Skip to main content
Log in

Substrate selectivity of Gluconobacter oxydans for production of 2,5-diketo-d-gluconic acid and synthesis of 2-keto-l-gulonic acid in a multienzyme system

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Substrate selectivity of Gluconobacter oxydans (ATCC 9937) for 2,5-diketo-d-gluconic acid (2,5-DKG) production was investigated with glucose, gluconic acid, and gluconolactone in different concentrations using a resting-cell system. The results show that gluconic acid was utilized favorably by G. oxydans as substrate to produce 2,5-DKG. The strain was coupled with glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) and 2,5-DKG reductase for synthesis of 2-keto-l-gulonic acid (2-KLG), a direct precursor of l-ascorbic acid, from glucose. NADP and NADPH were regenerated between GDH and 2,5-DKG reductase. The mole yield of 2-KLG of this multienzyme system was 16.8%. There are three advantages for using the resting cells of G. oxydans to connect GDH with 2,5-DKG reductase for production of 2-KLG: gluconate produced by GDH may immediately be transformed into 2,5-DKG so that a series of problems generally caused by the accumulation of gluconate would be avoided; 2,5-DKG is supplied directly and continuously for 2,5-DKG reductase, so it is unnecessary to take special measures to deal with this unstable substrate as it was in Sonoyama’s tandem fermentation process; and NADP(H) was regenerated within the system without any other components or systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wakisaka, Y. (1964), Agric. Biol. Chem. 28, 819–827.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boudrant, J. (1990), Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2, 322–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yin, G. (1986), Chin. J. Biotechnol. 2, 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guo, F. and Zheng, X. (1994), Med. Inform. 6, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson, S., Berman-Marks, C., Lazarus, R., Miller, J., Stafford, K., Seymour, J., Light, D., Rastetter, W., and Estell, D. (1985), Science 230, 144–149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller, J. V., Estell, D. A., and Lazarus, R. A. (1987), J. Biol. Chem. 262, 9016–9020.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Qazi, G. N., Parshad, R., Verma, V., Chopra, C. L., Buse, R., Trager, M., and Onken, U. (1991), Enzyme Microb. Technol. 13, 504–507.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sonoyama, T., Tani, H., Matsuda, K., Kageyama, B., Tanimoto, M., Kobayashi, K., Yagi, S., Kyotani, H., and Mitsushima, K. (1982), Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 43, 1064–1069.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yin, G., Ma, Z., Dong, W., Lin, H., and Ye, Q. (1990), Acta Microbiologica Sinica 31, 198–205.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng, M. and Yan, X. (1981), Pharm. Ind. 12, 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fang, X. (1992), in Pharmaceutical Analysis, An, D., Zhang, Z., and Sheng, L., eds., Jinan Publishing House, Jinan, China, pp. 1385, 1386.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Strecker, H. J. (1955), in Methods in Enzymology, vol. 1, Colowich, S. P. and Kaplan, N. O., eds., Academic, London, pp. 335–339.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li, J., Xiao, N., Yu, R., Yuan, M., Chen, L., Chen, Y., and Chen, L. (1994), in Principle and Methods of Biochemistry Experiments, Beijing University Publishing House, Beijing, pp. 168–170.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sonoyama, T. and Kobayashi, K. (1987), J. Ferment. Technol. 65, 311–317.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Alcamo, I. E. (1994), in Fundamentals of Microbiology, 4th ed., Benjamin/Cummings, Reading, MA, pp. 123–133.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dawes, E. A. (1986), in Microbial Energetics, Blackie & Son, Glasgow, UK, pp. 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dawes, E. A. (1986), in Microbial Energetics, Blackie & Son, Glasgow, UK, pp. 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kragl, U., Kruse, W., Hummel, W., and Wandrey, C. (1996), Biotechnol. Bioeng. 52, 309–319.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ikemi, M., Koizumi, N., and Ishimatsu, Y. (1990), Biotechnol. Bioeng. 36, 149–165.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Seelbach, K. and Kragl, U. (1997), Enzyme Microb. Technol. 20, 389–392.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peiji Gao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ji, A., Gao, P. Substrate selectivity of Gluconobacter oxydans for production of 2,5-diketo-d-gluconic acid and synthesis of 2-keto-l-gulonic acid in a multienzyme system. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 94, 213–223 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:94:3:213

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:94:3:213

Index Entries

Navigation