., 2001. Numerical decision processing causing stock price clustering? Homo Oeconomicus, 18(2), pp.229–241.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kirsten Rüchardt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rieger, J., Rüchardt, K. & Vogt, B. Comparing High Frequency Data of Stocks that are Traded Simultaneously in the US and Germany: Simulated Versus Empirical Data. Eurasian Econ Rev 1, 126–142 (2011). https://doi.org/10.14208/BF03353827

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14208/BF03353827

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation