Skip to main content
Log in

Continuous antibiotic prophylaxis and cerebral spinal fluid infection in patients with intracranial pressure monitors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction: Inconsistencies in the recommendation of prophylactic antibiotics for patients with intracranial pressure monitors compelled us to assess the effect of our standard regimen of continuous antibiotic prophylaxis on cerebrospinal fluid infection. We examined the rate, possible risk factors, causative organisms, and characteristics of infection.

Methods: Three hundred eleven patients admitted between September 1998 and February 2001 with an intracranial pressure monitoring device in place were included. Two hundred eleven patients received a ventriculostomy, 95 an intraparenchymal fiber optic intracranial pressure monitor (ICPM), and 5 both an ICPM and a ventriculostomy.

Results: The overall infection rate was 5.5% (17/311). No patient with an ICPM developed CSF infection. The infection rate among ventriculostomy patients was 8.1% (17/211). The majority of infections (82%) were caused by Gram-positive species. Younger age (OR=1.04 for each year, 95% CI=1.01–1.08, p=0.03) and increasing duration of ventriculostomy insertion (OR=1.2 for each day of catheter insertion, 95% CI=1.1–1.3, p<0.001) were risk factors for CSF infection in multivariate analysis. Infected patients experienced longer lengths of stay in the NICU (p<0.001) and hospital (p<0.001); however, infection did not impact clinical outcome, as measured by mortality and discharge GCS.

Conclusion: ICP monitors have a low overall infection rate. When infection occurs, gram positive organisms predominate. For patients with ventriculostomy, duration of catheter insertion strongly predicts infection, but did not alter in-hospital mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alleyne CH, Jr., Hassan M, Zabramski JM. The efficacy and cost of prophylactic and perioprocedural antibiotics in patients with external ventricular drains. Neurosurgery 2000;47:1124–1127; discussion 1127–1129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lyons MK, Meyer FB. Cerebrospinal fluid physiology and the management of increased intracranial pressure. Mayo Clin Proc 1990; 65:684–707.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aucoin PJ, Kotilainen HR, Gantz NM, Davidson R, Kellogg P, Stone B. Intracranial pressure monitors. Epidemiologic study of risk factors and infections. Am J Med 1986; 80:369–376.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mayhall CG, Archer NH, Lamb VA, et al. Ventriculostomy-related infections. A prospective epidemiologic study. N Engl J Med 1984; 310:553–559.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bader MK, Littlejohns L, Palmer S. Ventriculostomy and intracranial pressure monitoring: in search of a 0% infection rate. Heart Lung 1995; 24:166–172.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Poon WS, Ng S, Wai S. CSF antibiotic prophylaxis for neurosurgical patients with ventriculostomy: a randomised study. Acta Neurochirurgica—Supplementum | Acta Neurochirurgica Suppl 1998; 71:146–148.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Paramore CG, Turner DA. Relative risks of ventriculostomy infection and morbidity. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1994; 127:79–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stenager E, Gerner-Smidt P, Kock-Jensen C. Ventriculostomy-related infections—an epidemiological study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1986; 83:20–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Winfield JA, Rosenthal P, Kanter RK, Casella G. Duration of intracranial pressure monitoring does not predict daily risk of infectious complications. Neurosurgery 1993; 33:424–430.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rebuck JA, Murry KR, Rhoney DH, Michael DB, Coplin WM. Infection related to intracranial pressure monitors in adults: analysis of risk factors and antibiotic prophylaxis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 69:381–384.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Classen DC, Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, Horn SD, Menlove RL, Burke JP. The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical-wound infection. N Engl J Med 1992; 326:281–286.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clark WC, Muhlbauer MS, Lowrey R, Hartman M, Ray MW, Watridge CB. Complications of intracranial pressure monitoring in trauma patients. Neurosurgery 1989; 25:20–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Holloway KL, Barnes T, Choi S, et al. Ventriculostomy infections: the effect of monitoring duration and catheter exchange in 584 patients. J Neurosurg 1996; 85:419–424.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. [erratum appears in Am J Infect Control 1988 Aug;16(4):177.]. AJIC: American Journal of Infection Control | American Journal of Infection Control 1988; 16:128–140.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Teasdale GM. Head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1995; 58:526–539.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jarvis WR. Epidemiology, appropriateness, and cost of vancomycin use. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 26:1200–1203.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Martone WJ. Spread of vancomycin-resistant enterococci: why did it happen in the United States? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998; 19:539–545.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Franges EZ, Beideman ME. Infections related to intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurosci Nurs 1988; 20:94–103.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kanter RK, Weiner LB, Patti AM, Robson LK. Infectious complications and duration of intracranial pressure monitoring. Crit Care Med 1985; 13:837–839.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Khanna RK, Rosenblum ML, Rock JP, Malik GM. Prolonged external ventricular drainage with percutaneous long-tunnel ventriculostomies. J Neurosurg 1995; 83:791–794.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ohrstrom JK, Skou JK, Ejlertsen T, Kosteljanetz M. Infected ventriculostomy: bacteriology and treatment. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1989; 100:67–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fridkin SK, Welbel SF, Weinstein RA. Magnitude and prevention of nosocomial infections in the intensive care unit. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1997; 11:479–496.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosner MJ, Becker DP. ICP monitoring: complications and associated factors. Clin Neurosurg 1976; 23:494–519.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith RW, Alksne JF. Infections complicating the use of external ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg 1976; 44:567–570.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wyler AR, Kelly WA. Use of antibiotics with external ventriculostomies. J Neurosurg 1972; 37:185–187.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bogdahn U, Lau W, Hassel W, Gunreben G, Mertens HG, Brawanski A. Continuous-pressure controlled, external ventricular drainage for treatment of acute hydrocephalus—evaluation of risk factors. Neurosurgery 1992; 31:898–903

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colin T. McDonald.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flibotte, J.J., Lee, K.E., Koroshetz, W.J. et al. Continuous antibiotic prophylaxis and cerebral spinal fluid infection in patients with intracranial pressure monitors. Neurocrit Care 1, 61–68 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1385/NCC:1:1:61

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/NCC:1:1:61

Key Words

Navigation