Skip to main content
Log in

Neurointensivists’ opinions about death by neurological criteria and organ donation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction: Neurointensivists are at the front line of treatment of patients who progress to death by neurological criteria (DNC). Although some of these patients will become organ donors, there has not been a systematic evaluation of the opinions and resources available to neurointensivists in regard to these important issues.

Methods: We conducted a survey of neurointensivists regarding controversial issues in the declaration of DNC, procedures for discussing death and approaching donor families, and participation in donation after cardiac death (DCD).

Results: The majority of centers described by the respondents had all five most commonly accepted ancillary tests to determine DNC (61%). Radionuclide blood flow studies are the most frequently reported test used (64%). Younger physicians are more likely to use transcranial Doppler exams (TCD) than their older counterparts (41% versus 28%, p<0.001). Discussions about DNC with the family are most often presided by the attending physician, and donation requests are most commonly initiated by organ procurement organization (OPO) representatives, but there is significant variation from center to center. Nine out of 10 physicians in our survey reported that they are likely to participate in DCD.

Conclusion: Despite this enthusiasm, there is no clear consensus on many of the issues surrounding DCD, including how long after cardiac cessation recovery should begin. We believe that this study will serve as a springboard for more discussion about the diagnosis of DNC, the role of physicians in organ requests and donor management, and the procurement of organs through DCD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Diringer MN, Edwards DF. Admission to a neurologic/neurosurgical intensive care unit is associated with reduced mortality rate after intracerebral hemorrhage. Crit Care Med 2001;29:635–640.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gortmaker SL, Beasley CL, Sheehy E, et al. Improving the request process to increase family consent for organ donation. J Transpl Coord 1998;8:210–217.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. UNOS. http://www.unos.org/data/. Date accessed: August 3, 2005.

  4. Williams MA, Lipsett PA, Rushton CH, et al. The physician’s role in discussing organ donation with families. Crit Care Med 2003;31:1568–1573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wamser P, Goetzinger P, Gnant M, Sautner T, Steininger R, Muhlbacher F. What do intensive care unit personnel think about organ donation? Opinion poll amongst transplant centers. Transplant Proc 1993;25:3122–3123.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Coleman-Musser L. The physician’s perspective: a survey of attitudes toward organ donor management. J Transpl Coord 1997;7:55–58.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Practice parameters for determining brain death in adults (summary statement). The Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 1995;45:1012–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Medicare and Medicaid programs; hospital conditions of participation; identification of potential organ, tissue, and eye donors and transplant hospitals’ provision of transplant-related data—HCFA. Final rule. Fed Regist 1998;63:33856–33875.

  9. Pearson IY, Zurynski Y. A survey of personal and professional attitudes of intensivists to organ donation and transplantation. Anaesth Intensive Care 1995;23:68–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chernenko SM, Jensen L, Newburn-Cook C, Bigam DL. Organ donation and transplantation: a survey of critical care health professionals in nontransplant hospitals. Prog Transplant 2005;15:69–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rachmani R. Physicians’ and nurses’ attitudes and knowledge toward brain death. Transplant Proc 1999;31:1912–1913.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Herdman R, Beauchamp TL, Potts JT. The Institute of Medicine’s report on non-heart-beating organ transplantation. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1998;8:83–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Samson K. The gray zone: consensus on non-heart beating donor criteria remains elusive. Neurology Today 2002;2:7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Arnold RM, Youngner SJ. The dead donor rule: should we stretch it, bend it, or abandon it? Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1993;3:263–278.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zamperetti N, Bellomo R, Ronco C. Defining death in non-heart beating organ donors. J Med Ethics 2003;29:182–185.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. DeVita MA, Snyder JV, Arnold RM, Siminoff LA. Observations of withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment from patients who became non-heart-beating organ donors. Crit Care Med 2000;28:1709–1712.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bell MD. Non-heart beating organ donation: old procurement strategy—new ethical problems. J Med Ethics 2003;29:176–181.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Youngner SJ, Arnold RM. Ethical, psychosocial, and public policy implications of procuring organs from non-heart-beating cadaver donors. JAMA 1993;269:2769–2774.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Whetstine L, Bowman K, Hawryluck L. Pro/con ethics debate: is nonheart-beating organ donation ethically acceptable? Crit Care 2002;6:192–195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bos MA. Ethical and legal issues in non-heart-beating organ donation. Transplantation 2005;79:1143–1147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Recommendations for nonheartbeating organ donation. A position paper by the Ethics Committee, American College of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med 2001;29:1826–1831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Truog RD, Robinson WM. Role of brain death and the deaddonor rule in the ethics of organ transplantation. Crit Care Med 2003;31:2391–2396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Young PJ, Matta BF. Anaesthesia for organ donation in the brainstem dead—why bother? Anaesthesia 2000;55:105–106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wace J, Kai M. Anaesthesia for organ donation in the brainstem dead. Anaesthesia 2000;55:590.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Javier Provencio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boissy, A.R., Javier Provencio, J., Smith, C.A. et al. Neurointensivists’ opinions about death by neurological criteria and organ donation. Neurocrit Care 3, 115–121 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1385/NCC:3:2:115

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/NCC:3:2:115

Key Words

Navigation