Skip to main content
Log in

Postmenopausal hormone therapy

Lessons from observational and randomized studies

  • Published:
Endocrine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for cardioprotection in postmenopausal women remains controversial. Observational studies conducted in the past two decades have suggested an average risk reduction of 50% for the primary prevention of CAD, these findings, however, have not been confirmed by recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The discrepancies in results between observational and randomized studies are related to several differences in patient selection, hormone regimen, and biological effect of hormones in different periods of women’s life. In an attempt to justify the use of hormone replacement therapy against the mounting contraindications for any use by several opinion leaders and scientific societies, several authors have criticized the design and the results of the randomized clinical trials as the cause of the unexpected results. The randomized clinical studies were conducted exceptionally well; therefore, methodologic issues are not the problem. The main difference between the observational and randomized studies, which may fully explain the discrepancies between these studies, are the women under study and their reasons for taking hormone therapy. In the observational studies women choose to take ovarian hormones initially for menopausal symptoms and then may have decided to continue for other reasons, while in the randomized studies the absence of menopausal symptoms was a pre-requisite for inclusion in the study. This apparently small difference has important implications because symptomatic women are younger and have clinical symptoms that suggest the lack of estrogen effect on several organs or systems. In conclusion, several biological reasons may have contributed to the divergent findings from observational studies and RCTs. Clearly time elapsed since menopause seems to be an important one for its effect on vascular responsiveness to ovarian hormones and to prothrombotic effects. In the meantime, a role remains for combined estrogen and progestin supplementation in the treatment of menopausal symptoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stampfer, M., and Colditz, G. (1991). Prev. Med. 20, 47–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sullivan, J. M., Vander Zwaag, R., Lemp, G. F., et al. (1988). Ann. Intern. Med. 108, 358–363.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson, P., Garrison, R. J., and Castelli, W. P. (1985). N. Engl. J. Med. 313, 1038–1043.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Grodstein, F., Stampfer, M. J., Colditz, G. A., et al. (1997). N. Engl. J. Med. 336, 1769–1775.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Falkeborn, M., Persson, I., Adami, H. O., et al. (1992). Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 99, 821–828.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grodstein, F., Stampfer, M. J., Manson, J. E., et al. (1996). N. Engl. J. Med. 335, 453–461.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Henderson, B. E., Paganini-Hill, A., and Ross, R. K. (1991). Arch. Intern. Med. 151, 75–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mendelsohn, M. E. and Karas, R. H. (1999). N. Engl. J. Med. 340, 1801–1811.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosano, G. M., Sarrel, P. M., Poole-Wilson, P. A., and Collins, P. (1993). Lancet 342, 133–136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, A., Sun, D., Koller, A., and Kaley, G. (2000). Circulation 101, 94–100.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Williams, J. K., Honore, E. K., Washburn, S. A., and Clarkson, T. B. (1994). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 24, 1757–1761.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Adams, M. R., Register, T. C., Golden, D. L., Wagner, J. D., and Williams, J. K. (1997). Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 17, 217–221.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gerhard, M., Walsh, B. W., Tawakol, A., et al. (1998). Circulation 98, 1158–1163.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Writing Group for the Women’s Health Initiative Investigators. (2002). JAMA 288, 321–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hulley, S., Grady, D., Bush, T., et al. (1998). JAMA 280, 605–613.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Grodstein, F. and Stampfer, M. J. In: Thrombosis and thromboembolism. Goldhaber, S. Z. and Ridker, P. M. (eds.). Marcel Dekker: New York, NY.

  17. Grady, D., Rubin, S. M., Petitti, D. B., et al. (1992). Ann. Intern. Med. 117, 1016–1037.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Grodstein, F., Manson, J. E., Colditz, G. A., et al. (2000). Ann. Intern. Med. 133, 933–941.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Silvestri, A., Gebara, O., Vitale, C., et al. (2003). Circulation 107, 3165–3169.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Scarabin, P. Y., Alhenc-Gelas, M., Oger, E., and Plu-Bureau, G. (1999). Thromb. Haemost. 81, 673–675.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Walsh, B. W., Paul, S., Wild, R. A., et al. (2000). J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 85, 214–218.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Post, W. S., Goldschmidt-Clermont, P. J., Wilhide, C. C., et al. (1999). Cardiovasc. Res. 43, 985–991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mikkola, T. S. and Clarkson TB. (2002). Cardiovasc. Res. 53, 605–619.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Herrington, D. M., Espeland, M. A., Crouse, J. R., et al. (2001). Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 21, 1955–1961.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Herrington, D. M., Reboussin, D. M., Brosnihan, K. B., et al. (2000). N. Engl. J. Med. 343, 522–529.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hodis, H. N., Mack, W. J., Lobo, R. A., et al. (2001). Ann. Intern. Med. 135, 939–953.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Grodstein, F., Stampfer, M. J., Manson, J. E., et al. (1996). N. Engl. J. Med. 335, 453–461.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rodriguez, C., Calle, E. E., Patel, A. V., Tatham, L. M., Jacobs, E. J., and Thun, M. J. (2001). Am. J. Epidemiol. 153, 145–152.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lobo, R. A. (2004). Arch. Intern. Med. 164, 482–484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Utian, W. H., Shoupe, D., Bachman, G., et al. (2001). Fertil. Steril. 75, 1065–1079.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Archer, D. F., Pickar, J. H., Bottiglioni. F., for the Menopause Study Group. (1994). Obstet. Gynecol. 83, 686–692.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe M. C. Rosano MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosano, G.M.C., Vitale, C. & Lello, S. Postmenopausal hormone therapy. Endocr 24, 251–254 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1385/ENDO:24:3:251

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/ENDO:24:3:251

Key Words

Navigation