Advertisement

The estimation of blood alcohol concentration

Widmark revisited
  • Douglas PoseyEmail author
  • Ashraf Mozayani
Original Article

Abstract

Expert witnesses and others involved in toxicology are frequently asked to perform retrograde extrapolation of blood alcohol concentration (BAC) or to estimate BAC based on a proposed drinking scenario. Although many individuals are reluctant to perform these calculations and some jurisdictions expressly prohibit them, a significant number of practitioners routinely estimate BAC based on this type of calculation, using as a basis the fundamental work of Widmark. Although improvements to the Widmark formula and other data pertaining to the pharmacology of alcohol have been published, these improvements are frequently ignored when estimating BAC. This article summarizes five published models for the estimation of BAC and proposes a sixth model that incorporates recent data on the rate of absorption of alcohol from the GI tract into the existing five models. The five improved models can be computerized and used to construct comparative snapshots of the BACs calculated by the different algorithms. This will allow practitioners to provide a more balanced picture of the variability in BAC calculations.

Key Words

Forensic toxicology Widmark extrapolation alcohol ethanol blood 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Widmark EMP. Die theoretischen Grundlagen und the praktische Verwendbarkeit der gerichtlich-medizinischen Alkoholbestimmung. Berlin: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1932.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Uemura K, Fujimiya T, Ohbora Y, Yashuhara M, Yoshida K. Individual differences in the kinetics of alcohol absorption and elimination: A human study. Forensic Sci Med Pathol, 2005;1:24–27.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Watson PE, Watson ID, Batt RD. Prediction of blood alcohol concentrations in human subjects: updating the Widmark equation. J Stud Alcohol 1989;42:547–556.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Forrest ARW. The estimation of Widmark’s factor. J For Sci Soc 1986;26:249–252.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Seidl S, Jensen U, Alt A. The calculation of blood ethanol concentrations in males and females. Int J Legal Med 2000;114:71–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ulrich L, Cramer Y, Zink P. Relevance of individual parameters in the calculation of blood alcohol levels in relation to the volume of intake. Blutalkohol 1987;24:192–198.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Altman PL, Dittmer DS, eds. Blood and Other Body Fluids, Washington DC: Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 1961.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Durnin JVGA, Womersly J.. Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skin fold thickness. Br J Nutr 1974;32:77–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dubowski KM. Human pharmacokinetics of ethanol: I. Peak blood concentrations and elimination in male and female subjects. Alcohol Tech Rep 5, 1976:55–63.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shajani NK, Dinn HM. Blood alcohol concentrations reached in human subjects after consumption of alcoholic beverages in a social setting. Can Soc Forensic Sci J 1985;18:38–48.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tam TW, Yang CT, Fung WK, Mok VK. Alcohol metabolism of local Chinese in Hong Kong: a statistical determination on the effects of various physiological factors. Forensic Sci Int 2006;156:95–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zuba D, Piekoszewski W. Uncertainty in Theoretical Calculations of Alcohol Concentration. Presented at the 17th International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety (ICADTS). Glasgow, UK, 2004, Available at: http://www.icadts.org/T2004/O22.html.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Harris Country Medical Examiner’s OfficeHouston
  2. 2.Georgia Bureau of InvestigationDecatur

Personalised recommendations