Skip to main content
Log in

The correlation between gastric cancer screening method and the clinicopathologic features of gastric cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: A gastric cancer (GC) screening program using gastrofiberscopy (GFS) or double contrast upper gastrointestinal series (UGIS), as a public policy, has been used in Korea since 1996. The aim of this study was to assess whether there have been major changes in clinicopathologic features of GC by introducing GC screening.

Method: We reviewed the medical records of 1478 consecutive patients with GC who underwent gastrectomy between 1989 and 1999. Patients were divided into two groups: group I (before GC screening), 1989–1995 (n=840), and group II (after GC screening), 1996–1999 (n=638).

Results: After employment of GC screening, the incidence of early cancer was significantly increased (21% vs 13%, p<0.0001). During these years, the proportion of patients using GFS as the first diagnostic procedure and the relative frequency of intestinal-type GC increased significantly (63% vs 84%, 0.6 vs 1.2, respectively, p<0.0001).

Conclusions: These results suggest that GC screening is effective for early detection of GC. Furthermore, the preferred screening method of GC can attribute the clinicopathologic features of GC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fuchs CS, Mayer RJ. Gastric carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1995; 333:32–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Borch K, et al. Changing pattern of histological type, location, stage and outcome of surgical treatment of gastric carcinoma. Br J Surg 2000; 87:618–626.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Craanen ME, et al. Time trends in gastric carcinoma: changing patterns of type and location. Am J Gastroenterol 1992; 87:572–579.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gore RM. Gastric cancer. Clinical and pathologic features. Radiol Clin North Am 1997; 35:295–310.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Adachi Y, et al. Pathology and prognosis of gastric carcinoma: well versus poorly differentiated type. Cancer 2000; 89:1418–1424.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nikulasson S, et al. Tumours in Iceland. 16. Malignant tumours of the stomach. Histological classification and description of epidemiological changes in a high-risk population during 30 years. APMIS 1992; 100:930–941.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ekstrom AM, et al. Decreasing incidence of both major histologic subtypes of gastric adenocarcinoma—a population-based study in Sweden. Br J Cancer 2000; 83:391–396.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pinheiro PS, van der Heijden LH, Coebergh JW. Unchanged survival of gastric cancer in the southeastern Netherlands since 1982: result of differential trends in incidence according to Lauren type and subsite. Int J Cancer 1999; 84:28–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bruno L, et al. Clinicopathologic findings and results of surgical treatment in cardiac adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2000; 74:33–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hallissey MT, et al. Early detection of gastric cancer. Br Med J 1990; 301:513–515.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pisani P, et al. Case-control study of gastric cancer screening in Venezuela. Br J Cancer 1994; 69:1102–1105.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Murakami R, et al. Estimation of validity of mass screening program for gastric cancer in Osaka, Japan. Cancer 1990; 65:1255–1260.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fukao A, et al. The evaluation of screening for gastric cancer in Miyagi prefecture, Japan. A population-based case-control study. Int J Cancer 1995; 60:45–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. ’99 Annual Report for Health Screening Project. National Health Insurance Corp. of Korea. 2000, pp. 14.

  15. Gore RM, et al. Gastric cancer. Radiologic diagnosis. Radiol Clin North Am 1997; 35:311–329.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Halvorsen RA Jr, Yee J, McCormick VD. Diagnosis and staging of gastric cancer. Semin Oncol 1996; 23:325–335.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Low VH, et al. Diagnosis of gastric carcinoma: sensitivity of double-contrast barium studies. Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162:329–334.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Levine MS, et al. Scirrhous carcinoma of the stomach: radiologic and endoscopic diagnosis. Radiology 1990; 175:151–154.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sobin LH, Wittekind CH, and editors. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. International Union Against Cancer. 5th edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Koo JW, et al. The effect of screening of stomach cancer on stage shift. J Kor Soc Prev Med 2000; 33:25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kim YS, et al. Efficacy of screening for gastric cancer in a Korean adult population: a case-control study. J Korean Med Sci 2000; 15:510–515.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Analysis of cancer screening recommendations by physicians for various types of cancer. J Kor Soc Prev Med 2000; 33:99–108.

  23. Lauren PA, Nevalainen TJ. Epidemiology of intestinal and diffuse types of gastric carcinoma. A time-trend study in Finland with comparison between studies from high- and low-risk areas. Cancer 1993; 71:2926–2933.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu CW, et al. Clinicopathological significance of intestinal and diffuse types of gastric carcinoma in Taiwan Chinese. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1996; 11:1083–1088.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Correa P, Chen VW. Gastric cancer. Cancer Surv 1994; 19–20:55–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ji-Youn Han M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Han, JY., Son, H., Lee, W.C. et al. The correlation between gastric cancer screening method and the clinicopathologic features of gastric cancer. Med Oncol 20, 265–269 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1385/MO:20:3:265

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/MO:20:3:265

Key Words

Navigation