Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 273–276 | Cite as

Postmortem fetal extrusion in a case of maternal heroin intoxication

Case Report

Abstract

A 34-year-old heroin addict in the eighth month of pregnancy was found dead in her apartment. The head of a fetus was partly protruding from underneath the woman’s slip. At the time of autopsy, the body was in a state of advanced putrefaction with greenish discoloration of almost the complete body surface showing pronounced marbling and, in addition, now not only the head but also the upper part of the chest of a dead fetus were extruding from the birth canal with head presentation. Autopsy showed no signs of external violence prior to death and, in particular, no indication of preceding manipulations in the region of the obstetrical canal and the uterus could be detected. The uterine cavity showed pronounced putrefactive alterations with the amniotic membranes being partially raised and bloated in a balloon-like fashion. Toxicological analyses revealed acute heroin intoxication of mother and child. The immature neonate showed no signs of live birth. Pathogenetically, the finding of not only the head but also the upper part of the chest of the fetus extruding from the birth canal at the time of autopsy (contrary to the observation made at the death scene that only part of the head of the fetus was protruding) is consistent with post-mortem fetal extrusion caused by putrefactive gas pressure against the pregnant uterus as reported in the earlier German forensic pathological literature.

Key Words

Forensic pathology heroin addiction heroin intoxication drug-related fatality pregnancy postmortem fetal extrusion 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Grundler E. Zur Kenntnis der Leichengeburt. Friedreich’s Blätter Gerichtl Med 1908;59:148–159.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jungmichel M. Über Sarggeburt. Dtsch Z Ges Gerichtl Med 1941;34:236–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hofmann Ev, Haberda A. Lehrbuch der gerichtlichen Medizin. 11th ed. Berlin Wien: Urban und Schwarzenberg, 1927.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mueller B. Gerichtliche Medizin, part I. 2nd ed. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, 1975.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Panning G Sarggeburt. Dtsch Z Gerichtl Med 1941;34:257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Strassmann F. Ein neuer Fall von Sarggeburt. Wien Klin Wochenschr 1922;35:322–323.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Strauch Über Sarggeburt. Zentralbl Gynäkol 1921;23:828–829.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stauber M, Schwerdt M, Hollenbach B. Schwangerschaft, Geburt und Wochenbett bei heroinabhängigen Frauen—derzeitiger Wissensstand und eigene Erfahrungen. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1982;42:345–352.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weingart-Jesse B, Stauber M, Hiller K, Jakobs U, Lutz R. Drogensubstitution und Entzug inder Schwangerschaft, Indikation, Nebenwirkungen, Akutsituationen, Betreuungskonzept und Ergebnisse. Gynäkologe 1991;24:322–326.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Friedrich Schulz
    • 1
  • Klaus Püschel
    • 1
  • Michael Tsokos
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Legal MedicineUniversity of HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations