Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intensive chemotherapy in the treatment of aggressive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate an intensive chemotherapy regimen in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and poor prognosis, as presence of high- or high-intermediate clinical risk, bulky disease, high levels of beta 2 microgloblin, and more than two extranodal sites of involvement at diagnosis.

One hundred previously untreated patients were treated with an intensive CEOP-Bleo regimen with increased doses of cyclophosphamide (1000 mg/m2) and epirubicin (120 mg/m2) in each cycle. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors was employed to ameliorate severe granulocytopenia.

Complete response was achieved in 79 cases (79%). With a median follow-up of 32.3 mo (range 10–45 mo) only seven patients have relapsed. Thus, actuarial curves at 3 yr, showed that event-free survival was 72%. Five died secondary to tumor progression, actuarial curves at 3-yr for overall survival were 75%. Toxicity was mild, granulocytopenia grade III or IV were observed in the 46% of the cycles; infection-related granulocytopenia was observed in 17%, but no fatality due to therapy was observed. Cardiac toxicity was mild, only seven patients showed a drop in left ejection ventricular function, but no symptomatic heart failure has been observed.

The intensive CEOP-Bleo regimen with increasing doses of cyclophosphamide and epirubicin is a useful and well-tolerated regimen in the treatment of poor prognosis diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The International Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Prognostic Factors Project. A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1993; 329:987–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Longo DL, et al. Superiority of Pro-MACE-CytaBOM over Pro-MACE-MOPP in the treatment of advanced diffuse aggressive lymphoma. Results of a prospective randomized study. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9:25–38.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shipp MA, et al. Identification of major prognostic subgroups in patients with large-cell lymphoma treated with m-BACOD and M-BACOD. Ann Intern Med 1986; 104:757–765.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Klimo P, Connors JM. BACOP-B chemotherapy for the treatment of diffuse large-cell lymphoma. Ann Intern Med 1985; 102:596–602.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gordon LI, et al. Comparison of a second-generation chemotherapeutic program (m-BACOD) with a standard regimen (CHOP) for advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1992; 327:1342–1349.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Coiffier B, et al. Intensive chemotherapy in aggressive lymphoma. Updated results of LNH-80 protocol and prognostic factors affecting response and survival. J Clin Oncol 1989; 7:1018–1026.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher RI, et al. Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1993; 328:1002–1006.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nair R, et al. A randomized comparison of the efficacy and toxicity of epirubicin and doxorubicin in the treatment of patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Cancer 1998: 82:2282–2288.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zuckerman KS, Case DC, Gams RS, Pratschofer E. Chemotherapy of intermediate and high-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in an intensive epirubicin regimen. Blood 1993; 82:3564–3573.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Avilés A, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy in the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma, in press.

  11. Cheson BD, et al. Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17:1244–1253.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tilly H, et al. Randomized comparison of ACVBP and m-BACOP in the treatment of patients with low-risk aggressive lymphoma. The LNH87 study. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18:1309–1315.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lepage E, et al. Prognostic significance of received relative dose intensity in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients. Ann Oncol 1993; 4:651–656.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bosly A, et al. Outcome is not improved with alternating chemotherapy in aggressive lymphoma. A prospective randomized study for the GELA on 810 patients. Hematol J 2001; 2:279–285.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shipp MA, Neuberg D, Janicek M, Canellos GP, Shulman LN. High-dose CHOP as initial therapy for patients with poor prognosis aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. A dose finding study. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13:2916–2923.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gianni AM, et al. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation compared to MACOP-B in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1997; 332:1290–1297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gordon LI, et al. Phase I trial of dose escalation with growth factors support in patients with previously untreated diffuse aggressive lymphoma. Determination of the maximum tolerated dose of Pro-MACE-CYTABomp. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14:1275–1281.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Meyer RM, Hryniuk WM, Goodyear ME. The role of dose intensity in determining outcome in intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9:339–347.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agustin Avilés MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Avilés, A., Jesús Nambo, M., Neri, N. et al. Intensive chemotherapy in the treatment of aggressive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Med Oncol 21, 269–272 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1385/MO:21:3:269

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/MO:21:3:269

Key Words

Navigation