Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ownership and Execution of Regional Corporate R&D — Methodological Hints from the Italian Case

  • Published:
Eurasian Business Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper aims to provide methodological suggestions on the measurement of regional corporate R&D, by using a new approach to disentangle corporate R&D by region of ownership and of execution. We make distinction in the concepts: what we call “region of ownership” is where the R&D performer has its registered office and “region of execution” is where the R&D actually takes place. This duplicity allows for the calculation of three regional indicators: regional R&D Autonomy, regional R&D Inward and regional R&D Outward. Using micro-data for Italy in the period 2001–2005, a high level of R&D concentration in a few Italian regions is confirmed; furthermore, information on the strengths and weaknesses of Italian regions are added, addressing regions’ R&D performance as not univocal but representing a complex phenomenon. The growing importance of regional figures at the EU level asks for a more refined overview of economic phenomena, included Science and Technology ones. Given its general approach and the reference to official statistics, the methodology is considered replicable at international level and overtime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Z.J. ed., 1998. Regional innovation, knowledge and global change. London and New York: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D.B. and Feldman M., 1996. R&D Spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86(3), pp.630–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydalot, P. ed., 1986. Milieux innovateurs en Europe [Innovation environment in Europe]. Paris: GREMI, C3E.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J. and Narula, R., 2001. The eclectic paradigm in the global economy. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(2), pp.155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J. and Iammarino S., 2003. Multinational corporations and European regional systems of innovation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A., 1989. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, 99(397), pp.569–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A., 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), pp.128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P., 1992. Regional innovation systems: Competitive regulation in the new Europe. GeoForum, 23(3), pp.365–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P., 2001. Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), pp.945–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, R., 1996. Core competences and the strategic management of R&D. R&D Management, 26(4), pp.345–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. and Narula, R., 1995. The R&D activities of foreign firms in the United States. International Studies of Management & Organization, 25(1–2), pp.39–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, C. ed., 1997. Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, C., 2006. Systems of innovation: Perspectives and challenges. In: F. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, and R. Nelson, eds. The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ch. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, 2008. Monitoring industrial research: The 2008 EU industrial R&D investment scoreboard. Luxembourg: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROSTAT, 2008. R&D expenditure and personnel, statistics in focus 91/2008. Luxembourg: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evangelista, R., Iammarino, S., Mastrostefano, V., and Silvani, A., 2001. Measuring the regional dimension of innovation: Lessons from the Italian innovation survey. Technovation, 21(11), pp.733–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evangelista, R., Iammarino, S., Mastrostefano, V., and Silvani, A., 2002. Looking for regional systems of innovation: Evidence from the Italian innovation survey. Regional Studies, 36(2), pp.173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M.P., 1994. The geography of innovation. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R., 1995. Towards the learning region. Futures, 27(5), pp.527–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freel, M., 2003. Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking and proximity. Research Policy, 32(5), pp.751–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISTAT, 2008. La ricerca e sviluppo in Italia nel 2006, statistiche in breve [Statistics in focus: R&D in Italy in 2006]. Roma: ISTAT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuemmerle, W., 1997. Building effective R&D capabilities abroad. Harvard Business Review, 75(2), pp.61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.A. ed., 1992. National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R., 2000. National innovation systems. In: Z. Acs ed. Regional Innovation, Knowledge and Global Change. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S., 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Boston: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, 2002. Frascati manual. Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, 2008. The internationalization of business R&D: Evidence, impacts and implications. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oerlemans, L., Meeus, M., and Boekema, F., 1998. Do networks matter for innovation? The usefulness of the economic network approach in analysing innovation. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 89, pp.298–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A., 1994. Regional advantage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thursby, J. and Thursby, M., 2006. Here of there? A survey of factors in multinational R&D location. Report to the government-university-industry research roundtable. Washington DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD, 2005. World investment report 2005. Transnational corporations and the iternationalization of R&D. New York and Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Zedtwitz, M. and Gassmann, O., 2002. Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: Four different patterns of managing research and development. Research Policy, 31(4), pp.569–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. FORMIT Foundation — Fondazione per la Ricerca sulla Migrazione e Integrazione delle Tecnologie, Italy

    Claudio Cozza

  2. Joint Research Centre (JRC), Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), European Commission, Spain

    Daniele Paci

  3. Italian National Institute of Statistics, ISTAT, Italy

    Giulio Perani

Authors
  1. Claudio Cozza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniele Paci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Giulio Perani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudio Cozza.

Additional information

The authors acknowledge useful comments received by colleagues at the FIRB-RISC Conference in Milan, September 2009, and at a JRC-IPTS internal seminar in November 2009 and by an anonymous referee. A particular thanks goes to Philip McCann for useful suggestions on the revised structure of the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cozza, C., Paci, D. & Perani, G. Ownership and Execution of Regional Corporate R&D — Methodological Hints from the Italian Case. Eurasian Bus Rev 2, 47–62 (2012). https://doi.org/10.14208/BF03353807

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14208/BF03353807

Keywords

Search

Navigation