Abstract
The basic premise of the thrifty gene hypothesis is that certain populations may have genes that determine increased fat storage, which in times of famine represent a survival advantage, but in a modern environment result in obesity and type 2 diabetes. The concept finds support in a unique animal model (Psammomys obesus) as well as among high type 2 diabetes susceptibility populations, such as North American Indians and South Pacific islanders. However, in some developing communities (e.g., Black South Africans) the thrifty phenotype hypothesis of perinatal malnutrition causing β-cell dysfunction seems a better explanation, but this remains a contentious issue. Several genes have already been identified as candidates for the thrifty genotype, including those encoding proteins of the insulin-signaling and leptin pathways, as well as intermediary fat metabolism. Particular interest lies in the peroxisome-proliferator activated receptors. An innovative approach might be to focus on the “mirror image” of the thrifty genotype—congenital lipoatrophic diabetes mellitus, whose molecular defect remains enigmatic. We conclude that the genetic basis of the thrifty genotype probably derives from the multiplicative effects of polymorphisms at several sites mentioned above, rather than a single regulatory abnormality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Neel, J. V. (1962). Am. J. Hum. Genet. 14, 353–362.
Neel, J. V. (1982). In: The Genetics of Diabetes Mellitus. Proceedings of the Serono Symposium. Kobberling, J. and Tattersall, R., eds., London: Academic, pp. 283–293.
Dowse, G. and Zimmet, P. (1993). Br. Med. J. 306, 532,533.
Dowse, G. K., Hodge, A. M., and Zimmett, P. Z. (1996). In: Progress in Obesity Research, Vol. 7. Angel, A., Anderson, H., Bouchard, C., Lau, D., Leiter, L., and Mendelson, R., eds., London: John Libbey, pp. 227–238.
Shafrir, E. (1996). Diabetes Metab. 22, 122–131.
Auwerx, J. and Staels, B. (1998). Lancet 351, 737–742.
Joffe, B. I. and Seftel, H. C. (1994). J. Intern. Med. 235, 137–142.
Hales, C. N., Barker, D. J. P., Clarke, P. M. S., Cox, L. J., Fall, C., Osmond, C., et al. (1991). Br. Med. J. 303, 1019–1022.
Kramer, M. S., and Joseph, K. S. (1996). Lancet 348, 1254.
Dunger, D. B., Ong, K. K., Huxtable, S. J., Sherriff, A., Woods, K. A., Ahmed, M. L., et al. (1998). Nature Genet. 19, 98–100.
Hussain, M. A. (1997). Eur. J. Endocrinol. 136, 469,470.
Withers, D. J., Gutierrez, J. S., Fowery, H., Burks, D. J., Ren, J.-M., Previs, S., et al. (1998). Nature 391, 900–904.
Baynes, K. C. R., Whitehead, J., Krook, A., O’Rahilly, S. (1997). Q. J. Med. 90, 557–562.
Froguel, P., Hager, J., and Vionnet, N. (1995). Curr. Opinion Endocrinol. Diabetes 2, 285–289.
Fujisawa, T., Ikegami, H., Yamato, E., Takekawa, K., Nakagawa, Y., Hamada, Y., et al. (1996). Diabetolgia 39, 349–352.
Schoonjans, K., Martin, G., Staels, B., and Auwerx, J. (1997). Curr. Opinion Lipidology 8, 159–166.
Brun, R. P., Kim, J. B., Hu, E., and Spiegelman, B. M. (1997). Curr. Opinion Lipidology 8, 212–218.
Brun, R. P., Kim, J. B., Hu, E., Altlok, S., and Spiegelman, B. M. (1996). Curr. Opinion Cell Biology 8, 826–832.
Spiegelman, B. M. (1998). Diabetes 47, 507–514.
Magre, J., Vigouroux, C., Hilbert, P., Faure, S., Gedde Dahl, T., Khallouf, E., et al. (1997). First International Conference on Congenital Lipodystrophies, Brussels.
Panz, V. R., Joffe, B. I., Raal, F. J., Wing, J. R., Kedda, M.-A., and Seftel, H. C. (1997). S. Afr. Med. J. 87, 1277–1283.
Vigauroux, C., Fajas, L., Khallouf, E., Meier, M., Gyspay, G., Lascols, O., et al. (1998). Diabetes 47, 490–492.
Okazawa, H., Mori, H., Tamari, Y., Araki, S., Niki, T., Masugi, J., et al. (1997). Diabetes 47, 1904–1906.
Carr, A., Samaras, K., Chisholm, D. J., and Cooper, D. A. (1998). Lancet 352, 1881–1883.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Joffe, B., Zimmet, P. The thrifty genotype in type 2 diabetes. Endocr 9, 139–141 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1385/ENDO:9:2:139
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/ENDO:9:2:139