Skip to main content
Log in

Characteristic acquired features of indigenous australians that may be observed in forensic practice

  • Fossickings
  • Published:
Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Australian aboriginal people who are living in traditional groups often have a variety of characteristic acquired features that distinguish them from those who have been resident in less traditional communities. These features include particular forms of scarification, tooth avulsion, and subincision of the penis. Skeletonized remains may also show acquired features such as marked dental attrition, parry fractures, and squatting notches of the long bones. Once features have been found at autopsy to indicate that the deceased may have come from a traditional aboriginal background, one can check for particular conditions with a high prevalence in tribal communities. Additionally, standard reporting practices may be modified to assist in traditional practices and rituals. The identification of a skeleton as aboriginal often means that the burial was historical and that a concealed homicide with body disposal is unlikely. Steps can then be taken to ensure that the remains are returned to aboriginal people/traditional landowners who will be able to re-inter the bones in a manner that is culturally sensitive and appropriate to their needs and belief systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bernt RM, Bernt CH. The World of the First Australians, 2nd ed., Sydney: Ure Smith, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bianchi GN, Cawte JE, Kiloh LG. Cultural identity and the mental health of Australian aborigines. Soc Sci Med 1970;3:371–387.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ling Roth H. The Aborigines of Tasmania. Halifax: F King & Sons, 1899.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Plomley NJB. The Baudin Expedition and the Tasmanian Aborigines 1802. Hobart: Blubber Head Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abbie AA. Physical characteristics. In: Cotton BC, ed., Aboriginal Man in South and Central Australia. Adelaide: WH Hawes, 1966, pp. 9–45.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Walker JB. Notes of the Aborigines of Tasmania extracted from the manuscript journals of George Washington Walker, with an introduction by James B Walker FRGS. In: Hobart HH, ed., Early Tasmania. Papers Read before the Royal Society of Tasmania During the Years 1888 to 1899. 3rd impression. Pimblet: Government Printer. 1950, pp. 238–266.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Byard RW, Gilbert JD, James RA. Traditional punishment and unexpected death in Central Australia. Am J Forensie Med Pathol 2001;22:92–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Elkin AP. The secret life and initiation. In: Elkin AP. The Australian Aborigines. 3rd ed. Sydney: Angus & Robertson, 1954, pp. 156–186.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pounder DJ. Ritual mutilation. Subincision of the penis among Australian Aborigiens. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1983;4:227–229.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stockwell RF, Mutilation of the dentition: an initiation rite observed in Aboriginal Australians. Bull Hist Dentist 1995;43:19–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fitting W. Les mutilations dentaire dans le cadre des mutilations rituelles. Actual Odontostomatol (Paris) 1989;166:191–203.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morrison J. The origins of the practices of circumcision and subincision among the Australian aborigines. Med J Aust 1967;I:125–127.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Horne G, Aiston G. Various rites. In: Horne G, Aiston G. Savage Life in Central Australia. London: Macmillan. 1924, pp. 158–174.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cole K. The Aborigines of Arnhem Land. Adelaide: Rigby Ltd. 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jones IH. Subincision among Australian Western Desert Aborigines. Brit J Med Psychol 1969;42:183–190.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Roheim G. The symbolism of subincision. Am Imag 1949;6:321–328.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Elkin AP. Aboriginal Men of High Degree. 2nd ed. St Lucis: University of Queensland Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Byard RW. Traditional medicine of Aboriginal Australia. Can Med Assoc J 1988;139:792–794.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cawte JE, Djagamara N, Barrett MG. The meaning of subincision of the urethra to aboriginal Australians. Brit J Med Psychol 1966;39:245–253.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Berndt RM. Subincision in a non-subincision area. Am Imag 1951;8:165–179.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Murphy LJ. Two primitive urethral operations in Oceania: subincision in Australia and thoka-losi in Fiji and Tonga (abstract) Brit J Urol 1974;46:123.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Thorne A, Ross A. The Skeletal Manual. A Handbook for the Identification of Aboriginal Skeletal Remains. National Parks Wildlife Service & NSW Police Liaison Unit 1986.

  23. Kellock WL, Parsons PA. Variation of minor non-metrical cranial variants in Australian aborigines. Am J Phys Anthrop 1970;32:409–422.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Larnach SL. Australian aboriginal craniology. In: Elkin AP, ed. The Oceania Monographs No 21. Sydney: The University of Sydney, 1978, pp. 200–345.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pounder DJ. Forensic aspects of Aboriginal skeletal remains in Australia. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1984;5:41–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dinning TAR. A study of healed fractures in the Australian Aboriginal. Med J Aust 1949;11:712–714.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bateson EM, Labrooy T. The Aboriginal fracture. Australas Radiol 1983;27:45–49.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Prasada Rao PD. Squatting facets on the talus and tibia in Austrahan Aborigines. Arch Phys Anthrop Oceania 1966;1:51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tulsi RS, Prasada Rao PD. Ilio-tibial facet of the tibia in the Australian Aborigine. Arch Phys Anthrop Oceania 1966;3:232–235.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Boulle E-L. Evolution of two human skeletal markers of the squatting position: a diachronic study from antiquity to the modern age. Am J Phys Anthro 2001;115:50–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Brubaker ML. Yaws and endemic syphilis. In: Hunter GW. Swartzwelder JC, Clyde DF, eds. Tropical Medicine 5th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1976, pp. 154–161.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hackett CJ. An introduction to diagnostic criteria of syphilis, treponarid and yaws (treponematoses) in dry bones, and some implications. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol 1975;368:229–241.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Maruff P, Burns CB, Currie BJ, Currie J. Neurological and cognitive abnormalities associated with chronic petrol sniffing. Brain 1998;121:1903–1917.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kaclan C, Harper C, Vieira BI. Acute encephalopathy and death due to petrol sniffing: neuropathological findings. Aust NZ J Med 1986;16:804–807.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Byard RW, Chivell WC, Gilbert JD. Unusual facial markings and lethal mechanisms in a series of gasoline inhalation deaths. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2003;24:298–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Byard RW. Chivell W. The interaction of death. sorcery and coronial/forensic practices on traditional indigenous communities. J Clin Forensic Med (In press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger W. Byard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Byard, R.W., Simpson, E. Characteristic acquired features of indigenous australians that may be observed in forensic practice. Forens Sci Med Pathol 1, 207–213 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1385/FSMP:1:3:207

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/FSMP:1:3:207

Key Words

Navigation